BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

22 results for “disallowance”+ Section 221(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Delhi697Mumbai683Chennai288Ahmedabad192Bangalore152Kolkata129Jaipur128Hyderabad113Pune60Raipur58Chandigarh57Surat47Rajkot36Lucknow36Indore29Visakhapatnam22Cochin21Nagpur18Karnataka17Guwahati14Cuttack14Agra11Amritsar11Allahabad7SC7Dehradun7Varanasi6Jabalpur6Jodhpur5Telangana4Ranchi3Kerala3Panaji3Orissa2Rajasthan1

Key Topics

Section 14A27Section 14821Section 80I19Section 133A14Section 36(1)(v)14Section 40A(7)(b)14Addition to Income13Deduction11Section 143(3)

THE ACIT., CIRCLE - 1, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 476/VIZ/2012[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

disallowance made by the A.O. relating to overdue interest is upheld and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 26. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. argued that the assessee is a cooperative bank and it is following the prudential norms issued

Showing 1–20 of 22 · Page 1 of 2

10
Disallowance9
Section 1477
Reopening of Assessment7

THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU vs. M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 78/VIZ/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

disallowance made by the A.O. relating to overdue interest is upheld and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 26. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. argued that the assessee is a cooperative bank and it is following the prudential norms issued

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 50/VIZ/2012[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

disallowance made by the A.O. relating to overdue interest is upheld and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 26. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. argued that the assessee is a cooperative bank and it is following the prudential norms issued

THE ACIT,, ELURU vs. M/S. THE DISTRICT CO - OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD., ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 269/VIZ/2015[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

disallowance made by the A.O. relating to overdue interest is upheld and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 26. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. argued that the assessee is a cooperative bank and it is following the prudential norms issued

M/S THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,ELURU vs. THE ITO, WARD-2, ELURU, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 49/VIZ/2012[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

disallowance made by the A.O. relating to overdue interest is upheld and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 26. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. argued that the assessee is a cooperative bank and it is following the prudential norms issued

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, ELURU

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 524/VIZ/2014[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

disallowance made by the A.O. relating to overdue interest is upheld and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 26. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. argued that the assessee is a cooperative bank and it is following the prudential norms issued

THE DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,,ELURU vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals filed by the assessee in ITA No

ITA 515/VIZ/2014[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Jan 2018AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 133ASection 143(1)Section 147Section 148Section 36(1)(v)Section 40A(7)(b)

disallowance made by the A.O. relating to overdue interest is upheld and dismissed the appeal of the assessee. 26. Aggrieved by the order of the CIT(A), the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing, the Ld. A.R. argued that the assessee is a cooperative bank and it is following the prudential norms issued

DEVI SEA FOODS LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 156/VIZ/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Dec 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.156/Viz/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) M/S Devi Sea Foods Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of 50-1-51/1, A.S.R.Nagar Income Tax Seethammadhara Circle-3(I) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aabcd0248B] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri D.Anand, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, Cit(Dr) सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 01.12.2022 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.12.2022 O R D E R Per Shri S.Balakrishnan:

For Appellant: Shri D.Anand, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, CIT(DR)
Section 143(3)Section 144C(5)Section 14ASection 80GSection 92Section 92BSection 92C

1% rate of corporate guarantee determined by DRP is high and arbitrary. 9. The issue raised in the Grounds of Appeal is with respect to adjustments made by the TPO/DRP in the corporate guarantee commission on the gross guarantee given to AE. The Ld. AR pleaded that it is not an international transaction as the assessee has not charged

THE JCIT(OSD),, VIJAYAWADA vs. THE GANDHI COPERATIVE URBAN BANK LTD., VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2012-

ITA 199/VIZ/2016[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Sept 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.199/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13) Joint Commissioner Of Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Income Tax (Osd), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.01/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.Nos.199/Viz/2016) The Gandhi Cooperative Urban Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Bank Ltd., Vijayawada Tax (Osd), Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] Cross Objection No.02/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016) The Gandhi Cooperative Urban Deputy Commissioner Of Bank Ltd., Vijayawada Income Tax [Pan :Aaaat8072G] Circle-2(1), Vijayawada निर्धाऩिती की ओि से/ Assessee By : Shri C.Subrahmanyam, Ar िधजस्व की ओि से/ Revenue By : Smt U Mini Chandran, Dr सुिवधई की तधिीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.08.2018 05.09.2018 घोषणध की तधिीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt U Mini Chandran, DR

