THE VISAKHAPATNAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE -1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee and Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

3. Without prejudice to the above, the Assessing Officer ought to have granted depreciation in as much as the „excess of liabilities over assets taken over‟ is the price paid for acquisition of a commercial/business right which is eligible for depreciation u/s. 32(i)(ii) of the Income Tax Act, 1961. C.O.No.130 & 131/VIZ/2018 (M/s. The Visakhapatnam Co-op. Bank

THE VISAKHAPATNAM CO-OPERATIVE BANK LTD,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blem/S. The Visakhapatnam Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Circle-1(1), Vs. M/S. The Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam. Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No. 58/Viz/2017 (Ita No. 308/Viz/2017) (Asst. Year : 2013-14) M/S. The Visakhapatnam Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent)

3)(v) would prevail. 5.3 In view of the clarification given in the circular the view taken in the appellate order dtd.22.10.2013 suffers from mistake and, as such a view was taken without consideration of the above referred CBDT circular clarifying the position of law, it would amount to mistake apparent from record and rectifiable u/s.154

THE ASST. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE VISAKHAPATNAM CO -OPERATIVE BANK LIMITD,, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blem/S. The Visakhapatnam Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Circle-1(1), Vs. M/S. The Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam. Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No. 58/Viz/2017 (Ita No. 308/Viz/2017) (Asst. Year : 2013-14) M/S. The Visakhapatnam Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent)

3)(v) would prevail. 5.3 In view of the clarification given in the circular the view taken in the appellate order dtd.22.10.2013 suffers from mistake and, as such a view was taken without consideration of the above referred CBDT circular clarifying the position of law, it would amount to mistake apparent from record and rectifiable u/s.154

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), VIJAYAWADA vs. KANDULA LAKSHUMMA MEMORIAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, KADAPA

In the result, appeal of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.179/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Smt.Kandula Income Tax (Exemptions) Lakshumma Memorial Vijayawada Educational Society D.No.3/429 Raja Reddy Street Kadapa [Pan :Aadas4432Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.91/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.179/Viz/2018) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2013-14) Vs. M/S Smt.Kandula Lakshumma Deputy Commissioner Of Memorial Educational Society Income Tax (Exemptions) D.No.3/429 Vijayawada Raja Reddy Street Kadapa [Pan :Aadas4432Q] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Shri B.Rama Krishna, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओ रसे / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 18.08.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21.09.2020

section 13(1)(c) of the Act, hence, requested the AO not to deny exemption u/s 11 of the Act. The AO considered the explanation of the assessee, but not convinced, since, the said amount was not recorded in the books of accounts of the assessee and the assessee has not furnished any evidence except the receipt / vouchers from

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, GUNTUR vs. LAKSHMI CONSTRUCTIONS, , GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and the C

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blethe Acit, Circle-2(1), Vs. M/S. Lakshmi Constructions, Guntur. D.No. 5-87-22, Sri Balaji House, Lakshmipuram, Guntur. Pan No. Aabfl 6560 B (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O. No. 47/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 10/Viz/2019) (Asst. Year : 2006-07) M/S. Lakshmi Constructions, Vs. The Acit, Circle-2(1), D.No. 5-87-22, Sri Balaji Guntur. House, Lakshmipuram, Guntur. Pan No. Aabfl 6560 B (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate. Department By : Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 29/04/2019. Date Of Pronouncement : 03/05/2019. O R D E R Per V. Durga Raothis Appeal By The Revenue & The Cross Objection By The Assessee Are Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-1, Guntur, Dated 29/09/2018 For The Assessment Year 2006-07. 2 Ita No.10 /Viz/2019 & C.O.No. 47/Viz/2019 (M/S. Lakshmi Constrcutions)

depreciation. An amount of Rs. 5,09,752/- received by the assessee firm as 3 ITA No.10 /VIZ/2019 & C.O.No. 47/VIZ/2019 (M/s. Lakshmi Constrcutions) discussed above was not considered as income for assessing the income at Rs. 12,34,384/-.” Accordingly, the Assessing Officer has added an amount of Rs. 5,09,752/- and assessment was completed under section 143(3

