BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “disallowance”+ Section 23(1)(va)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi583Mumbai168Jaipur148Raipur97Ahmedabad72Chennai58Kolkata49Bangalore33Chandigarh32Hyderabad31Indore26Pune25Cochin14Jodhpur13Surat13Guwahati12Amritsar11Visakhapatnam7Lucknow5Varanasi5Patna4SC4Nagpur3Cuttack2Rajkot2Agra1

Key Topics

Section 36(1)(va)10Section 143(3)6Addition to Income6Section 143(1)5Condonation of Delay5Deduction5Section 2503Section 143(2)3Section 68

RANAR AGROCHEM LIMITED,PARAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 288/VIZ/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.288/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2014-15) Ranar Agrochem Limited, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Visakhapatnam. Of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaccp0372M (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri M. Madhusudan, Ca (Hybrid) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Sri Jenardhanan V, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 14/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 31/10/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Company Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 15/05/2024, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short, “A.O.”) Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (For Short “The Act”) Dated 30/12/2016 For A.Y.

For Appellant: Shri M. Madhusudan, CAFor Respondent: Sri Jenardhanan V, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)Section 36(1)(va)Section 40
3
Section 139(1)3
Section 903
Disallowance2
Section 68

va) r.w.s 2(24)(x) of the Act, we find that as the issue as on date is no more res integra pursuant to the judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of Checkmate Services Pvt Ltd Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax-I, Civil Appeal No. 2833 of 2016, dated 12/10/2022, therefore, no infirmity emerges 20 Ranar

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GUNTUBOLU UMA SAI PRASAD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 226/VIZ/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri I. Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance of expenditure indicated in the audit report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return. These issues are dealt with by us while adjudicating the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No. 226/Viz/2022 (AY 2018-19) and ITA No. 227/Viz/2022 (AY 2019-20) and held that with regard to late remittance of contribution under

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GUNTUBOLU UMA SAI PRASAD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 227/VIZ/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri I. Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance of expenditure indicated in the audit report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return. These issues are dealt with by us while adjudicating the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No. 226/Viz/2022 (AY 2018-19) and ITA No. 227/Viz/2022 (AY 2019-20) and held that with regard to late remittance of contribution under

GUNTUBOLU UMA SAI PRASAD,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 97/VIZ/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Jul 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri I. Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

disallowance of expenditure indicated in the audit report but not taken into account in computing the total income in the return. These issues are dealt with by us while adjudicating the Revenue’s appeal in ITA No. 226/Viz/2022 (AY 2018-19) and ITA No. 227/Viz/2022 (AY 2019-20) and held that with regard to late remittance of contribution under

OURS YOUTH CLUB,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 22/VIZ/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam24 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.22/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Ours Youth Club Vs. Income Tax Officer 1-19-17, Bc Colony Agraharam Ward-1 Vizianagaram Vijayanagaram [Pan : Aaaao2600H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 139(1)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 250Section 36(1)(va)

disallowed the contributions made towards PF and ESI at Rs.21,72,171/- as it relates to previous year and for the balance amount of Rs.11,78,666/- (Rs.33,50,827 – Rs.21,72,171/-) directed the AO to verify whether the payments were made within the due dates and allow the same from the perspective of section 36(1)(va

BHARATH YUVA SANKSHEMA SANGHAM,ELURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, ELURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 160/VIZ/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam29 Aug 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआईटीए. नं. / Ita No. 160/Viz/2025 निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year:2018-19) Bharath Yuva Sankshema Sangham V. Income Tax Officer 20B-7-21/1 Income Tax Office C/O. Ayyappa Medicals Eluru, West Godavari Andhra Pradesh Gandhi Nagar, Eluru West Godavari District – 534002 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aidpg1046K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri C. Subrahmanyam राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr.Ar

Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 154Section 250

section 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act was addressed by way of rectification order passed by the Ld.AO u/s. 154 of the Act. The Ld.AR further submitted that the only issue now contested by the assessee is with respect to addition in accordance with the Rule 87 of the Income Tax Rules, 1962. He further pleaded

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SSNR PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 461/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam31 Jan 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy & Shri S Balakrishnanआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.461/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year : 2020-21) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. M/S. Ssnr Projects Private Tax, Circle-3(1), Limited, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aarcs 2464 C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"कीओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri Samuel Nagadesi ""ाथ"कीओरसे/ Revenue By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाईकीतारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 17/12/2024 घोषणाकीतारीख/Date Of : 31/01/2025 Pronouncement O R D E R

For Appellant: Sri Samuel NagadesiFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 139Section 139(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(3)Section 36(1)(va)Section 90

va) of the Act on account of late deposit of employees’ contribution towards PF/ESI. Thus, the Ld. AO determined the assessed income of the assessee at Rs. 23,80,94,684/- against the returned income of Rs. 20,13,04,190/-. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld.AO, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT (A)-NFAC