BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “disallowance”+ Section 260Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi981Mumbai355Karnataka310Calcutta190Chennai121Bangalore110Kolkata102Telangana100Amritsar50Indore36Ahmedabad35Kerala34Jaipur33Hyderabad28Nagpur25Chandigarh22SC20Lucknow20Punjab & Haryana18Pune16Cochin12Cuttack12Surat10Raipur10Orissa5Visakhapatnam4Allahabad3Panaji3Dehradun2Gauhati1H.L. DATTU S.A. BOBDE1Rajasthan1Andhra Pradesh1Tripura1Agra1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Ranchi1Varanasi1Jodhpur1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)13Section 194H5Section 2633Section 403Deduction3Section 143(3)2Section 40A(2)2Disallowance2

THE SRI GOWRI COOPERATIVE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 26/VIZ/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Aug 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blem/S. The Sri Gowri Vs. Pr.Cit-1, Co-Operative Society, Visakhapatnam. D.No.49-34-32/1, Konathala Complex, Akkayyapalem Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 8140 M (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri K.S.S. Sarma – AdvFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Sonawal– CIT DR
Section 263Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed by the Assessing Officer for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Commissioner partly allowed the appeal holding that the interest income relatable to non-SLR investments would not qualify for exemption. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee holding that in respect of interest income arising both (M/s. The Sri Gowri Co-op. Society) from

SRI UMA KAMANDALESWARA CO - OPERATIVE RURAL BANK LTD.,ATHREYAPURAM vs. THE ADDL. CIT,, KAKINADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 199/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam13 Feb 2019AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Blesri Uma Kamandaleswara Vs. Addl.Cit, Kakinada Co-Op Rural Bank Ltd., Ryali, Range, Kakinada. Athreyapuram Mandalm, East Godavari District. Pan No. Aadas 4663 B (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri P.S. Murthy – Sr.DR
Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowed by the Assessing Officer for deduction under section 80P(2)(a)(i). The Commissioner partly allowed the appeal holding that the interest income relatable to non-SLR investments would not qualify for exemption. The Tribunal allowed the appeal of the assessee holding that in respect of interest income arising both from SLR securities and from non-SLR securities, deduction

M/S. FUSION VOICE SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT.LTD,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ITO,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 335/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal
Section 143(3)Section 194HSection 263Section 40

Section 260A of the Act. 11. The appeals fail and are, accordingly, dismissed. The miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall also stand dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs.” 11. From the above judicial pronouncements, it is evident that passing on incentives by the wholesale distributor to the retail dealer, there is no principal and agent relationship

CMR TRANSPORT CONTRACTORS COMPANY PRIVATE LTD,VIJYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed,

ITA 69/VIZ/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Oct 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.69/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15) Cmr Transport Contractors Company Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of Private Limited Income Tax D.No.54-18/3-4, Sivapuram Colony Circle-2(1) Near Iti Gate Vijayawada Vijayawada [Pan : Aaccc6075E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri Vamsi Rajesh, ARFor Respondent: Shri Madhukar Aves, DR
Section 143(3)Section 40A(2)Section 44A

section 40A(2) of I.T.Act. In the instant case, the payment made to directors is in excess of 15.14% compared to outsiders and the disallowance 12% of hire charges made by the AO is reasonable and we do not find any reason to interfere with the order of the Ld.CIT(A)and the same is upheld.” 12 I.T.A. No.69/Viz/2023, A.Y.2014-15