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE MAHARAJA CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purpose and the cross objections of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.211 & 212 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Asst.Years :2012-13 & 2013-14) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. The Maharaja Co-Operative Income Tax, Urban Bank Ltd. Central Circle-1 49-9-14, Ganta Arcade Visakhapatnam Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaat4196K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection Nos. 32 & 33/Viz/2018 Arising Out Of I.T.A.Nos.211 & 212 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Asst. Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14) The Maharaja Co-Operative Urban Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bank Ltd. Income Tax, 49-9-14, Ganta Arcade Central Circle-1 Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaat4196K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.08.2018

section 194A(3)(v) would prevail. 5.3 . In view of the clarification given in the circular the view taken in the appellate order dtd.22.10.2013 suffers from mistake and, as such a view was taken without consideration of the above referred CBDT circular clarifying the position of law, it would amount to mistake apparent from record and rectifiable u/s.154

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE MAHARAJA CO-OPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeals of the revenue are partly allowed for statistical purpose and the cross objections of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.211 & 212 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Asst.Years :2012-13 & 2013-14) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. The Maharaja Co-Operative Income Tax, Urban Bank Ltd. Central Circle-1 49-9-14, Ganta Arcade Visakhapatnam Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaat4196K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection Nos. 32 & 33/Viz/2018 Arising Out Of I.T.A.Nos.211 & 212 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/Asst. Years : 2012-13 & 2013-14) The Maharaja Co-Operative Urban Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Bank Ltd. Income Tax, 49-9-14, Ganta Arcade Central Circle-1 Dwarakanagar Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam [Pan : Aaaat4196K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Shri Deba Kumar Sonowal, Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08.08.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.08.2018

section 194A(3)(v) would prevail. 5.3 . In view of the clarification given in the circular the view taken in the appellate order dtd.22.10.2013 suffers from mistake and, as such a view was taken without consideration of the above referred CBDT circular clarifying the position of law, it would amount to mistake apparent from record and rectifiable u/s.154

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

depreciation to 10% as against 15% claimed by the appellant in respect of capital dredging & railway permanent way of Rs. 3,47,33,083/-. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in quantifying the relief in respect of prior period expenses as Rs. 31,62,336/- as against the correct amount of Rs. 34,97,097/-. 5. Any other ground that

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

depreciation to 10% as against 15% claimed by the appellant in respect of capital dredging & railway permanent way of Rs. 3,47,33,083/-. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in quantifying the relief in respect of prior period expenses as Rs. 31,62,336/- as against the correct amount of Rs. 34,97,097/-. 5. Any other ground that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. M/S. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

depreciation to 10% as against 15% claimed by the appellant in respect of capital dredging & railway permanent way of Rs. 3,47,33,083/-. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in quantifying the relief in respect of prior period expenses as Rs. 31,62,336/- as against the correct amount of Rs. 34,97,097/-. 5. Any other ground that

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

depreciation to 10% as against 15% claimed by the appellant in respect of capital dredging & railway permanent way of Rs. 3,47,33,083/-. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in quantifying the relief in respect of prior period expenses as Rs. 31,62,336/- as against the correct amount of Rs. 34,97,097/-. 5. Any other ground that

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

depreciation to 10% as against 15% claimed by the appellant in respect of capital dredging & railway permanent way of Rs. 3,47,33,083/-. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in quantifying the relief in respect of prior period expenses as Rs. 31,62,336/- as against the correct amount of Rs. 34,97,097/-. 5. Any other ground that

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.191/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year :2009-10) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.193/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Circle-1(1), Andhra Pradesh-530001. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.200/Viz/2023 (निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year : 2013-14) Deputy Commissioner Of Income Vs. Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Tax, Circle-1, Range-1, Administrative Office Building, Visakhapatnam. Port Area, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh-530001. Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

depreciation to 10% as against 15% claimed by the appellant in respect of capital dredging & railway permanent way of Rs. 3,47,33,083/-. 4. The Ld. CIT(A) erred in quantifying the relief in respect of prior period expenses as Rs. 31,62,336/- as against the correct amount of Rs. 34,97,097/-. 5. Any other ground that

ACIT., CIRCLE - 1(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S SRI BHASKAR CONTRACTORS COMPANY,,

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.109/Viz/2013 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Sri Bhaskar Contractors Income Tax Company Circle-3(1) D.No.60-3-27, F.No.101 Vijayawada Sai Aniketh Apartment Iti Bus Stop, Ashok Nagar Vijayawada [Pan : Aaqfs5687P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.70/Viz/2013 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.109/Viz/2013) M/S Sri Bhaskar Contractors Asst.Commissioner Of Company Income Tax D.No.60-3-27, F.No.101 Circle-1(1) Sai Aniketh Apartment Vijayawada Iti Bus Stop, Ashok Nagar Vijayawada [Pan : Aaqfs5687P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

