RAVI PRASAD BOYAPATI,KRISHNA DISTRICT vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(3), VIJAYAWADA
In the result, both the captioned appeals are allowed for statistical purposes
ITA 54/VIZ/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam15 Apr 2025AY 2015-16
Bench: Us:
For Appellant: Shri C. Subrahmanyam, CA
Section 147Section 148Section 148ASection 250Section 250(6)Section 69A
Section 147 r.w.s. 144 r.w.s. 144B of the Act, dated
01.02.2024, determined the income of the assessee at Rs.39,17,731/-.
5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A) but without success. As discernible from the record, the CIT(A), having taken cognizance of the fact that the assessee despite having been put to notice