VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

THE VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASST. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ADDL. CIT.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, , VISAKHAPTNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

b) The Ld. CIT(A) ought to have directed the Assessing Officer to allow the expenditure U/s. 37(1) of the Act. 6. Any other grounds that may be urged at the time of hearing.” 62. The assessee has also raised an additional ground in its appeal which reads as under: “On the facts and in the circumstances

CMR TRANSPORT CONTRACTORS COMPANY PRIVATE LTD,VIJYAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed,

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.69/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2014-15) Cmr Transport Contractors Company Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of Private Limited Income Tax D.No.54-18/3-4, Sivapuram Colony Circle-2(1) Near Iti Gate Vijayawada Vijayawada [Pan : Aaccc6075E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 40A(2) of the income tax act, 1961, as the third party cases are incomparable with directors cases, since a. Directors vehicles were admittedly under exclusive hire to the assessee with its attendant substantial business advantages to the assessee’s business. b. Directors gave substantial credit on payment of hire charges to the assessee company without charging any interest

RANAR AGROCHEM LIMITED,PARAWADA vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Manjunatha G. & Shri Ravish Soodआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.288/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2014-15) Ranar Agrochem Limited, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Visakhapatnam. Of Income Tax, Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaccp0372M (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri M. Madhusudan, Ca (Hybrid) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Sri Jenardhanan V, Cit-Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 14/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 31/10/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, J.M: The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Company Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income-Tax (Appeals), National Faceless Appeal Center (Nfac), Delhi, Dated 15/05/2024, Which In Turn Arises From The Order Passed By The Assessing Officer (For Short, “A.O.”) Under Section 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (For Short “The Act”) Dated 30/12/2016 For A.Y.

depreciation of Rs.6,63,63,807/-against the addition under Sec.68 r.w.s. 115BBE(2) of the Act may be allowed in the interest of equity the assessed income of Rs.3,47,97,000/- which also included and justice and also to be in conformity with enacted law and also judge made law. 6. In the facts and circumstances

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. PRATHYUSHA GLOBAL TRADE PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue is partly allowed and the petition filed by assessee under Rule 27 of the ITAT Rules is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

40A(3) of Rs. 48,984/-; (iii) Disallowance of electricity charges Rs.3,52,753/-; (iv) Disallowance of additional depreciation Rs.2,87,92,897/-; (v) Disallowance U/s. 14A Rs. 1,25,000/-. Aggrieved by the above order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A). The Ld.CIT(A) allowed the appeal of the assessee

ACIT, CIRCLE-2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VIZAG SEAPORT PVT. LTD., VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon‟Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon‟Ble(Through Hybrid Hearing) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 383/Viz/2017 (धनधाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2012-13) The Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Vizag Seaport Pvt Ltd., Income Tax, Administrative Block, Circle-5(1), S4 Gallery, Port Area, Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam – 530035. (अपीलाथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) [Pan :Aabcv2484K] अपीलाथी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Fenil A Bhatt, Ar प्रत्याथी की ओर से/ Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr सुनिाई की तारीख/ Date Of Hearing : 15/02/2024 घोर्णा की तारीख/Date Of : /04/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R Pers. Balakrishnan:

depreciation of project berth 12,31,27,277 2. Disallowance of operation and maintenance 3,69,00,000 services expenditure 3. Disallowance of interest U/s. 36(1)(iii) of the Act 14,41,000 4. Provision for doubtful debts 23,82,970 4. Disallowance of pay leaves and sick leaves