13 I.T.A. No.109/Viz/2013, CO No.70/Viz/2013, A.Y. 2008-09 and I.T.A. No.432/Viz/2017, A.Y.2012-13 M/s Sri Bhaskar Contractors Company, Vijayawada year having accepted the same in the earlier years Thus, there is a merit in the submissions of the appellant that the AO was not justified in invoking the provisions of section 40A (3) in the peculiar facts and circumstances

ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. SRI BHASKAR CONTRACTORS COMPANY,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.109/Viz/2013 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Sri Bhaskar Contractors Income Tax Company Circle-3(1) D.No.60-3-27, F.No.101 Vijayawada Sai Aniketh Apartment Iti Bus Stop, Ashok Nagar Vijayawada [Pan : Aaqfs5687P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.70/Viz/2013 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.109/Viz/2013) M/S Sri Bhaskar Contractors Asst.Commissioner Of Company Income Tax D.No.60-3-27, F.No.101 Circle-1(1) Sai Aniketh Apartment Vijayawada Iti Bus Stop, Ashok Nagar Vijayawada [Pan : Aaqfs5687P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

13 I.T.A. No.109/Viz/2013, CO No.70/Viz/2013, A.Y. 2008-09 and I.T.A. No.432/Viz/2017, A.Y.2012-13 M/s Sri Bhaskar Contractors Company, Vijayawada year having accepted the same in the earlier years Thus, there is a merit in the submissions of the appellant that the AO was not justified in invoking the provisions of section 40A (3) in the peculiar facts and circumstances

M/S. SUBHAM MAHESWARI COLD STORAGE (P)LTD,,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT,, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blem/S. Subham Maheswari Cold Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Storage Pvt. Ltd., D.No. 25- Guntur. 16-135, Madras Road, Guntur. Pan No. Aajps 3724 N (Appellant) (Respondent)

depreciation has been considered by the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for Assessment Years 2004-05 & 2005-06 in ITA 238/VIZ/2008 & 347/VIZ/2009 by order dated 20/10/2010. 7. On the other hand, ld. counsel for the assessee fairly accepted that the present issue is decided against the assessee. 8. We have heard both the sides, perused

THE ACIT,, GUNTUR vs. SAI BHASKAR IRONS LIMITED,, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अऩीऱ सं./I.T.A.No.108/Viz/2016 (ननधधारण वषा/Assessment Year:2012-13) Asst.Commissioner Of Income Tax Vs. M/S.Sai Bhaskar Circle-2(1), Guntur Irons Limited 3-1-3/A, 3Rd Lane Rajendra Nagar Guntur [Pan :Aamcs1675G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Deba K.Sonowala, Dr प्रत्यथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri I Kama Sastry, Ar सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 09.02.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 21.02.2018

Section 71 permits the assessee to set off losses other than capital gains against the income from other heads. Since the unabsorbed depreciation par takes the character of current year’s depreciation in the following year, we hold that the CIT(A) has rightly allowed the set off of unabsorbed depreciation and we do not find any infirmity

DCIT, CENTRAL CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA vs. ATREYAPURAM SWARNA LAKSHMI,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed

Bench: Shri B.R. Baskaran & Shri Duvvuru R.L. Reddyआयकर अऩीऱ सं./I.T.A.Nos.557&558/Vizag/2017 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Years: 2006-07 & 2007-08) Dcit, Central Circle Smt. Atreyapurapu Vijayawada Swarnalakshmi Visakhapatnam [Pan No.Adbpa3951Tg] (अपीऱार्थी / Appellant) (प्रत्यार्थी / Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से / Appellant By : Shri R.S. Aravindakshan, Dr प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri I. Kamasastry, Ar सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.03.2018 घोषणध की तधरीख / Date Of Pronouncement : 22.03.2018 आदेश / O R D E R Per Shri Duvvur R.L. Reddy:

depreciation @15% towards disallowance of claim made under the head repairs etc. treating the same as capital expenditure. The Assessing Officer also disallowed an amount of Rs.41,554/- towards self-assessment tax payments by rejecting the plea of the assessee that the same may not be disallowed in consequence to the order under section 263 of the Act. 6. Being