221 followed. 27. This Tribunal in the case of Gandhi Co-operative Urban Bank Limited in ITA No.469/Vizag/2012 dated 30.11.2015 has considered the similar issue and allowed the interest on non-performing assets. The relevant extract of this Tribunal in para No.7 to 10 is extracted as under: 7. We have gone through the reason given

THE DY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. THE GANDHI CO-OP., VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the assessment years 2012-

ITA 461/VIZ/2016[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Sept 2018AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.199/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2012-13) Joint Commissioner Of Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Income Tax (Osd), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016 (धििाारण िर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. The Gandhi Cooperative Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Urban Bank Ltd. Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.01/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.Nos.199/Viz/2016) The Gandhi Cooperative Urban Vs. Joint Commissioner Of Income Bank Ltd., Vijayawada Tax (Osd), Vijayawada [Pan :Aaaat8072G] Cross Objection No.02/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.461/Viz/2016) The Gandhi Cooperative Urban Deputy Commissioner Of Bank Ltd., Vijayawada Income Tax [Pan :Aaaat8072G] Circle-2(1), Vijayawada निर्धाऩिती की ओि से/ Assessee By : Shri C.Subrahmanyam, Ar िधजस्व की ओि से/ Revenue By : Smt U Mini Chandran, Dr सुिवधई की तधिीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.08.2018 05.09.2018 घोषणध की तधिीख/Date Of Pronouncement :

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt U Mini Chandran, DR

221 followed. 27. This Tribunal in the case of Gandhi Co-operative Urban Bank Limited in ITA No.469/Vizag/2012 dated 30.11.2015 has considered the similar issue and allowed the interest on non-performing assets. The relevant extract of this Tribunal in para No.7 to 10 is extracted as under: 7. We have gone through the reason given

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEVI FISHERIES LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue stands dismissed

ITA 39/VIZ/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Sept 2021AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri N.K. Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: NoneFor Respondent: Shri B.Satyanarayana Raju, Sr.DR
Section 10(34)Section 14A

221), the Hon'ble Court has held that "Rule 8D (M/s. Devi Fisheries Ltd.) can't be read in a manner in which it takes the scope beyond the provisions of section 14A". 4.1.7 The Hon'ble ITAT, Visakhapatnam in the case of Radhakrishna Automobiles Pvt.Ltd. (ITA No.511/Vizag/2017) and D.Veerabhadra Reddy (ITA No.263/Vizag/2017) have held that "in order to invoke

THE, ACIT,, GUNTUR vs. THE GUNTUR DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD.,, TENALI

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is partly allowed and

ITA 75/VIZ/2016[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam06 Apr 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

Section 143(3)Section 263Section 36

disallowed and added back to the income. 4. Aggrieved by the order of the A.O., the assessee went on appeal before the CIT(A) and the Ld. CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee following the real income theory and the decision of Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of UCO bank

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1,, KAKINADA vs. KPR AGROCHEM LIMITED, BALABHADRAPURAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in I

ITA 80/VIZ/2021[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Jun 2023AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.80/Viz/2021 & 81/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2017-18) Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Circle-1 D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Kakinada Balabhadrapuram East Godavari [Pan : Aadck0257B] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.221/Viz/2022 To 223/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Income Tax Balabhadrapuram Circle-1 East Godavari Kakinada [Pan : Aadck0257B] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar Shri A.Chakradhar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri On Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.03.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri ON Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 80I

221-223/Viz/2022 A.Y.2013-14 to 2017-18 M/s KPR Agrochem Ltd., East Godavari not necessary that exempt income should necessarily be included in a particular year’s income for the disallowance. The assessee further submitted that this would be truncated reading of section 14A and rule 8D particularly when rule 8D(1

KPR AGROCHEM LIMITED,BALABHADRAPURAM vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, KAKINADA

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in I

ITA 221/VIZ/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Jun 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.80/Viz/2021 & 81/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2017-18) Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Circle-1 D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Kakinada Balabhadrapuram East Godavari [Pan : Aadck0257B] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.221/Viz/2022 To 223/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Income Tax Balabhadrapuram Circle-1 East Godavari Kakinada [Pan : Aadck0257B] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar Shri A.Chakradhar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri On Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.03.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri ON Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 80I

221-223/Viz/2022 A.Y.2013-14 to 2017-18 M/s KPR Agrochem Ltd., East Godavari not necessary that exempt income should necessarily be included in a particular year’s income for the disallowance. The assessee further submitted that this would be truncated reading of section 14A and rule 8D particularly when rule 8D(1

