Search: disallowance

22 results for “disallowance”+ Section 197clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)23 Section 4018 Section 14A18 Section 3514 Disallowance12 Section 26310 Section 12A8 Addition to Income8 Deduction7

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , KAKINADA vs. CRESCO TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED, BALABADRAPURAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 513/VIZ/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam11 Dec 2019AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleacit, Circle-1, Vs. M/S. Cresco Technology Pvt. Kakinada. Ltd., D.No. 8-256, Tata Nagar, Balabadrapuram, East Godavari District. Pan No. Aaacc 9848 F (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR

Section 14Section 14A

disallowance ultimately directed works out to nearly 110% of that sum, i.e., Rs.52,56,197/-. By no stretch of imagination can Section

RKR INVESTMENTS SERVICES(P) LTD,YEDITHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, , KAKINDA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Showing 1–20 of 22 · Page 1 of 2

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , KAKINADA vs. CRESCO TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED, BALABADRAPURAM

RKR INVESTMENTS SERVICES(P) LTD,YEDITHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, , KAKINDA

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , KAKINADA vs. CRESCO TECHNOLOGY PRIVATE LIMITED, BALABADRAPURAM

RKR INVESTMENTS SERVICES(P) LTD,YEDITHA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, , KAKINDA

VIKAS EDUCATRIONAL SOCIETY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO, WARD - 3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

VIKAS EDUCATRIONAL SOCIETY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO, WARD - 3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PRIVATE LIMITED,,RAJAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-4(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

ACIT, CIRCLE-4(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PVT. LTD,, RAJAM

THE DCIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE MILLS PVT LTD,, SRIKAKULAM

SRI VARALAKSHMI JUTE TWINE MILLS PVT. LTD.,,RAJAM vs. THE ITO,, SRIKAKULAM

ARRDY ENGINEERING INNOVATINS (P) LTD,ROURKELA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM., VISAKHAPATNAM

ARRDY ENGINNERING INNOVATIONS (P) LTD,ROURKELA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM., VISAKHAPATNAM

INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SARIPALLI VIMALA DEVI, VISAKHAPATNAM

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVE,,GUNTUR vs. THE CIT (A),-3,, VISAKHAPATNAM

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVE,,GUNTUR vs. THE CIT (A),-3,, VISAKHAPATNAM

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVE,,GUNTUR vs. THE CIT (A),-3,, VISAKHAPATNAM

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVE,,GUNTUR vs. THE CIT (A),-3,, VISAKHAPATNAM

ARUNACHALAM MANICKAVE,,GUNTUR vs. THE CIT (A),-3,, VISAKHAPATNAM

APEX FOUNDATION,PANASAPADU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU vs. SIRIUS OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED, TANUKU

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU vs. SIRIUS OVERSEAS PRIVATE LIMITED, TANUKU

BLUE PARK SEA FOODS PRIVATE LIMITED.,BHIMAVARAM vs. DY CIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA