BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

5 results for “disallowance”+ Section 747clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi223Mumbai203Jaipur45Chennai38Kolkata36Ahmedabad34Bangalore32Chandigarh20Pune19Lucknow10Indore9Hyderabad9Surat8Visakhapatnam5Amritsar5Ranchi4Panaji4Cuttack3SC3Cochin2Patna2Raipur2Calcutta1Jodhpur1Nagpur1Rajkot1Karnataka1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)12Section 14810Section 139(1)7Disallowance5Section 143(3)4Deduction4Section 147r3Section 143(2)3Section 563

GOWRIPATNAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,GOWRIPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1, TADEPALLIGUDEM

ITA 434/VIZ/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam13 Oct 2025AY 2018-19
Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147rSection 148Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of deduction of\nRs.2,40,747/- under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961\nsolely

GOWRIPATNAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,GOWRIPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1, TADEPALLIGUDEM

ITA 432/VIZ/2025[2015-16]Status: Disposed
Section 80P3
Cash Deposit3
ITAT Visakhapatnam
13 Oct 2025
AY 2015-16
Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147rSection 148Section 56Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of deduction of\nRs.2,40,747/- under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961\nsolely

GOWRIPATNAM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,GOWRIPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD-1, TADEPALLIGUDEM

ITA 433/VIZ/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam13 Oct 2025AY 2016-17
Section 139(1)Section 143(2)Section 147rSection 148Section 56Section 80ASection 80A(5)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)

disallowance of deduction of\nRs.2,40,747/- under Section 80P(2)(a)(i) of the Income Tax Act, 1961\nsolely

3F INDUSTRIES LIMITED,TADEPALLIGUDEM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/VIZ/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Dec 2022AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Suvibha NolkhaFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 92C

747/-. b) Rejecting comparable uncontrolled Price (CUP) method as the most appropriate method of determining the ALP of purchase of raw materials or semi-finished goods or finished goods and by products with related parties by applying transaction Net Margin Method (TNMM). c) Not considering the prices published by Department of Horticulture, Government of Andhra Pradesh for determination

SINDHURA HOSPITAL,SRIKAKULAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 272/VIZ/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam29 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Us:

Section 143(3)

Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for 2 Sindhura Hospital short, “the Act”) dated 11.08.2017 for A.Y. 2015-16. The assessee firm has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal before us: “1. The order of the learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) is contrary to the facts and also the law applicable