SYED IRFAN HAZARI,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), GUNTUR

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

condone the delay of 32 days in filing the appeal. 3. Any other ground that may be urged at the time of appeal hearing. 3. Succinctly stated, the A.O., based on information received from the Income Tax Officer (Investigation), Unit–4, Vijayawada, vide his letter dated 04.02.2019, observed that the assessee had made cash deposits

SRI SURYATEJA CONSTRUCTIONS,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.124/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2016-17) Sri Suryateja Constructions, Vs. Deputy / Assistant 30-22-80, Shop No. 6G, Kp Commissioner Of Income Tax, Towers, Eluru Road, Durga Circle-1(1), Agraharam, Vijayawada-520002. Vijayawada. Pan: Acdfs2608B (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.123/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2016-17) Sri Suryateja Constructions, Vs. Deputy / Assistant 30-22-80, Shop No. 6G, Kp Commissioner Of Income Tax, Towers, Eluru Road, Durga Circle-2(1), Agraharam, Vijayawada-520002. Vijayawada. Pan: Acdfs2608B (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar प्रत्यधर्थी की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 19/06/2024 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of : 24/07/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R Per S. Balakrishnan: Both The Captioned Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

disallowing 10% of expenditure claimed under various heads to the tune of Rs. 10,05,440/-. Later on the 3 Department observed as per the information available from AIMS (NMS) that during the FY 2015-16 relevant to the AY 2016-17, the assessee has short computed the income of Rs. 4,52,24,480/- by excess computing the cost

SRI SURYATEJA CONSTRUCTIONS,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX ,CIRCLE - 2(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.124/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2016-17) Sri Suryateja Constructions, Vs. Deputy / Assistant 30-22-80, Shop No. 6G, Kp Commissioner Of Income Tax, Towers, Eluru Road, Durga Circle-1(1), Agraharam, Vijayawada-520002. Vijayawada. Pan: Acdfs2608B (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.123/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :2016-17) Sri Suryateja Constructions, Vs. Deputy / Assistant 30-22-80, Shop No. 6G, Kp Commissioner Of Income Tax, Towers, Eluru Road, Durga Circle-2(1), Agraharam, Vijayawada-520002. Vijayawada. Pan: Acdfs2608B (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar प्रत्यधर्थी की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 19/06/2024 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of : 24/07/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R Per S. Balakrishnan: Both The Captioned Appeals Are Filed By The Assessee Against The Orders Of The Learned Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)

disallowing 10% of expenditure claimed under various heads to the tune of Rs. 10,05,440/-. Later on the 3 Department observed as per the information available from AIMS (NMS) that during the FY 2015-16 relevant to the AY 2016-17, the assessee has short computed the income of Rs. 4,52,24,480/- by excess computing the cost

SREE ANANTALAKSHMI TEXTILES PVT LTD,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, ELURU

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.402/Viz/2025 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2020-21) Sree Anantalakshmi Textiles (P) Ltd., Vs. Income Tax Officer – Tds Ward-1 C/O. Nsl Textiles Limited Income Tax Office, Kks Towers Engee House, 3Rd Floor, 4Th Line R.R. Pet, Eluru – 534002 Chadramouli Nagar, Guntur – 522007 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aadcs1442E] (अपीलधर्थी/Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate : Dr. Aparna Villuri,Sr.Ar राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By सुिवाई समाप्त होिे की ततति/ Date Of Conclusion Of Hearing : 25.09.2025 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 08.10.2025

condone the delay of 20 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits in the following paragraphs. 4. Brief facts of the case are that, assessee is a private limited company engaged in the business of manufacturing of cotton yarn and filed its original return of income declaring a total loss

THE TENALI PT EMPLOYEES MUTUALLY AIDED CO OP THRIFT CREDIT SOCIETY LTD,TENALI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TENALI

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआईटीए. नं. / Ita No. 361/Viz/2025 (A.Y. 2019-20) The Tenali P & T Employees V. Income Tax Officer - Ward – 1 Mutually Aided Co-Op Thrift & Income Tax Office Credit Society Limited Opp. Sai Baba Temple, Bose Road D.No. 22-5-60, Sarojini Naidu Street Tenali – 522201, Andhra Pradesh Tanali – 522201 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aacat9757E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

condonation of delay. Page No. 2 The Tenali P & T Employees Mutually Aided Co-Op thrift & Credit Society Limited 4. We have heard both the sides and perused the material available on record. The reasons for delay in filing the appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) are reproduced below: - 1. In the case of appellant, the Intimation

