Search: depreciation

3 results for “depreciation”+ Section 50Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai156 Delhi75 Ahmedabad24 Kolkata21 Pune15 Jaipur13 Bangalore10 Guwahati9 Chandigarh9 Hyderabad9 Indore9 Chennai8 Raipur7 Lucknow5 Jodhpur4 Visakhapatnam3 Amritsar3 Rajkot2 Surat2 Nagpur1 Cochin1 Telangana1 Agra1

Key Topics

Section 50C12 Section 143(3)5 Section 36(1)(iii)2 Section 2(14)2 Deduction2 Capital Gains2

APPANA HARI NAGA VENKATA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO,, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 222/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam06 Feb 2019AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleappana Hari Naga Venkat Rao, Vs. Ito, Ward-1(4), D.No. 15-32-7, Gokul Road, Visakhapatnam. Maharanipeta, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Adopa 5287 G (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR

Section 143(3)Section 148Section 50CSection 54

section 50C(2) for making a reference to the DVO. It is pertinent to observe that the assessee entered into an agreement to sell on 8.2.2010. The AO has not disputed this agreement. The assessee has received payment in pursuance of this agreement through account payee cheque. Let us take a situation where a vendee fails to get the sale

APPANA HARI NAGA VENKATA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO,, VISAKHAPATNAM

APPANA HARI NAGA VENKATA RAO,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO,, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI BHUPATHI RAJU RAVI VARMA, VISAKHAPATNAM

SRINIVASA HAIR INDUSTRIES,ELURU vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX., ELURU