ANDHRA PRADESH POWER GENERATION CORPORATION LIMITED,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE-3(1), , VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.K.Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.167/Viz/2020 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2012-13) Andhra Pradesh Power Generation Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Corporation Ltd. Income Tax Vijayawada Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aacca2734J] Vijayawada (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

u/s 263 for excess claim of Depreciation. The Ld.Pr.CIT issued show cause notice, stating that the assessee has claimed depreciation @100% on Chimney against the allowable depreciation of @15% and thus, the assessment resulted in excess allowance of depreciation of Rs.53,25,74,114/-, hence, directed the assessee as to why the assessment should not be revised

M/S ABC ENGINEERING WORKS,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE DCIT,, VIJAYAWADA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Vs. M/S Abc Engineering Works Vijayawada Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.79/Viz/2013 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 210/Viz/2015 & 75/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2010-11 & 2012-13) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar , Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] Dy.Cit, Circle-1(1) Vijayawada (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant)

depreciation in para No.5 of the assessment order. Subsequently, the ld.CIT has taken up the case for revision u/s 263

THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. ABC ENGINEERING WORKERS,, VIJAYAWADA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Vs. M/S Abc Engineering Works Vijayawada Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.79/Viz/2013 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 210/Viz/2015 & 75/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2010-11 & 2012-13) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar , Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] Dy.Cit, Circle-1(1) Vijayawada (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant)

depreciation in para No.5 of the assessment order. Subsequently, the ld.CIT has taken up the case for revision u/s 263

THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. ABC ENGINEERING WORKS,, VIJAYAWADA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Vs. M/S Abc Engineering Works Vijayawada Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.79/Viz/2013 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 210/Viz/2015 & 75/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2010-11 & 2012-13) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar , Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] Dy.Cit, Circle-1(1) Vijayawada (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant)

depreciation in para No.5 of the assessment order. Subsequently, the ld.CIT has taken up the case for revision u/s 263

THE ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. ABC ENGINEERING WORKS,, VIJAYAWADA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Vs. M/S Abc Engineering Works Vijayawada Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.79/Viz/2013 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 210/Viz/2015 & 75/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2010-11 & 2012-13) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar , Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] Dy.Cit, Circle-1(1) Vijayawada (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant)

depreciation in para No.5 of the assessment order. Subsequently, the ld.CIT has taken up the case for revision u/s 263

M/S. ABC ENGINEERING WORKS,,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE DY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Vs. M/S Abc Engineering Works Vijayawada Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.79/Viz/2013 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.112/Viz/2013) (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2008-09) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar, Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No. 210/Viz/2015 & 75/Viz/2017 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2010-11 & 2012-13) M/S Abc Engineering Works Vs. Dy.Cit, Circle-2(1) Plot No.24, 2Nd Road Vijayawada Autonagar , Vijayawada [Pan : Aaffa7383K] Dy.Cit, Circle-1(1) Vijayawada (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant)

depreciation in para No.5 of the assessment order. Subsequently, the ld.CIT has taken up the case for revision u/s 263

NALLAMILLI SATYANARAYANA REDDY & OTHERS vs. THE DY. CIT,, KAKINADA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter called as 'the Act'). In this case, the assessment order was completed u/s 143(3) of the Act by an order dated 31.12.2013 on total income of ` 13,30,125/- against the returned income of ` 9,23,003/-. Later on, the Ld. Principal Commissioner of Income Tax has taken up the case

THE KCP LTD.,,CHENNAI vs. THE DCIT,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

revision of the assessment u/s 263 of the Act for not examining the rental receipts understated by the assessee compared to the TDS receipts as per Form No.26AS and the excess depreciation

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

revision proceedings u/s 263 of I.T. Act. According to the Ld.CIT, the department has computed the net profit on the basis of the evidences found during the survey proceedings considering the total income and expenditure, hence, the AO should have adopted the same income. Since there was no indication of payment salaries to the partners and interest on partnership capital

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

revision proceedings u/s 263 of I.T. Act. According to the Ld.CIT, the department has computed the net profit on the basis of the evidences found during the survey proceedings considering the total income and expenditure, hence, the AO should have adopted the same income. Since there was no indication of payment salaries to the partners and interest on partnership capital

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

revision proceedings u/s 263 of I.T. Act. According to the Ld.CIT, the department has computed the net profit on the basis of the evidences found during the survey proceedings considering the total income and expenditure, hence, the AO should have adopted the same income. Since there was no indication of payment salaries to the partners and interest on partnership capital

SATYANARAYANA & OTHERS,RAVULAPALEM vs. THE ITO,, AMALAPURAM

In the result, appeals of the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.298-299/Viz/2012 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. Cit, Rajahmundry Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.505-508/Viz/2016 ("नधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2007-08 & 2008-09) Satyanarayana & Others Vs. The Ito, Ward-2 Ravulapalem, East Godavari Dist Amalapuram [Pan : Abjfs6323E] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

revision proceedings u/s 263 of I.T. Act. According to the Ld.CIT, the department has computed the net profit on the basis of the evidences found during the survey proceedings considering the total income and expenditure, hence, the AO should have adopted the same income. Since there was no indication of payment salaries to the partners and interest on partnership capital

GIRIJA MODERN RICE MILL ,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.142/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2015-16) M/S Girija Modern Rice Mill Vs. Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax D.No.159/1, Enikepadu Vijayawada Krishna (Dt.) Vijayawada [Pan : Aahfg4582E]

revision u/s 263, hence submitted that no interference is called for in the order of the Ld.Pr.CIT. 6. We have heard both the parties and perused the material placed on record. In this case, assessment was completed u/s 143(3) after receiving directions from Ld.Jt.CIT u/s 144A of the Act. Thus, the assessment was properly monitored by the Jt.CIT

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee (ITA No

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.192/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. The Asst. Commissioner Of Administrative Office Building, Income Tax, Port Area, Circle-1(1), Visakhapatnam, Visakhapatnam. Andhra Pradesh-530001, Pan: Aaalv 0035 C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri Gvn Hari, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr

depreciation short computed at Rs. 4,34,12,229/- in the assessment order passed U/s. 143(3) of the Act and reduced the demand payable to Rs. 37,62,20,940/-. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO passed U/s. 143(3), the assessee went on appeal before the Ld. CIT(A), Visakhapatnam. On appeal

THE DY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. R.R. CONSTRUCTIONS,, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, the appeal filed by the revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

revision u/s 263 of the Act and directed the A.O. to make the addition of ` 31,67,480/- relating to the depreciation

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ADDL. CIT.,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

263 of the Act in as much as the order of the Assessing Officer U/s. 143(3) of the Act is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. 3. The Ld. CIT is not justified in directing the Assessing Officer to consider for disallowance U/s

VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ACIT, CIRCLE - 1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

263 of the Act in as much as the order of the Assessing Officer U/s. 143(3) of the Act is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. 3. The Ld. CIT is not justified in directing the Assessing Officer to consider for disallowance U/s

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VISAKHAPATNAM PORT AUTHORITY,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, CO raised by the assessee is disposed off as discussed herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.25/Viz/2014 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2010-11) Visakhapatnam Port Authority, Vs. Addl. Cit, (Formerly Known As M/S. Range-1, Visakhapatnam Port Trust) Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaalv0035C (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent)

263 of the Act in as much as the order of the Assessing Officer U/s. 143(3) of the Act is neither erroneous nor prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. 3. The Ld. CIT is not justified in directing the Assessing Officer to consider for disallowance U/s