NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) was conducted in the case of the assessee on 11.03.2022 by investigation wing. The case then centralized by taking approval from the appropriate authorities. During the course of survey, it was noticed that assessee maintains separate cash book only for the cash receipts. The survey team informed that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) was conducted in the case of the assessee on 11.03.2022 by investigation wing. The case then centralized by taking approval from the appropriate authorities. During the course of survey, it was noticed that assessee maintains separate cash book only for the cash receipts. The survey team informed that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VIJAYAWADA vs. NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) was conducted in the case of the assessee on 11.03.2022 by investigation wing. The case then centralized by taking approval from the appropriate authorities. During the course of survey, it was noticed that assessee maintains separate cash book only for the cash receipts. The survey team informed that

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) was conducted in the case of the assessee on 11.03.2022 by investigation wing. The case then centralized by taking approval from the appropriate authorities. During the course of survey, it was noticed that assessee maintains separate cash book only for the cash receipts. The survey team informed that

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) was conducted in the case of the assessee on 11.03.2022 by investigation wing. The case then centralized by taking approval from the appropriate authorities. During the course of survey, it was noticed that assessee maintains separate cash book only for the cash receipts. The survey team informed that

NS HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VIJAYAWADA

In the results, appeals filed by the revenue in ITA Nos

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133(A) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) was conducted in the case of the assessee on 11.03.2022 by investigation wing. The case then centralized by taking approval from the appropriate authorities. During the course of survey, it was noticed that assessee maintains separate cash book only for the cash receipts. The survey team informed that

ZOYEB HYDERABADWALA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(2), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.433/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2018-19) Zoyeb Hyderabadwala V. Income Tax Officer – Ward – 1 27-32-9, Ground Floor Direct Taxes Building 75 Feet Road Mvp Double Road Visakhapatnam - 530001 Besides Gayatri College Mvp Colony [Pan: Aaapz3387M] Visakhapatnam - 530017 (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 133(6) of the Act only partial information has been submitted by the various parties. Further we also do not agree with the arguments of the Ld.AR that the Ld. AO has not conducted any enquiries. Ld.AO has proceeded based on the replies given by the various parties wherein Ld. AO has recorded his observations party wise

WALTAIR TRADERS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NEAC, DELHI

sections": ["133(6)", "69C", "68", "194A", "194C", "143(3)", "142(1)", "69"], "issues": "The primary issues revolve around the genuineness of purchases, unexplained expenditures, correct accounting of interest income, treatment of contract receipts and cash deposits, and disallowance

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

disallowed only 8% of the bogus purchases by\nestimating the profits @8% of the bogus purchases. He therefore pleaded that\nthe order of the Ld. AO be restored.\n9.\nPer contra, Ld. Authorised Representative [hereinafter “Ld.AR"]\nsubmitted that Ld. AO has made the additions based on the statements recorded\nunder section 133

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

disallowed only 8% of the bogus purchases by\nestimating the profits @8% of the bogus purchases. He therefore pleaded that\nthe order of the Ld. AO be restored.\n9.\nPer contra, Ld. Authorised Representative [hereinafter “Ld.AR"]\nsubmitted that Ld. AO has made the additions based on the statements recorded\nunder section 133

NIKHIL CONSTRUCTIONS, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2), , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133 & 139/Viz/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12) Nikhil Constructions, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-3(2), PAN: AAGFN 7160 A Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : None ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent by : Shri Sankar Pandi, Sr. AR सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing : 04/01/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date

NIKHIL CONSTRUCTIONS, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133 & 139/Viz/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12) Nikhil Constructions, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-3(2), PAN: AAGFN 7160 A Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : None ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent by : Shri Sankar Pandi, Sr. AR सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing : 04/01/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date

NIKHIL CONSTRUCTIONS, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133 & 139/Viz/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12) Nikhil Constructions, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-3(2), PAN: AAGFN 7160 A Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : None ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent by : Shri Sankar Pandi, Sr. AR सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing : 04/01/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date

NIKHIL CONSTRUCTIONS,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(2),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA No

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

133 & 139/Viz/2019 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year :2011-12) Nikhil Constructions, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Visakhapatnam. Ward-3(2), PAN: AAGFN 7160 A Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant by : None ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent by : Shri Sankar Pandi, Sr. AR सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date of Hearing : 04/01/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GVA INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., DHAMTARI

disallowed only 8% of the bogus purchases by\nestimating the profits @8% of the bogus purchases. He therefore pleaded that\nthe order of the Ld. AO be restored.\n9.\nPer contra, Ld. Authorised Representative [hereinafter “Ld.AR"]\nsubmitted that Ld. AO has made the additions based on the statements recorded\nunder section 133

DEVI SEA FOODS LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , CIRCLE -3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.156/Viz/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) M/S Devi Sea Foods Limited Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of 50-1-51/1, A.S.R.Nagar Income Tax Seethammadhara Circle-3(I) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aabcd0248B] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri D.Anand, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri M.N.Murthy Naik, Cit(Dr) सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 01.12.2022 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.12.2022 O R D E R Per Shri S.Balakrishnan:

disallowance as per Rule 8D of I.T.Rules, 1962. Aggrieved by the order passed by the AO based on the directions of the Ld.DRP, the assessee is in appeal before us and raised the following grounds : 1. The Final Assessment order incorporating Transfer Pricing adjustment passed by the learned Assessing Officer 4 ITA No.156/Viz/2022, A.Y.2018-19 Devi Sea Foods Limited, Visakhapatnam

GVA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHHATTISGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

disallowed only 8% of the bogus purchases by\nestimating the profits @8% of the bogus purchases. He therefore pleaded that\nthe order of the Ld. AO be restored.\n9.\nPer contra, Ld. Authorised Representative [hereinafter “Ld.AR"]\nsubmitted that Ld. AO has made the additions based on the statements recorded\nunder section 133

GVA INDUSTRIES PRIVATE LIMITED,CHHATTISGARH vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

disallowed only 8% of the bogus purchases by\nestimating the profits @8% of the bogus purchases. He therefore pleaded that\nthe order of the Ld. AO be restored.\n9.\nPer contra, Ld. Authorised Representative [hereinafter “Ld.AR"]\nsubmitted that Ld. AO has made the additions based on the statements recorded\nunder section 133