BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 80G(5)(vi)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai207Pune138Delhi122Bangalore82Kolkata63Ahmedabad62Chennai50Jaipur26Hyderabad21Chandigarh19Lucknow16Indore9Rajkot8Ranchi7Cuttack5Surat4Visakhapatnam3Raipur3Nagpur2Amritsar2Telangana2Allahabad1Panaji1Cochin1SC1Jodhpur1Guwahati1Punjab & Haryana1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4Section 114Exemption3Section 80G2Section 143(2)2Section 92C2Section 2(15)2Disallowance2

DEVI SEA FOODS LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 156/VIZ/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.156/Viz/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) M/S Devi Sea Foods Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of 50-1-51/1, A.S.R.Nagar Income Tax Seethammadhara Circle-3(I) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aabcd0248B] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri D.Anand, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, Cit(Dr) सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 01.12.2022 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.12.2022 O R D E R Per Shri S.Balakrishnan:

For Appellant: Shri D.Anand, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 80GSection 92Section 92BSection 92C

80G 1,69,500 2. Disallowance u/s 92 CA(3) 7,69,33,812 3. Disallowance u/s 14A r.w.Rule 8D 12,27,953 Total 7,83,31,265 4. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld.AO, the assessee filed objections before the Ld.DRP-9, Bengaluru and challenged the upward adjustments. The Ld.DRP, relying on various judicial precedents confirmed the disallowance

THE KRISHNA DISTRICT LORRY OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 160/VIZ/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Sept 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआईटीए. नं. / Ita No. 160/Viz/2024 (A.Y. 2018-19) The Krishna District Lorry Owners Associations V. Income Tax Officer –Exemption Ward 40-13-1/1, Near Benz Circle Rajahmundry Chandramoulipuram, Vijayawada – 520010 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aaatt4359H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 2(15)Section 250

80G(5)(vi) of the Act. After perusing the financial statements and submissions made by the assessee, Ld. Assessing Officer [hereinafter in short “Ld. AO"] observed that activities of the Trust are confined to the benefits of its own business people in a single district and not for the benefit for the public at large. Further, the Ld. AO observed

SRI VARAHA LAKSHMI NARASIMHA SWAMY DEVASTANAM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 430/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.430/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2020-21) Sri Varaha Lakshmi Narasimha Swamy Devstanam V. Asst. Cit #1, Simhagiri Hills, Simhachalam Road Exemption Circle Simhachalam – 530028, Visakhapatnam Income Tax Office C.R. Building “Annex” Andhra Pradesh M.G. Road Vijayawada – 520002 [Pan: Aaals1522P] Andhra Pradesh (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

Section 10Section 10(23)(v)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80G

80G of the Act. Assessee filed its return of income admitting a total income 15,08,700/- for the A.Y. 2020-21. Later, the case was selected for complete scrutiny under CASS. Statutory notices under section 143(2) and 142(1) of the Act were issued and served on the assessee. In response, assessee made various submissions. Later, a show