GAJULLANKA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO OP SOCIETY,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TENALI

In the result, all the four appeals of the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaraआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.495 To 498/Viz./2025 Assessment Years 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Gajullanka Primary The Income Tax Officer, Agriculture Co-Op Ward-1, Tenali. Society,Avulavaripalem, Vs. Pin – 522 201. Kolluru Mandal, Guntur State Of Andhra District – 522 324. Pradesh Pan Bgapm1891G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee By: Sri C Subrahmanyam, Ca [Hybrid Mode] राज" व "ारा /Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 22.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 22.01.2026 आदेश/Order

condoning the delay by 94 days, ignoring the bonafide reasons and medical evidence submitted by the appellant, and failed to appreciate that the delay was due to unforeseen medical 6 ITA.Nos.495 to 498/VIZ./2025 emergency of the Secretary of the rural Co-operative Society, constituting sufficient cause under Section 249(3) of the Act. 3. The Learned

GAJULLANKA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO OP SOCIETY,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TENALI

In the result, all the four appeals of the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaraआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.495 To 498/Viz./2025 Assessment Years 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Gajullanka Primary The Income Tax Officer, Agriculture Co-Op Ward-1, Tenali. Society,Avulavaripalem, Vs. Pin – 522 201. Kolluru Mandal, Guntur State Of Andhra District – 522 324. Pradesh Pan Bgapm1891G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee By: Sri C Subrahmanyam, Ca [Hybrid Mode] राज" व "ारा /Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 22.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 22.01.2026 आदेश/Order

condoning the delay by 94 days, ignoring the bonafide reasons and medical evidence submitted by the appellant, and failed to appreciate that the delay was due to unforeseen medical 6 ITA.Nos.495 to 498/VIZ./2025 emergency of the Secretary of the rural Co-operative Society, constituting sufficient cause under Section 249(3) of the Act. 3. The Learned

GAJULLANKA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO OP SOCIETY,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TENALI

In the result, all the four appeals of the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaraआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.495 To 498/Viz./2025 Assessment Years 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Gajullanka Primary The Income Tax Officer, Agriculture Co-Op Ward-1, Tenali. Society,Avulavaripalem, Vs. Pin – 522 201. Kolluru Mandal, Guntur State Of Andhra District – 522 324. Pradesh Pan Bgapm1891G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee By: Sri C Subrahmanyam, Ca [Hybrid Mode] राज" व "ारा /Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 22.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 22.01.2026 आदेश/Order

condoning the delay by 94 days, ignoring the bonafide reasons and medical evidence submitted by the appellant, and failed to appreciate that the delay was due to unforeseen medical 6 ITA.Nos.495 to 498/VIZ./2025 emergency of the Secretary of the rural Co-operative Society, constituting sufficient cause under Section 249(3) of the Act. 3. The Learned

GAJULLANKA PRIMARY AGRICULTURE CO OP SOCIETY,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TENALI

In the result, all the four appeals of the Assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao & Shri Omkareshwar Chidaraआ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos.495 To 498/Viz./2025 Assessment Years 2018-2019 & 2019-2020 Gajullanka Primary The Income Tax Officer, Agriculture Co-Op Ward-1, Tenali. Society,Avulavaripalem, Vs. Pin – 522 201. Kolluru Mandal, Guntur State Of Andhra District – 522 324. Pradesh Pan Bgapm1891G (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा /Assessee By: Sri C Subrahmanyam, Ca [Hybrid Mode] राज" व "ारा /Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 22.01.2026 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 22.01.2026 आदेश/Order

condoning the delay by 94 days, ignoring the bonafide reasons and medical evidence submitted by the appellant, and failed to appreciate that the delay was due to unforeseen medical 6 ITA.Nos.495 to 498/VIZ./2025 emergency of the Secretary of the rural Co-operative Society, constituting sufficient cause under Section 249(3) of the Act. 3. The Learned