KPR AGROCHEM LIMITED,BALABHADRAPURAM vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, KAKINADA

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in I

ITA 223/VIZ/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Jun 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.80/Viz/2021 & 81/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2017-18) Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Circle-1 D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Kakinada Balabhadrapuram East Godavari [Pan : Aadck0257B] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.221/Viz/2022 To 223/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Income Tax Balabhadrapuram Circle-1 East Godavari Kakinada [Pan : Aadck0257B] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar Shri A.Chakradhar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri On Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.03.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri ON Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 80I

221-223/Viz/2022 A.Y.2013-14 to 2017-18 M/s KPR Agrochem Ltd., East Godavari not necessary that exempt income should necessarily be included in a particular year’s income for the disallowance. The assessee further submitted that this would be truncated reading of section 14A and rule 8D particularly when rule 8D(1

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , KAKINADA vs. KPR AGROCHEM LIMITED, BALABHADRAPURAM

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in I

ITA 81/VIZ/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Jun 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.80/Viz/2021 & 81/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2017-18) Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Circle-1 D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Kakinada Balabhadrapuram East Godavari [Pan : Aadck0257B] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.221/Viz/2022 To 223/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Income Tax Balabhadrapuram Circle-1 East Godavari Kakinada [Pan : Aadck0257B] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar Shri A.Chakradhar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri On Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.03.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri ON Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 80I

221-223/Viz/2022 A.Y.2013-14 to 2017-18 M/s KPR Agrochem Ltd., East Godavari not necessary that exempt income should necessarily be included in a particular year’s income for the disallowance. The assessee further submitted that this would be truncated reading of section 14A and rule 8D particularly when rule 8D(1

KPR AGROCHEM LIMITED,BALABHADRAPURAM vs. DCIT CIRCLE-1, KAKINADA

In the result, appeals filed by the revenue in I

ITA 222/VIZ/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Jun 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.80/Viz/2021 & 81/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2016-17 & 2017-18) Dy.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Circle-1 D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Kakinada Balabhadrapuram East Godavari [Pan : Aadck0257B] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.221/Viz/2022 To 223/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2013-14, 2014-15 & 2015-16) M/S K.P.R.Agrochem Ltd Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of D.No.8-256, Tata Nagar Income Tax Balabhadrapuram Circle-1 East Godavari Kakinada [Pan : Aadck0257B] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar Shri A.Chakradhar, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri On Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 20.03.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri ON Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 143(2)Section 14ASection 80I

221-223/Viz/2022 A.Y.2013-14 to 2017-18 M/s KPR Agrochem Ltd., East Godavari not necessary that exempt income should necessarily be included in a particular year’s income for the disallowance. The assessee further submitted that this would be truncated reading of section 14A and rule 8D particularly when rule 8D(1

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), , VIJAYAWADA vs. CARE AND SHARE CHARITABLE TRUST, , VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

ITA 337/VIZ/2019[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam03 Jun 2020AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri S.R.S. Narayan, CIT DR
Section 12A

221 and Girls: 108) in the school with a staff of 25 (Men: 11 and Women: 14) 7.7 Night Shelter: The Night Shelter for boys is run in a school building of the Vijayawada Municipal Corporation near the Benz Circle area. This provides a rof over their heads for boys who are on the streets. n opportunity for boys

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GATEWAY EAST INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 38/VIZ/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Jul 2023AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Fenil Amit Bhatt, ARFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 129Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 80I

section 129 of the Act, fresh opportunity of being heard was accorded to the assessee vide letter dated 06/08/2019. Subsequently, notice U/s. 142(1) of the Act along with the detailed questionnaire was issued to the assessee on 30/08/2019 calling for detailed information. In response, the assessee furnished its submissions from time to time. On perusal of the submissions

DEVI SEA FOODS LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 75/VIZ/2022[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Sept 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.75/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S. Devi Sea Foods Limited, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Visakhapatnam. Income Tax, Pan: Aabcd 0248 B Circle-3(1), Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant By : Sri D. Anand, Advocate ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Respondent By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Sri D. Anand, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 144CSection 144C(5)Section 14ASection 154Section 50Section 92BSection 92C

1% on the corporate guarantee given to AEs. The Ld. DR further submitted that the Ld. DRP has rightly considered the Notification (supra) and thereby upheld the ALP rate of 1.9% 14 adopted by the Ld. TPO in respect of adjustment made to the corporate guarantee given to AE. The Ld. DR therefore pleaded that the order of the Ld.DRP