BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Eclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore19Hyderabad13Delhi10Agra8Chennai8Kolkata7Jaipur6Mumbai6Cochin5Pune4Ahmedabad4Visakhapatnam3Bangalore3Nagpur2Raipur2SC2Chandigarh2Jabalpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D19Section 269S4Section 143(3)3Penalty3Disallowance3Natural Justice2

KOSANAM RAMA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), GUNTUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 226/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271DSection 273B

disallowance of the assessee’s claim for deduction of delayed deposit of the employees’ share of contribution towards Provident Fund: Rs. 16,382/-. 4. Thereafter, the Addl/Joint Commissioner of Income Tax, NFAC, observed that the assessee had during the subject year sold certain properties for a consideration of Rs. 72.75 lacs. It was observed by him that

SANNIDHI VENKATESWARA RAO,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 231/VIZ/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.231/Viz/2023 & 232/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Sannidhi Venkateswara Rao Vs. Joint.Commissioner Of 31-31-15/1, 1St Floor Income Tax Ramya Pharmaceuticals Range-1 Sai Baba Street Visakhapatnam Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aachr1320Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri B.Vinay Gandhi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madhkar Aves, DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271D

271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) 2 I.T.A. No.231/Viz/2023 & 232/Viz/2023, A.Y. 2011-12 Sannidhi Venkateswara Rao, Visakhapatnam dated 30.09.2016 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2011-12. Since the grounds raised in these appeals are identical, these appeals are clubbed, heard together and a common order is being passed for the sake of convenience as under. Facts

SANNIDHI VENKATESWARA RAO,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 232/VIZ/2023[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Dec 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.231/Viz/2023 & 232/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Sannidhi Venkateswara Rao Vs. Joint.Commissioner Of 31-31-15/1, 1St Floor Income Tax Ramya Pharmaceuticals Range-1 Sai Baba Street Visakhapatnam Dabagardens, Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aachr1320Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri B.Vinay Gandhi, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madhkar Aves, DR
Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271D

271E of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short “Act”) 2 I.T.A. No.231/Viz/2023 & 232/Viz/2023, A.Y. 2011-12 Sannidhi Venkateswara Rao, Visakhapatnam dated 30.09.2016 for the Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2011-12. Since the grounds raised in these appeals are identical, these appeals are clubbed, heard together and a common order is being passed for the sake of convenience as under. Facts