PANDALAPAKA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OP CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,EAST GODAVARI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER-WARD-1, KAKINADA

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.437 & 438/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2018-19 & 2020-21) Pandalapaka Primary Agricultural V. Income Tax Officer – Ward – 1 Income Tax Office Co-Op Credit Society Ltd., 3Rd Floor, Deepthi Towers 5-28/1, Pandalapaka Main Road, Kakinada – 533001 Biccavole Mandal – 533345 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aabap2382G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

10A or section 10AA or section 10B or section 10BA or under any provision of this Chapter under the heading "C.— Deductions in respect of certain incomes", no deduction shall be allowed to him thereunder.” 18. From the bare reading of the above sub-section 5 of the Act, no deduction shall be allowed to assessee under any provision

SREE SHANTINATH MUNISUVARAT SWAMY RAJENDRA SURI JAIN TRUST,TANUKU vs. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD, TANUKU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon'Ble

disallowed the claim of the appellant in accordance with the provisions of Section 80A(5) of the Act. It is further submitted that in accordance with the provisions of Section 80A(5) of the Act, where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under section 10A or section 10AA or section

M/S. MAHATI SOFTWARE PVT. LTD.,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.67/Viz/2016 & 68/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2011-12 & 2012-13) M/S Mahati Software Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of D.No.10-27-14A Income Tax Sivam, Kailashmetta Circle-3(1) Waltair Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aadcm9620J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 2(24)(x) and accordingly disallowed a sum of Rs.9,77,039/- u/s 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act. The Ld.DRP upheld the addition made by the AO on objection filed before the DRP. 19. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing

MAHATI SOFTWARE PVT LTD.,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.67/Viz/2016 & 68/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2011-12 & 2012-13) M/S Mahati Software Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of D.No.10-27-14A Income Tax Sivam, Kailashmetta Circle-3(1) Waltair Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aadcm9620J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 2(24)(x) and accordingly disallowed a sum of Rs.9,77,039/- u/s 36(1)(va) r.w.s. 2(24)(x) of the Act. The Ld.DRP upheld the addition made by the AO on objection filed before the DRP. 19. Aggrieved by the order of the AO, the assessee is in appeal before this Tribunal. During the appeal hearing

KONIZERLA SRI TILAK PACS, KRISHNA DIST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(5), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.136/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Konizerla Sri Tilak Pacs, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 1-126 Konizerla, Penugolanu Ward-3(5), Post, Gampalagudem Mandal, Vijayawada. Krishna District, Andhr Pradesh. Pan: Aabak2512K (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri C. Subrahmanyam, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 18/07/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 14/08/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s. 80P of the Act. Section 80A(5) of the Act is extracted below for reference: “Sec. 80A (5) Where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under section 10A or section 10AA or section 10B or section 10BA or under any provision of this Chapter under

OMMI SANDEEP,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

Bench: Shri Sandeep Singh Karhail, Hon'Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon'Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 247/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ष/ Assessment Year:2017-18) The Chinnampeta Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Limited Chinnampeta Village Chinnampeta Post, Chatrai Mandal Krishna – 521214, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aacat7997E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) करदाता का प्रतिनिधित्व / Assessee Represented By राजस्व का प्रतिनिधित्व / Department Represented By सुनवाई समाप्त होने की तिथि/ Date Of Conclusion Of Hearing घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement V. Income Tax Officer, Ward – 3(5) C.R. Building, 1St Floor Annex M.G. Road, Vijayawada Andhra Pradesh (प्रत्यर्थी / Respondent) Shri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr.Ar 16.12.2025 24.02.2026 आदेश /Order Per Omkareshwar Chidara: 1. The Present Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Impugned Order Dated 31.10.2025, Passed Under Section 250 Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short 'Act') By The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre, Delhi [Hereinafter In Short “Ld.Cit(A)”], For The A.Y. 2017-18.

2. Decision of Hon'ble ITAT, Visakhapatnam in the case of Maruthi Primary Agricultural Cooperative Credit Society Ltd. Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward-3(5), Vijayawada, Vide ITA No. 151/VIZ/2022 for the A.Y. 2017-18. 3. Decision of Hon'ble ITAT, Visakhapatnam in the case of The Narasimha Rao Palem Primary Agricultural Credit Society Ltd Vs Income Tax Officer, Ward

CHANUBANDA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,KRISHNA DIST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(5), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.152/Viz/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2017-18) The Chanubanda Primary Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Cooperative Credit Ward-3(5), Society Limited, Chanubanda Vijayawada. Village, Chatrai Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh–521214. Pan: Aacat 7978 H (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Asrss Siva Prasad, Ar प्रत्यधर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s. 80P of the Act. Section 80A(5) of the Act is extracted below for reference: “Sec. 80A (5) Where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under section 10A or section 10AA or section 10B or section 10BA or under any provision of this Chapter under

