89 results for “disallowance”+ Section 9(1)(vii)clear
Sorted by relevance
Key Topics
Showing 1–20 of 89 · Page 1 of 5
Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble
9. Under the facts and circumstances, the Ld. CIT(A) has erred in allowing relief of Rs 71,14,092/-, holding that periodic amounts drawn by the Directors of the assessee company was for incurring business exigencies/expenditure. The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have appreciated the fact that out of the total expenditure of Rs 1,56,86,095/- towards