Search: disallowance

3 results for “disallowance”+ Section 271Dclear

Sorted by relevance

Indore18 Delhi17 Kolkata17 Chennai14 Hyderabad14 Jaipur11 Agra9 Pune7 Cochin5 Ahmedabad4 Visakhapatnam3 Bangalore3 Mumbai3 Chandigarh2 Raipur2 Panaji1 Jabalpur1 Lucknow1 Rajkot1 SC1 Nagpur1

Key Topics

Section 271D19 Section 269S4 Section 143(3)3 Penalty3 Disallowance3 Natural Justice2

KOSANAM RAMA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), GUNTUR

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 226/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Jul 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Us:

Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271DSection 273B

271D of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (for short “the Act”) dated 25.02.2022 for A.Y. 2017-18. The assessee has assailed the impugned order on the following grounds of appeal before us: “1. The order passed by the Learned CIT (Appeals) is against the law as well as on the facts of the case. 2. On the facts and circumstances

KOSANAM RAMA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), GUNTUR

SANNIDHI VENKATESWARA RAO,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

KOSANAM RAMA RAO,GUNTUR vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), GUNTUR

SANNIDHI VENKATESWARA RAO,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

SANNIDHI VENKATESWARA RAO,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. JOINT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, RANGE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM