BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 273Bclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi17Cochin14Mumbai13Jaipur8Amritsar7Hyderabad7Lucknow5Chennai4Indore3Ranchi3Visakhapatnam3Jodhpur3Pune2Rajkot2Kolkata1Bangalore1Ahmedabad1Nagpur1SC1Surat1

Key Topics

Section 270A8Section 271D7Section 143(3)3Penalty3Disallowance3Section 271B2Section 270A(10)2Section 269S2Business Income2

KOSANAM RAMA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), GUNTUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 226/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271DSection 273B

disallowance of the assessee’s claim for deduction of delayed deposit of the employees’ share of contribution towards Provident Fund: Rs. 16,382/-. 4. Thereafter, the Addl/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, NFAC, observed that the assessee had during the subject year sold certain properties for a consideration of Rs. 72.75 lacs. It was observed by him that

RAMAKRISHNA AGENCIES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

Addition to Income2

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 30/VIZ/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Visakhapatnam13 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 30 & 31/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2017-18) Ramakrishna Agencies, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-1(1), Pan: Aajfr 3436 Q Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. Ar

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. AR
Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(10)Section 271B

Section 270A(7) specifies the quantum of penalty @ 50% of the amount of tax payable on the underreported income. From the facts produced before us, we find that the assessee has erroneously failed to include the purchases and sales returns while filing the 6 monthly VAT returns. Further, we find that the assessee has produced copies of bills for purchases

RAMAKRISHNA AGENCIES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 31/VIZ/2023[2017-18]Status: HeardITAT Visakhapatnam13 Sept 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 30 & 31/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2017-18) Ramakrishna Agencies, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-1(1), Pan: Aajfr 3436 Q Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. Ar

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. AR
Section 143(3)Section 270ASection 270A(10)Section 271B

Section 270A(7) specifies the quantum of penalty @ 50% of the amount of tax payable on the underreported income. From the facts produced before us, we find that the assessee has erroneously failed to include the purchases and sales returns while filing the 6 monthly VAT returns. Further, we find that the assessee has produced copies of bills for purchases