BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 275(1)(a)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka102Chandigarh69Ahmedabad62Mumbai57Delhi54Jaipur54Chennai43Kolkata39Hyderabad33Bangalore32Surat25Cochin22Cuttack15Nagpur13Pune10Lucknow10Indore9Visakhapatnam6Panaji3Patna2Jodhpur1Andhra Pradesh1Calcutta1Jabalpur1Agra1Raipur1Rajasthan1Rajkot1Varanasi1

Key Topics

Section 1478Section 271A6Addition to Income5Section 143(1)4Section 114Section 1484Section 132(4)3Section 143(3)3Section 9(1)

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, GUNTUR vs. SILEMANKHAN & MAHABOOBKHAN, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the revenue as well as the cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 571/VIZ/2019[2016-2017]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Nov 2020AY 2016-2017

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.571/Viz/2019 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Year:2016-2017) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Silemankhan & Mahaboobkhan Income Tax D.No.15-11-16 Central Circle-2 Mangalagiri Road Guntur Guntur [Pan : Aaifs2791N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.149/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of I.T.A. No.571/Viz/2019) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year:2016-2017) M/S Silemankhan & Vs. Deputy.Commissioner Of Mahaboobkhan Income Tax D.No.15-11-16 Central Circle-2 Mangalagiri Road Guntur Guntur [Pan : Aaifs2791N] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri M.V.Prasad, CA, ARFor Respondent: Shri D.K.Sonowal, CIT, DR
Section 132Section 132(4)Section 143(3)Section 153CSection 271A

275 shall, as far as may be, apply in relation to the penalty referred to in this section. Explanation.--For the purposes of this section,-- (a) "specified date" means the due date of furnishing of return of income under sub-section (1) of section 139 or the date on which the period specified in the notice issued under section 153A

2
Exemption2
Bogus Purchases2
Reopening of Assessment2

BEJAVADA SUBBAYAMMA,CHAGALLU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, TANAKU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is not maintainable and dismissed in-limine

ITA 146/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Aug 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 146/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Bejavada Subbayamma V. Income Tax Officer – Ward – 2 Income Tax Office D.No. 15-48, Meenanagaram Aayakar Bhavan, Sajjapuram Chagallu Mandal– 534342 Tanuku – 534211 West Godavari District Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh

Section 144Section 69A

1) dated 09.05.2023 arising out I.T.A. No. 146/VIZ/2024 Bejavada Subbayamma of order passed Under section 144 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) dated 27.12.2019 for the A.Y. 2017-18. 2. Briefly stated facts of the case are that, the husband of the appellant; One B. Surya Rao, was allotted licence for liquor business for the Financial Year

YENUGUVANI LANKA RURAL EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,YENUGUVANI LANKA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, PALAKOL

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 265/VIZ/2021[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Apr 2022AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./ I.T.A. No.265/Viz/2021 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year :2018-19) Yenuguvani Lanka Rural Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ward-1, Educational Society, Income Tax Buildings, D.No.2-76, New Harijana Peta, Near Govt. College, Yenuguvani Lanka. Doddipatla Road, Palakol, Andhra Pradesh. Pan: Aaaay 2757 K (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri I. Kama Sastry प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Spg Mudaliar, Sr. Ar

For Appellant: Sri I. Kama SastryFor Respondent: Sri SPG Mudaliar, Sr. AR
Section 11Section 12ASection 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 164(2)Section 167BSection 167B(1)Section 288

delay cannot be condoned. The Ld. CIT(A) also quoted section 143(1)(a)(ii) that the adjustments by CPC were not beyond the scope of section 143(1). The Ld. CIT (A) therefore confirmed the intimation u/s. 143(1) of the Act issued by the CPC, Bangalore. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. CIT (A), the assessee

VADDADI MADHUSUDANA RAO,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is treated as allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 423/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Nov 2024AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan Sआ.अपी.सं / Ita No.423/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year: 2020-21)

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Aparna Villuri, DR
Section 143(2)Section 69Section 9(1)

275/- after deducting tax at source at Rs.14,35,169/- from the total benefits of Rs.1,22,50,444/-. Assessee filed return of income for assessment year 2020-21 on 25/11/2020 admitting income of Rs.52,31,590/- and claimed exemption of Rs.13,21,198/- in respect of gratuity. 3. The return of income filed by the assessee was taken

SMT. L SUDHA BALA, L/R OF LATE SRI L.NARSA REDDY,GUNTUR vs. THE DCIT, SPECIAL RANGE GUNTUR, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 260/VIZ/2012[1984-85]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Dec 2018AY 1984-85

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.260 & 261/Viz/2012 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years :1984-85 & 1985-86 Respectively) L.Sudha Bala Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of L/R Of Late Sri L Narasa Reddy Income Tax Prop.Sri Venkateswara Agro Chemicals Special Range Industries Guntur 2-14-101, Syamala Nagar 2Nd Lane, Guntur [Pan : Acgpl2351P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

delay is condoned. 2. The assessee filed appeal raising the following grounds along with Form No.36. (1) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Commissioner of Income Tax is not correct in law or on facts in upholding the reopening of the assessment u/s 148 of the Act though the reasons recorded for reopening of assessment

SMT. L SUDHA BALA, L/R OF LATE SRI L.NARSA REDDY,GUNTUR vs. THE DCIT, SPECIAL RANGE GUNTUR, GUNTUR

In the result, the appeals of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 261/VIZ/2012[1985-86]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Dec 2018AY 1985-86

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.260 & 261/Viz/2012 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years :1984-85 & 1985-86 Respectively) L.Sudha Bala Vs. Dy.Commissioner Of L/R Of Late Sri L Narasa Reddy Income Tax Prop.Sri Venkateswara Agro Chemicals Special Range Industries Guntur 2-14-101, Syamala Nagar 2Nd Lane, Guntur [Pan : Acgpl2351P] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik, DR
Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 40A(3)

delay is condoned. 2. The assessee filed appeal raising the following grounds along with Form No.36. (1) On the facts and circumstances of the case, the Hon’ble Commissioner of Income Tax is not correct in law or on facts in upholding the reopening of the assessment u/s 148 of the Act though the reasons recorded for reopening of assessment