BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

89 results for “disallowance”+ Section 9(1)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,036Delhi2,906Bangalore981Chennai915Kolkata665Ahmedabad398Jaipur321Hyderabad260Pune241Chandigarh212Cochin164Indore162Surat135Raipur129Nagpur117Rajkot106Karnataka94Cuttack92Visakhapatnam89Lucknow70Amritsar63Guwahati51Panaji49Calcutta46Ranchi36Telangana31SC30Allahabad30Jodhpur30Patna29Dehradun23Varanasi16Agra11Kerala10Himachal Pradesh4Punjab & Haryana4Jabalpur4Rajasthan2Orissa2Gauhati1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)80Section 80P64Section 14839Disallowance34Deduction31Section 43B30Survey u/s 133A26Addition to Income26Section 142(1)25

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 145/VIZ/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 133Section 142(1)Section 148Section 148A

9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Showing 1–20 of 89 · Page 1 of 5

Exemption24
Section 220
Section 148A18
ITA 186/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 133Section 142(1)Section 148Section 148A

9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 185/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 133Section 142(1)Section 148Section 148A

9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 184/VIZ/2025[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jun 2025AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 133Section 142(1)Section 148Section 148A

9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 148/VIZ/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jun 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 133Section 142(1)Section 148Section 148A

9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 187/VIZ/2025[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jun 2025AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 133Section 142(1)Section 148Section 148A

9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 147/VIZ/2025[2021-22]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jun 2025AY 2021-22

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 133Section 142(1)Section 148Section 148A

9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 146/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jun 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 133Section 142(1)Section 148Section 148A

9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards

SAI PRIYA ESTATES & RESORTS LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 4(2), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 231/VIZ/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

SRI RAM TRAVELS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 3(2), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 228/VIZ/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

SRI KRISHNA SHIPPING CORPORATION,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 201/VIZ/2021[2018-19]Status: PendingITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

SRI KRISHNA SHIPPING CORPORATION,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME-TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 202/VIZ/2021[2019-20 (APRIL 2018)]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

HARSH VARDHAN SERVICES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1) , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 247/VIZ/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

VENKATA RAO PATNALA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 181/VIZ/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

THEGANAHALLY RAMAKRISHNA RAMESHA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-4(2), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 230/VIZ/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

HARSH VARDHAN SERVICES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1) , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 248/VIZ/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

SHREE BALAJI UDYOG,SRIKAKULAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD -1, SRIKAKULAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 249/VIZ/2021[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

VENKATA RAO PATNALA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(4), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessees are allowed

ITA 180/VIZ/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Mar 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru R L Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S. Balakrishnan, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suseel Kumar AgarwalFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 2Section 36Section 36(1)(va)Section 43B

section 2 applies. These amendments will take effect from 1st April, 2021 and will accordingly apply to the assessment year 2021-22 and subsequent assessment years.” 4. In the case of the assessees it is not disputed that the amount of employee’s contribution was deducted by the assessees and remitted in the Government Treasury within the due date

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS),, VIJAYAWADA vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL TRUST,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 312/VIZ/2018[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Jun 2020AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Dr. C.P. Rama Swami, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.R.S. Narayan, CIT DR
Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(3)Section 164(2)

9 ITA Nos. 312-314/VIZ/2018 (M/s. Cargo Handling Pvt. Workers Pool Trust) “1. The order of the ld. CIT(A) is erroneous both on facts and in law. 2. ld. CIT(A) erred in facts and in law in directing the AO to allow the exemption u/sec. 11 to the assessee society basing on the ITAT order without going

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS),, VIJAYAWADA vs. CARGO HANDLING PRIVATE WORKERS POOL TRUST,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA Nos

ITA 313/VIZ/2018[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Jun 2020AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Dr. C.P. Rama Swami, AdvFor Respondent: Shri S.R.S. Narayan, CIT DR
Section 13(1)(c)Section 143(3)Section 164(2)

9 ITA Nos. 312-314/VIZ/2018 (M/s. Cargo Handling Pvt. Workers Pool Trust) “1. The order of the ld. CIT(A) is erroneous both on facts and in law. 2. ld. CIT(A) erred in facts and in law in directing the AO to allow the exemption u/sec. 11 to the assessee society basing on the ITAT order without going