KANASAPALLI PACS LTD,KANASAPALLI vs. ITO, WARD-3(4), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.125/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Kanasanapalli Pacs Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer, Kanasanapalli Post, Ward-3(4), Agiripalli Mandal, Vijayawada. Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh-521212. Pan: Aabak 4998 F (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Asrss Siva Prasad, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s. 80P of the Act. Section 80A(5) of the Act is extracted below for reference: “Sec. 80A (5) Where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under section 10A or section 10AA or section 10B or section 10BA or under any provision of this Chapter under

THE KONAYAPALEM PACS LTD.,CHANDARLAPADU MANDAL vs. ITO, WARD-1(3), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.126/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2017-18) The Konayapalem Primary Vs. Income Tax Officer, Agricultural Cooperative Credit Ward-(3), Society Limited, Konayapalem Vijayawada. Village, Chandarlapadu Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh – 521182. Pan: Aacat 6987 G (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Asrss Siva Prasad, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s. 80P of the Act. Section 80A(5) of the Act is extracted below for reference: “Sec. 80A (5) Where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under section 10A or section 10AA or section 10B or section 10BA or under any provision of this Chapter under

NARASIMHA RAO PALEM PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,KRISHNA DIST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.211/Viz/2023 (धनिाारण िर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18) The Narasimha Rao Palem Vs. Income Tax Officer, Primary Agricultural Credit Ward-3(3), Society Limited, Vijayawada. Krishna District – 521214. Pan: Aacat7998M (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca प्रत्यार्थी की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनिाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 07/05/2025 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of : 20/05/2025 Pronouncement O R D E R

disallowed the claim of deduction u/s. 80P of the Act. Section 80A(5) of the Act is extracted below for reference: Section 80A(5) of the Act is extracted below for reference: “Sec. 80A (5) Where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction under section 10A or section 10AA or section

THE CHANDARLAPDU LARGE SIZE COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,CHANDARLAPADU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(3), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Veeravalli Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.11/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) The Chandarlapdu Large Size V. Income Tax Officer – Ward – 1(3) C.R. Building, 1St Floor Annex. Cooperative Credit Society Limited 2-10, Society Building M.G. Road, Vijayawada – 520002 Bobbilapadu Road, Chandarlapadu Post Mandal Andhra Pradesh Krishna District – 521182, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aacat7616A] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee. The Ld. AO arrived at this conclusion by treating the return of income filed belatedly as invalid and non-est. Section 80A(5) and Section 80AC of the Act are reproduced herein below for reference: “80A(5) Where the assessee fails to make a claim in his return of income for any deduction

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10A, hence, argued that on merits also, the assessee’s case deserves to be dismissed. 8. We have heard rival contentions and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. In this case, the assessee filed the returns of income and declared the exports and claimed the deduction u/s 10A in respect

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10A, hence, argued that on merits also, the assessee’s case deserves to be dismissed. 8. We have heard rival contentions and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. In this case, the assessee filed the returns of income and declared the exports and claimed the deduction u/s 10A in respect

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. FIRST TEK PVT.LTD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of .11.2020 Pronouncement

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10A, hence, argued that on merits also, the assessee’s case deserves to be dismissed. 8. We have heard rival contentions and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. In this case, the assessee filed the returns of income and declared the exports and claimed the deduction u/s 10A in respect

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10A, hence, argued that on merits also, the assessee’s case deserves to be dismissed. 8. We have heard rival contentions and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. In this case, the assessee filed the returns of income and declared the exports and claimed the deduction u/s 10A in respect

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10A, hence, argued that on merits also, the assessee’s case deserves to be dismissed. 8. We have heard rival contentions and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. In this case, the assessee filed the returns of income and declared the exports and claimed the deduction u/s 10A in respect

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. FIRST TEK PVT.LTD, HYDERABAD

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of .11.2020 Pronouncement

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10A, hence, argued that on merits also, the assessee’s case deserves to be dismissed. 8. We have heard rival contentions and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. In this case, the assessee filed the returns of income and declared the exports and claimed the deduction u/s 10A in respect

FIRST TEK PRIVATE LIMITED,HYDERABAD vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, VIJAYAWADA

In the result appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.574-577/Viz/2019 & 609/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08 To 2010-11 & 2011-12) M/S First Tek Private Limited Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Income Tax Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Central Circle Main Road, Piduguralla Vijayawada Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.607/Viz/2019 & 608/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2009-10 & 2011-2012) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S First Tek Private Limited Income Tax Bhavanasi Anjaneyulu Central Circle Sri Balaji Chemical Industries Vijayawada Main Road, Piduguralla Guntur [Pan : Aaacf8840N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 23.09.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of 24.11.2020 Pronouncement

disallowed the deduction claimed by the assessee u/s 10A, hence, argued that on merits also, the assessee’s case deserves to be dismissed. 8. We have heard rival contentions and gone through the orders of the lower authorities. In this case, the assessee filed the returns of income and declared the exports and claimed the deduction u/s 10A in respect