BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “depreciation”+ Section 32(1)(iia)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai251Delhi182Chennai147Kolkata121Ahmedabad69Bangalore56Chandigarh43Raipur34Hyderabad18Pune18Cochin14Indore14Cuttack12Nagpur10Jodhpur9Guwahati8Rajkot8Jaipur7Calcutta5Karnataka4Surat4Kerala3SC3Telangana2Lucknow2Amritsar2Visakhapatnam2Orissa1Panaji1

Key Topics

Section 143(1)4Section 14A3Section 143(3)2Depreciation2Disallowance2

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU vs. THE ANDHRA SUGARS LIMITED, TANUKU

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 380/VIZ/2019[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Jun 2025AY 2012-13

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 380/Viz/2019 (धनिाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2012-13) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Andhra Sugars Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-1, Tanuku. Eluru. Pan: Aaact6357Q (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) सी.ओ सं. / C.O. No. 140/Viz/2019 [आयक अपील सं. से उत्पन्न / Arising Out Of I.T.A. No. 380/Viz/2019(A.Y. 2012-13)] M/S. Andhra Sugars Ltd., Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Tanuku. Income Tax, Circle-1, Pan: Aaact6357Q Eluru. अपीलार्थीकीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca प्रत्यार्थीकीओरसे/ Revenue By : Dr.Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr

For Appellant: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, CAFor Respondent: Dr.Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 14ASection 80I

depreciation. He therefore pleaded that the order of the Ld. AO be upheld. 10. Per contra, the Ld. AR submitted that the generation of electricity is akin to manufacture of a product and is considered as a good under the Sale of Goods Act, 1930. He further submitted that as per section 32(1)(iia

SRI SATYA SAI EDUCATIONAL AND SERVICE SOCIETY,SRIKAKULAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

ITA 5/VIZ/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Aug 2022AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasadarao, Sr AR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 2(24)(iia)

iia) of the Act. Accordingly, we set-aside the order of the Ld. CIT(A) on Grounds no.3 and 4 raised by the assessee and these grounds raised by the assessee are allowed. 7. With respect to Ground No.5, the Ld. CIT(A) has disallowed the depreciation and bank charges aggregating to Rs. 3,82,340/- 6 on the basis