BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

12 results for “disallowance”+ Section 239clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi801Mumbai627Chennai283Bangalore188Kolkata164Ahmedabad118Jaipur85Hyderabad74Pune66Raipur59Chandigarh45Cochin36Surat35Indore31Amritsar30Cuttack28Lucknow24Nagpur17Guwahati16Rajkot15Karnataka12Visakhapatnam12Ranchi8Jodhpur7Panaji7Agra7SC7Telangana4Patna3Allahabad2Jabalpur2Varanasi2Punjab & Haryana2Kerala1Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)12Section 3512Section 1477Section 1486Deduction6Section 405Section 35(1)4Section 35(3)4Section 143(1)4Addition to Income

NIMMAGADDA RAMESH,HYDERABAD vs. THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 54/VIZ/2015[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Apr 2019AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blenimmagadda Ramesh, Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Prop. : Srinivasa Stone Crusher, Vijayawada. 6-126, Ibrahimpatnam, Krishna District. Pan No. Adspn 8553 G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR
Section 143(3)Section 40

section 40(a)(ia) of the Act are invoked and the amount of Rs. 28,34,239/- is disallowed and added

SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED,,RAJAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

4
Reassessment4
TDS3
ITA 404/VIZ/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Feb 2018AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh A. Thar &For Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam – Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

Section 15 r.w.s. 17 of the I T Act, any of the payment made by the employer or former employer to the employee would be taxed in the hands of the employee as salary income only, and therefore such expenditure should be allowed in the hands of the employer as salary expenditure. It was also contended that these payments have

THE DCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE MILLS PVT LTD,, SRIKAKULAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 340/VIZ/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Feb 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh A. Thar &For Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam – Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

Section 15 r.w.s. 17 of the I T Act, any of the payment made by the employer or former employer to the employee would be taxed in the hands of the employee as salary income only, and therefore such expenditure should be allowed in the hands of the employer as salary expenditure. It was also contended that these payments have

ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PVT. LTD,, RAJAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 458/VIZ/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Feb 2018AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh A. Thar &For Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam – Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

Section 15 r.w.s. 17 of the I T Act, any of the payment made by the employer or former employer to the employee would be taxed in the hands of the employee as salary income only, and therefore such expenditure should be allowed in the hands of the employer as salary expenditure. It was also contended that these payments have

SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PVT. LTD.,,RAJAM vs. THE ITO,, SRIKAKULAM

In the result, appeals filed by the Revenue in ITA

ITA 349/VIZ/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Feb 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bledcit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Ito, Ward-3, Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Srikakulam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Acit, Circle-4(1), Vs. M/S. Sri Varalakshmi Jute Visakhapatnam. Twine Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Rajam (Po), Srikakulam District. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L Sri Varalakshmi Jute Twine Vs. Dcit, Circle-4(1), Mills Pvt. Ltd., Bobbili Road, Visakhapatnam. Rajam (Po), Srikakulam Dist. Pan No. Aadcs 1167 L (Appellants) (Respondents)

For Appellant: Shri Yogesh A. Thar &For Respondent: Shri T. Satyanandam – Sr.DR
Section 143(1)Section 143(3)

Section 15 r.w.s. 17 of the I T Act, any of the payment made by the employer or former employer to the employee would be taxed in the hands of the employee as salary income only, and therefore such expenditure should be allowed in the hands of the employer as salary expenditure. It was also contended that these payments have

THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. EFFTRONICS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 61/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DRFor Respondent: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(3)

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s.35(2AB) of Rs.3,36,70,436/-, since the deduction is allowable for manufacture of certain electronic items only and not to the articles manufactured by the assessee which are machines used in Railway Stations that cannot be categorized as electronic items; 2. The Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in allowing the weighted deduction

THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. EFFTRONICS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 63/VIZ/2017[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DRFor Respondent: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(3)

