Search: condonation of delay

6 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Fclear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai32 Jaipur32 Ahmedabad28 Delhi23 Surat20 Pune18 Lucknow18 Bangalore14 Indore13 Amritsar9 Nagpur7 Hyderabad7 Chennai7 Visakhapatnam6 Chandigarh6 Patna5 Kolkata4 Jabalpur3 Allahabad3 Rajkot2 SC1 Agra1 Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 234E12 Section 142(1)11 Section 1447 Penalty5 Condonation of Delay5 Section 69A4 Section 2503 Section 200A3 Section 154

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 236/VIZ/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao

Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 246Section 250

condone the delay of 16 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits. 4. Since the grounds raised by the assessee in all the three appeals are identical, we shall take up the ITA No. 236/Viz/2022 (AY 2013-14) as the lead appeal. 5. Brief facts of the case pertaining

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE MUNDLAPADU PRIMARY AGRICULTURAL COOPERATIVE CREDIT SOCIETY LIMITED,MUNDLAPADU VILLAGE vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(3), VIJAYAWADA

BAPATLA MAHILA MUTUALLY AIDED CO-OP THRIFT SOCIET LIMITED,BAPATLA vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, WRD-1, BAPATLA

PURAMA RAMAKRISHNA RAO,SALURU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, VIZIANAGARAM