RUTH MAMIDI,WEST GODAVARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TADEPALLIGUDEM
In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed
ITA 3/VIZ/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Jul 2023AY 2017-18
Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.03/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Mrs. Ruth Mamidi, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 3-45 Ananthapalli, Ward-1, Ramalayam Veedhi, Nallajerla Tadepalligudem, Mandal, West Godavari, Andhra Pradesh-534101. Andhra Pradesh – 534111. Pan: Cxmpm 2888 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant By : Sri C. Subrahmanyam, Ar ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाईक"तार"ख/ Date Of Hearing : 21/06/2023 घोषणाक"तार"ख/Date Of : 17/07/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R
For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 139Section 142(1)Section 144Section 271(1)(c)
271(1)(c) of the Act which she was contemplating to file could not be filed. Thereupon, assessee approached the Counsel on 27/12/2022 who said he shall do the needful within a week’s time accordingly, the appeal was filed on 4/01/2023 as against the due date i.e., 289/07/2022 causing a delay of 206 days.
5. But for the reasons