Search: disallowance

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 928clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(viia)10 Section 143(1)5 Disallowance5 Section 36(1)(vii)4 Section 1484 Section 1444 Section 143(3)4 Section 43B4 Section 43

ARYAPURAM CO=OP. URBANK LTD.,,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ACIT,, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, all the appeals filed by the assessee are partly allowed for statistical purposes; and the appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 517/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 May 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonawal – CIT DR

Section 143(3)Section 144Section 148Section 43Section 43B

section 116C of the Act is mandatory and is in the interest of the society which would enable the society to meet its requirements under other legislations. The ld. CIT(A) by following the same, directed the Assessing Officer to disallow the amount of Rs. 22,96,950/- and add the same to the total income of the assessee

ARYAPURAM CO=OP. URBANK LTD.,,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ACIT,, RAJAHMUNDRY

ARYAPURAM CO=OP. URBANK LTD.,,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ACIT,, RAJAHMUNDRY

THE ARYAPURAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ACIT,, RAJAHMUNDRY

THE ACIT,CIRCLE - 1,, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/STHE ARYAPURAM CO-OPRATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.,, RAJAHMUNDRY

THE ARYAPURAM CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD.,,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1, RAJAHMUNDRY

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SSNR PROJECTS PVT LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ACIT,, GUNTUR vs. M/S. CHATANYA GODAVARI,, GUNTUR

THE ACIT,, GUNTUR vs. M/S. CHATANYA GODAVARI,, GUNTUR