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s.35(2AB) of Rs.3,36,70,436/-, since the deduction is allowable for manufacture of certain electronic items only and not to the articles manufactured by the assessee which are machines used in Railway Stations that cannot be categorized as electronic items; 2. The Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in allowing the weighted deduction

DCIT, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA vs. EFFTRONICS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED., VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 551/VIZ/2017[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DRFor Respondent: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(3)

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s.35(2AB) of Rs.3,36,70,436/-, since the deduction is allowable for manufacture of certain electronic items only and not to the articles manufactured by the assessee which are machines used in Railway Stations that cannot be categorized as electronic items; 2. The Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in allowing the weighted deduction

THE DEPUTY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. EFFTRONICS SYSTEMS PRIVATE LIMITED,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 62/VIZ/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Mar 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, DRFor Respondent: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 35Section 35(1)Section 35(3)

disallowance of claim of deduction u/s.35(2AB) of Rs.3,36,70,436/-, since the deduction is allowable for manufacture of certain electronic items only and not to the articles manufactured by the assessee which are machines used in Railway Stations that cannot be categorized as electronic items; 2. The Ld. CIT(A) is not justified in allowing the weighted deduction

THE ACIT,, GUNTUR vs. M/S. VEERA ASSOCIATES,, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

ITA 332/VIZ/2016[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Feb 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri Deba Kumar SonowalFor Respondent: Shri S. Rama Rao, AR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194CSection 40Section 40a

section 40(a)(ia) of the Act the Ld. D.R. argued that it was effective from 1.4.2013 but not retrospective effect. 7. We have heard both the parties, perused the materials available on record and gone through the orders of the authorities below. During the previous year relevant to the assessment year 2007-08, the assessee has paid

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 194/VIZ/2023[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Sept 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं. / I.T.A. No. 194/Viz/2023 (धििाधरणिरध/ Assessment Year: 2014-15) Visakhapatnam Port Authority V. Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax Circle-1(1) Administrative Office Building 4Th Floor, Pratyakshakar Bhavan Port Area, Visakhapatnam 530001 Mvp Road, Beside Post Office Andhra Pradesh Sector-8, Mvp Colony Visakhapatnam – 530017 [Pan: Aaalv0035C] Andhra Pradesh (अपीलार्/ Appellant) (प्र्/ Respondent) करदाताकाप्त्््िध/ Assessee Represented By Shri Gvn Hari, Ar : राजसकाप्त्््िध/ Department Represented By Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit(Dr) : 29.07.2024 सु्वाईसमापहो्ेक््त्ि/ Date Of Conclusion Of Hearing : घोषणाक्तार्ख/Date Of Pronouncement 05.09.2024 : आदेश/O R D E R Per Shri S Balakrishnan: 1. This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), [Ld.Cit(A)], National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi In Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2023- 24/1052850996(1) Dated 15.05.2023 Arising Out Of Order Passed Under

Section 143(3)Section 37

section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) dated 31.12.2016 for the A.Y. 2014-15. 2. The Tribunal while adjudicating the case inadvertently erred in not adjudicating Ground No. 5 raised by the assessee in the original grounds of appeal. Thereafter the assessee filed a Miscellaneous Application seeking recall of the order since Ground

ANDHRA PRADESH CAPITAL REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,,VIJAYAWADA vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1),, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is partly allowed

ITA 394/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Oct 2019AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleandhra Pradesh Capital Vs. Acit, Circle-3(1), Region Development Authority Vijayawada. (Formerly Vgtm Urban Development Authority), Uda Complex, Lenin Centre, Governorpet, Vijayawada. Pan No. Aaalv 0067 E (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao, AdvFor Respondent: Shri T.S.N. Murthy, Sr.DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 3

disallowing Rs. 19,27,95,540/-. 4. On being aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before the ld. CIT(A). The ld. CIT(A) upheld the reopening and also confirmed the additions. 5. On being aggrieved, assessee carried the matter in appeal before this Tribunal. (A.P. Capital Region Development Authority) 6. Ld. counsel for the assessee has submitted that