BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

228 results for “disallowance”+ Cash Depositclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai3,048Delhi2,568Chennai995Kolkata916Bangalore743Ahmedabad706Jaipur652Hyderabad529Pune389Chandigarh287Indore285Surat235Visakhapatnam228Cochin217Rajkot176Raipur173Amritsar163Cuttack128Nagpur127Lucknow106Agra62Allahabad56Panaji55Jodhpur54Guwahati49Calcutta44Patna38Jabalpur28Karnataka25Dehradun24Telangana18Varanasi18SC16Ranchi16Kerala6Orissa3Himachal Pradesh2Punjab & Haryana1A.K. SIKRI N.V. RAMANA1A.K. SIKRI ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)72Addition to Income61Section 142(1)42Section 14835Section 143(2)35Cash Deposit30Disallowance27Section 133A25Section 271(1)(c)21

SRI DHARIPALLI SAMPATH,,WARANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 407/VIZ/2017[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V.Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 153A

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SAMPATH,, WRANGAL,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the A

Showing 1–20 of 228 · Page 1 of 12

...
Section 10A21
Condonation of Delay21
Survey u/s 133A18
ITA 411/VIZ/2017[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V.Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 153A

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SAMPATH,, ,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 409/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V.Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 153A

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SAMPATH,,,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 412/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V.Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 153A

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SAMPATH,,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 410/VIZ/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V.Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 153A

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SAMPATH,,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 408/VIZ/2017[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V.Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 153A

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SAMPATH,,WRANGAL vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 413/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V.Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132Section 143(2)Section 144Section 153A

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VITTALAM NATARAJ PRASAD, TIRUPATI

In the result, Cross Objection raised by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 247/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Pawan Chakrapani, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

cash deposits in bank accounts of Rs. 2,16,00,000/-. Grounds No. 6, 7 & 8 with respect to deletion of addition towards interest expenditure of Rs. 27,23,730/-. Grounds No.9, 10 & 11 relate to deletion of addition towards interest income from savings bank accounts of Rs. 11,65,279/-. Ground No.12 is a general ground. 26. The Grounds

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VITTALAM NATARAJ PRASAD, TIRUPATI

In the result, Cross Objection raised by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 1/VIZ/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Pawan Chakrapani, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

cash deposits in bank accounts of Rs. 2,16,00,000/-. Grounds No. 6, 7 & 8 with respect to deletion of addition towards interest expenditure of Rs. 27,23,730/-. Grounds No.9, 10 & 11 relate to deletion of addition towards interest income from savings bank accounts of Rs. 11,65,279/-. Ground No.12 is a general ground. 26. The Grounds

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NALLAMILLI SRIDEVI,, TIRUPATI

In the result, Cross Objection raised by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 3/VIZ/2021[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Pawan Chakrapani, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

cash deposits in bank accounts of Rs. 2,16,00,000/-. Grounds No. 6, 7 & 8 with respect to deletion of addition towards interest expenditure of Rs. 27,23,730/-. Grounds No.9, 10 & 11 relate to deletion of addition towards interest income from savings bank accounts of Rs. 11,65,279/-. Ground No.12 is a general ground. 26. The Grounds

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. NALLAMILLI SRIDEVI,, TIRUPATI

In the result, Cross Objection raised by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 2/VIZ/2021[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Mar 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri Pawan Chakrapani, CAFor Respondent: Sri MN Murthy Naik, CIT-DR
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)

cash deposits in bank accounts of Rs. 2,16,00,000/-. Grounds No. 6, 7 & 8 with respect to deletion of addition towards interest expenditure of Rs. 27,23,730/-. Grounds No.9, 10 & 11 relate to deletion of addition towards interest income from savings bank accounts of Rs. 11,65,279/-. Ground No.12 is a general ground. 26. The Grounds

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,, WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 419/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,, WARANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 417/VIZ/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WARANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 416/VIZ/2017[2008-2009]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2008-2009

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 418/VIZ/2017[2010-2011]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2010-2011

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WARANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 414/VIZ/2017[2006-2007]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2006-2007

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WARANGAL vs. ACIT,CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 415/VIZ/2017[2007-2008]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2007-2008

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

SRI DHARIPALLI SRIRAMULU,,WRANGAL vs. ACIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE -2,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee for the A

ITA 420/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam26 Oct 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Sri M.V. Anil Kumar, AR
Section 132(4)

cash deposited in bank account, the addition, is bad in law and may be deleted. 5. Your Appellant submits that CIT(A) and Assessing Officer erred in law and facts of the case in disallowing

PILLI NOOKA RAJU,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,. CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessees for the A

ITA 99/VIZ/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Apr 2023AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.101/Viz/2019 To 103/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 To 2010-11) Smt.Pilli Sujatha Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.45-57-10/1/1 Income Tax Narasimha Nagar Central Circle-2 Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Ajopp0031F] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.98/Viz/2019 To 100/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2013-14) Pilli Nooka Raju Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.45-57-10/1/1 Income Tax Narasimha Nagar Central Circle-2 Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Ahipp 3381L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.MurthyNaik,CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A

cash deposits and cheque deposits in assessee’s bank account amounting to Rs.25,57,294/-. We find from the table as extracted in Ld.AO’s order that the amount of Rs.15,00,000/- was included while disallowing

PILLI NOOKA RAJU,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,. CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the assessees for the A

ITA 98/VIZ/2019[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Apr 2023AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.101/Viz/2019 To 103/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2008-09 To 2010-11) Smt.Pilli Sujatha Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.45-57-10/1/1 Income Tax Narasimha Nagar Central Circle-2 Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Ajopp0031F] आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.98/Viz/2019 To 100/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2011-12 To 2013-14) Pilli Nooka Raju Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of D.No.45-57-10/1/1 Income Tax Narasimha Nagar Central Circle-2 Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Ahipp 3381L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Shri M.N.MurthyNaik,CIT(DR)
Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 153A

cash deposits and cheque deposits in assessee’s bank account amounting to Rs.25,57,294/-. We find from the table as extracted in Ld.AO’s order that the amount of Rs.15,00,000/- was included while disallowing