Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 271Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Raipur38 Delhi28 Cochin26 Jaipur22 Karnataka21 Ahmedabad15 Nagpur9 Bangalore6 Chandigarh5 Mumbai5 Visakhapatnam4 Chennai3 Kolkata2 Surat2 Lucknow2 Guwahati1 Panaji1 SC1

Key Topics

Section 234E12 Penalty4 TDS4 Section 2503 Section 200A3 Section 1543 Section 2463 Section 271C3 Condonation of Delay3

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 237/VIZ/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao

Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 246Section 250

condone the delay of 16 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits. 4. Since the grounds raised by the assessee in all the three appeals are identical, we shall take up the ITA No. 236/Viz/2022 (AY 2013-14) as the lead appeal. 5. Brief facts of the case pertaining

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ITO (TDS), RAJAHMUNDRY vs. M/S. OM SAI RAM, ENTERPRISES,, MANDAPETA