ADIMULAM HARIVARDHAN ,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE CIT(A)-12, , HYDERABAD
In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 529/VIZ/2018[2012-13]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2012-13
Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleadimulam Harivardhan, Vs. Ito, Ward-2(2), S/O Late A. Narayana Rao, Rajahmundry. Prop. M/S. Murali Krishna Enterprises, D.No. 29-33-6, Devi Chowk, Rajahmundry. Pan No. Atjpa 8637 M (Appellant) (Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.V.N. Hari – Advocate. Department By : Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.Dr Date Of Hearing : 16/04/2019. Date Of Pronouncement : 30/04/2019. O R D E R Per V. Durga Raothis Appeal By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals)-12, Hyderabad, Dated 18/07/2018 For The Assessment Year 2012-13. 2. There Is A Delay Of One Day In Filing This Appeal. The Assessee Has Filed An Affidavit. We Have Gone Through The Affidavit & Find That There Is A Sufficient Cause To Condone The Delay. Accordingly, Delay Is Condoned. 3. Facts Of The Case, In Brief, Are That The Assessee Is The Proprietor Of M/S. Sree Murali Krishna Enterprises, Engaged In (Adimulam Harivardhan)
For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR
Section 133ASection 143(3)Section 148
delay is condoned.
3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is the proprietor of M/s. Sree Murali Krishna Enterprises, engaged in (Adimulam Harivardhan)
retail trade of tiles and allied material. A survey under section 133A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') was conducted on 30/06/2011 at the business premises
