Search: disallowance

84 results for “disallowance”+ Section 40A(2)(b)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)67 Section 14850 Section 4038 Section 80I36 Section 40A(3)32 Deduction30 Addition to Income29 Disallowance27 Section 13224

THE ACIT., VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. KRNTI ROAD TRANSPORT PVT. LTD., VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 375/VIZ/2016[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri P.S. Murthy DRFor Respondent: Shri G.V.V. Satyanarayana

Section 143(3)Section 147Section 40A(2)(b)

disallowing the excess claim of depreciation of ` 3,75,038/-. Subsequently, the case was reopened u/s 147 of the Act for the reason that the assessee had shown the same vehicles in the chart of leased vehicles and own vehicles and claimed lease rent. The A.O. also observed that the payment is covered by section 40A(2)(b

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

Showing 1–20 of 84 · Page 1 of 5

THE ACIT., VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. KRNTI ROAD TRANSPORT PVT. LTD., VIJAYAWADA

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

THE ACIT., VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. KRNTI ROAD TRANSPORT PVT. LTD., VIJAYAWADA

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

THE ACIT,, ELURU vs. M/S. THE DISTRICT CO - OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

THE ACIT., CIRCLE - 1, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,, ELURU

THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, ELURU

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

VIKAS EDUCATRIONAL SOCIETY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO, WARD - 3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

VIKAS EDUCATRIONAL SOCIETY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO, WARD - 3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), VIJAYAWADA vs. BOMMISETTY VENKATA SIVA KUMAR, VIJAYAWADA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VIJAYAWADA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

CHAMARTHY KRISHNA RAO,ELURU vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, ELURU RANGE (I/C), ELURU