BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 292clear

Sorted by relevance

Kolkata113Karnataka112Chennai85Delhi70Mumbai69Chandigarh55Bangalore46Jaipur41Ahmedabad40Pune35Panaji32Hyderabad20Surat17Indore12Guwahati10Cochin10Lucknow9Rajkot7Cuttack6Nagpur5Telangana4Calcutta3Jodhpur3Andhra Pradesh3Raipur3Visakhapatnam2Allahabad2Rajasthan1Patna1SC1Orissa1Dehradun1Agra1

Key Topics

Section 1487Section 142(1)4Section 103Section 1442Section 1392

M.RAGHURAMA RAJU L/R OF (LATE) M RADHA MOHAN RAJU,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(2), , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 529/VIZ/2019[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Jun 2020AY 2007-08

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.529/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2007-08) M Raghurama Raju Vs Income Tax Officer L/R Of (Late) M.Radha Mohan Raju Ward-2(2) Flat No.306, Charan Castle Visakhapatnam Sairam Colony Madhurawada Visakhapatnam [Pan : Agxpm9324L] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri C.Subrahmanyam, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Smt U Mini Chandran, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 11.06.2020 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 17.06.2020 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri D.S.Sunder Singh: Delay: This Appeal Is Filed By The Legal Representative Of The Assessee Against The Order Of The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam In I.T.A.No.0111/2015-16/Ito,W-2(2),Vsp/2019-20 Dated 14.06.2019 For The Assessment Year (A.Y.)2007-08 With A Delay Of 3 Days.

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt U Mini Chandran, DR
Section 142(1)Section 144Section 148Section 50C

condone the delay and admit the appeal. 2. In the instant case, the assessee has filed as many as nine grounds, however pressed ground No.2 which is related to the validity of issue of notice u/s 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) on a dead person. Therefore, first we take up the legal ground which reads

DE PAUL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,ELURU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), , HYDERABAD

In the result, the appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

ITA 155/VIZ/2020[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Feb 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.155/Viz/2020 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) De Paul Educational Society Vs. Commissioner Of Income Tax Pinakadimi (Exemptions) Pinakadimi Post Hyderabad Pedavegi Mandal Eluru, West Godavari [Pan :Aaaad7299K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri Johney, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit(Dr) सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 31.01.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 16.02.2023

For Appellant: Shri Johney, ARFor Respondent: Shri MN Murthy Naik
Section 10Section 139Section 2(15)

condone the delay of 232 days and proceed to hear the case on merits. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is a society registered under Societies Registration Act XXI of 1860 with Reg. No.215/1994. The assessee is engaged in imparting education as covered u/s 2(15) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short