Search: condonation of delay

5 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 285clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)11 Section 80I9 Section 118 Section 1486 Section 801B(10)6 Section 139(1)5 Section 12A4 Section 143(1)3 Deduction

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS),, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTE, , PENUGONDA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue as well as cross objection filed by the assessee is dismissed

ITA 315/VIZ/2018[2003-2004]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Mar 2019AY 2003-2004

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleito (Exemptions), Vs. M/S. Agricultural Market Rajahmundry. Committee, Sidhantam Road Market Yard, Penugonda, West Godavari District Pan No. Aaala 0388 F (Appellant) (Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR

Section 11Section 12ASection 143(3)

delay is condoned. 3. Facts of the case, in brief, are that the assessee is a statutory body established under the Andhra Pradesh (Agricultural Produce and Live stocks) Markets Act, 1966. The ld.CIT, Rajahmundry granted registration u/s. 12AA to the assessee from 22.07.1997. For the Assessment Year 2003-04, assessee claimed exemption of its income under the provisions

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS),, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTE, , PENUGONDA

INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS),, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. AGRICULTURAL MARKET COMMITTE, , PENUGONDA

ABHILASH SYNERGETIC CONSTRUCTIONS & EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-5(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

ABHILASH SYNERGETIC CONSTRUCTIONS & EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(5),, VISAKHAPATNAM

ABHILASH SYNERGETIC CONSTRUCTIONS & EXPORTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), , VISAKHAPATNAM

SHREYA CANCER FOUNDATION,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE ITO, WARD-1(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM