BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

9 results for “disallowance”+ Deemed Dividendclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,008Delhi472Chennai172Bangalore144Ahmedabad123Cochin114Kolkata113Pune87Hyderabad77Chandigarh75Jaipur75Raipur58Lucknow31Nagpur24Indore23SC22Surat18Guwahati11Visakhapatnam9Rajkot8Panaji7Jabalpur5Cuttack4Jodhpur3Agra3Amritsar2Dehradun2A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1Ranchi1ASHOK BHAN DALVEER BHANDARI1

Key Topics

Section 80P(2)(a)15Section 80P12Section 271(1)(c)8Section 143(3)7Section 148A6Addition to Income5Deduction5Disallowance5Section 148

VENKATA RAMA SATYANARAYANA VARMA VEGESNA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT/ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 165/VIZ/2022[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Jul 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.165/Viz/2022 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12) Venkata Rama Satyanarayana Varma Vs. National E-Assesment Centre, Vegesna Delhi 10-50-2, Lazarus Bangalow (Dcit/Acit Waltair Main Road Circle-3(1) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam) [Pan : Aagts9608E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shrin C.M.Ravi Prasad, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri On Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 24.04.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement 14.07.2023 : आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi In Din & Order No. Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022- 23/1043814974(1) Dated 12.07.2022, Arising Out Of The Assessment Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (Ao) U/S 271(1)(C) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short “Act”) Dated 14.02.2022 For The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2011-12. 2

For Appellant: Shrin C.M.Ravi Prasad, ARFor Respondent: Shri ON Hari Prasada Rao, DR
Section 143(3)Section 2(22)(e)Section 271(1)(c)

deemed dividend, i.e. Rs. 6,18,000/- has been levied which is ot justified on the part of the Assessing Officer and confirming of the said addition / disallowance

3
Section 80P(2)3
Section 2(22)(e)3
Business Income3

DCIT, CIRCLE -3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NORD ANGLIA EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue, viz

ITA 314/VIZ/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Nov 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: 1.Shri Karnjot Singh KhuranaFor Respondent: Shri Badicala Yadagiri, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

dividend income of Rs. 20,585/-. The AO held a conviction that, as the assessee company had maintained a common Profit & Loss account for all its activities, therefore, debiting of certain expenses attributable to the exempt income yielding investments, viz. (i). Private Limited vs. DCIT making of fresh investments; (ii). maintaining or continuing with the existing portfolio of investments

DCIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NORD ANGLIA EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue, viz

ITA 206/VIZ/2025[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Nov 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: 1.Shri Karnjot Singh KhuranaFor Respondent: Shri Badicala Yadagiri, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

dividend income of Rs. 20,585/-. The AO held a conviction that, as the assessee company had maintained a common Profit & Loss account for all its activities, therefore, debiting of certain expenses attributable to the exempt income yielding investments, viz. (i). Private Limited vs. DCIT making of fresh investments; (ii). maintaining or continuing with the existing portfolio of investments

DCIT, CIRCLE - 3(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NORD ANGLIA EDUCATION INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 205/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Nov 2025AY 2017-18
For Appellant: 1.Shri Karnjot Singh KhuranaFor Respondent: Shri Badicala Yadagiri, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)

dividend income of Rs. 20,585/-. The AO held a\nconviction that, as the assessee company had maintained a common\nProfit & Loss account for all its activities, therefore, debiting of certain\nexpenses attributable to the exempt income yielding investments, viz. (i).\n13\nITA No.314 & 206/Viz/2025\nITA No. 205/Viz/2024\nNord Anglia Education Infrastructure\nPrivate Limited vs. DCIT T\nmaking of fresh

GMEDAPADU PACS,GMEDAPADU vs. ITO, WARD-1, KAKINADA

ITA 574/VIZ/2025[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam19 Nov 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.574/Viz/2025 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2020-21) G Medapadu Pacs, Vs. Income Tax Officer, East Godavari District, Ward-1, Andhra Pradesh. Kakinada. Pan: Aaaag8455A (Appellant) (Respondent) "नधा"रती "वारा/Assessee By: Sri Kss Sarma, Ca राज" व "वारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख/Date Of 16/10/2025 Hearing: घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of 14/11/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M:

For Appellant: Sri KSS Sarma, CAFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 143(3)Section 80PSection 80P(2)(a)Section 80P(2)(d)

disallowances and dismissed the 4 G MEDAPADU PACS vs. ITO appeal. For the sake of clarity, we deem it apposite to cull out the observations of the CIT(A), as under: 5.0 Findings and Decision: - 5.1 Ground 1: 1. The assessing officer has erred in treating the paddy procurement commission received by the assessee-society, as the income from

PANDALAPAKA PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL CO-OP SOCIETY LTD,EAST GODAVARI vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KAKINADA

ITA 438/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Jan 2025AY 2020-21
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 148ASection 80P

deemed to have been inhibited from acting in pursuance\nof the section 148A(b) notice till the relevant material was supplied to the\nassessees. Ld.AR also placed reliance in the case of Anurag Gupta v. ITO by\nthe Hon'ble Bombay High Court in Writ Pet No. 10184 of 2022 dated\n13.03.2023 wherein it was held that issuance of notice

THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT TRUST EMPLOYEES CREDIT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 534/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: Billapati & Co., ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr DR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance. 4. Submission of the learned AR is that the assessee is an employees’ Cooperative Society as is evident from the registration of the society, funds deposited are the own funds of the assessee, namely, the surplus funds which are not to be utilised in the near future in the nationalised bank and, therefore, such deposit has nexus with

THE TELECOM OFFICERS & BSNL NON EXECUTIVE EMPLOYEES COOP CR SOCIETY LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 431/VIZ/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam25 Nov 2024AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary & Shri S. Balakrishnan

For Appellant: Shri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowance. 4. Submission of the learned AR is that the assessee is a Credit Cooperative Society as is evident from the registration of the society, funds deposited are the own funds of the assessee, namely, the surplus funds which are not to be utilised in the near future in the nationalised bank and, therefore, such deposit has nexus with

THE CHEBROLE LARGE SIZED CO-OP SOCIETY LIMITED,NARAYANAPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, ELURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 36/VIZ/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 143(3)Section 263Section 80PSection 80P(2)Section 80P(2)(a)

disallowing the interest income earned from the fixed deposits made in the District Central co-operative bank. 4. Submission of the learned AR is that the assessee is an Agricultural Cooperative Society as is evident from the registration of the society, funds deposited are the own funds of the assessee, namely, the surplus funds which are not to be utilised