Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 248clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271(1)(c)9 Penalty4 Addition to Income4 Section 143(3)3 Section 2742 Section 352

GADDE KISHNA,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeals filed by the assessees are allowed

ITA 367/VIZ/2019[2006-07]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam08 Nov 2019AY 2006-07

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N. Hari – AdvocateFor Respondent: Smt. Suman Malik – Sr.DR

Section 143(3)Section 271(1)(c)Section 274

delay is condoned. (Gadde Kishan & Another) For the sake of convenience, facts are taken from ITA No. 4. 367/VIZ/2019. The assessee is an individual, filed his return of income by declaring total income of Rs.55,300/-. The case of the assessee was selected for scrutiny and assessment was completed under section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter

GADDE KISHNA,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, VIJAYAWADA

GADDE HARI PRASADA RAO,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, VIJAYAWADA

GADDE KISHNA,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, VIJAYAWADA

GADDE HARI PRASADA RAO,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3),, VIJAYAWADA

SRI SURYA ANJANEYA INDUSTRIES,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, VIZIANAGARAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ARYAPURAM COOPERATIVE URBAN BANK LIMITED, RAJAHMUNDRY