ST. MARYS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL SOCIETY,NARASARAOPET vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION WARD), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.484 & 485/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) St. Marys English Medium School Society V. Ito (Exemption) Income Tax Office Main Road, Ravipadu Village Lakshmipuram Main Road Narasaraopet Mandal Guntur – 522006 Narasaraopet – 522604, Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aakts3349C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

condoning the delay in filing the appeal. 3. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ought to have held that the disallowance

ST. MARYS ENGLISH MEDIUM SCHOOL SOCIETY,NARASARAOPET vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, (EXEMPTION WARD), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.484 & 485/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) St. Marys English Medium School Society V. Ito (Exemption) Income Tax Office Main Road, Ravipadu Village Lakshmipuram Main Road Narasaraopet Mandal Guntur – 522006 Narasaraopet – 522604, Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aakts3349C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

condoning the delay in filing the appeal. 3. The learned Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) ought to have held that the disallowance

BAYYE CHANDRA KUMAR,WEST GODAVARI vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

Bench: Us:

disallowed 10% of the assessee's claim for deduction of purchase of metal of Rs. 2,41,97,970/- and worked out a consequential addition of Rs.24,19,797/-. Accordingly, the A.O., vide his order passed under Section 143(3), dated 12.12.2019, framed the assessment in the case of the assessee. 4. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal

TIRUMALASETTY NAGARAJU,GUNTUR vs. THE INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1),, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble(Through Hybrid Hearing) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A. No. 190/Viz/2025 (निर्गारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2013-14) Tirumalasetty Nagaraju, V. Income Tax Officer, Guntur. Ward-1(1), Guntur. Pan: Aeupn1070R (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

condone the delay and dismissing the appeal in limine. 3. Without prejudice to the above, the Ld. CIT(A) ought to have deleted the addition of Rs.33,53,005/- made by the AO towards disallowance

BOMBAY GASLIGHT STORES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT ,ACIT, CIRCLE 3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.55/Viz/2024 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) Bombay Gaslight Stores Vs. Dcit/Acit 10-1-27/A, Asilmetta Circle-3(1) Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaab0207B] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

disallowed deductions u/s 40(b)(iv) of the Act in respect of interest and remuneration paid to the partners and made addition of the same. 4. Aggrieved by the intimation u/s 143(1) of the Act, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) with the delay of 1008 days and filed condonation

PARASURAM KESARI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(4), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

delay, which was due to medical reasons when in fact a medical certificate was filed along with condonation petition, filed manually and also electronically. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) without considering the following grounds of appeal urged before him which he ought to have done so, disposed off the appeal upon which the assessee is aggrieved. “1. Disallowance

SIVANANDAGURU EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL TRUST,JAGGAYYAPET MANDAL vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 165/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19) Sivanandaguru Educational & Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Cultural Trust, Exemption Ward, D.No. 43-2, Balusupadu Village, Rajahmundry. Jaggayyapet Mandal, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh – 52115. Pan: Aadts4140A (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 25/06/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 14/08/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

disallowance made by the DDIT/ADIT- CPC, the assessee preferred an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC with a delay of 113 days, excluding the extended period granted by the Hon’ble Supreme Court due to COVID. 3. On appeal, before the Ld. CIT(A)-NFAC the assessee filed a petition for condonation

SAGARA VIKASA MUTUALLY AIDED CO OP THRIFT SOCIETY LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(5), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.122/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2018-19) Sagara Vikasa Mutually Aided Vs. Income Tax Officer, Coop Thrift Society Ltd, Ward-2(5), Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aacas9620H (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Smt A Aruna For Shri Gvn Hari ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

disallowed the assessee’s claim on the ground that the assessee has not filed its return of income within the prescribed time limit as prescribed U/s. 139(1) of the Act. On appeal, the Ld. CIT(A) has also upheld the decision of the Ld. AO. Subsequently, based on the assessee’s application for condonation of delay

SREERAMULU PENTAKOTA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-3(3), VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

disallowed to the extent of Page. No 2 I.T.A.No.555/VIZ/2025 Sreeramulu Pentakota Rs.2,36,32,250/- in the intimation issued by the A.O/CPC under section 143(1) of the Act dated 29.12.2020. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A). Ostensibly, as the assessee, despite having been offered seven opportunities, had failed to participate