BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 246(1)(q)clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka100Delhi15Lucknow9Mumbai8Visakhapatnam7Jaipur6Ahmedabad6Kolkata5Telangana2Orissa1Varanasi1Andhra Pradesh1Cuttack1Cochin1Guwahati1

Key Topics

Section 234E12Section 271F12Section 246(1)(q)12Penalty7Section 2503Section 200A3Section 1543Section 2463TDS3

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 237/VIZ/2022[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Apr 2023AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 246Section 250

condone the delay of 16 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits. 4. Since the grounds raised by the assessee in all the three appeals are identical, we shall take up the ITA No. 236/Viz/2022 (AY 2013-14) as the lead appeal. 5. Brief facts of the case pertaining

Condonation of Delay3
Rectification u/s 1543

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 236/VIZ/2022[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Apr 2023AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 246Section 250

condone the delay of 16 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits. 4. Since the grounds raised by the assessee in all the three appeals are identical, we shall take up the ITA No. 236/Viz/2022 (AY 2013-14) as the lead appeal. 5. Brief facts of the case pertaining

BALAJEE CONSTRUCTIONS,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS WARD-1, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee in ITA

ITA 238/VIZ/2022[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Apr 2023AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 154Section 200ASection 234ESection 246Section 250

condone the delay of 16 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits. 4. Since the grounds raised by the assessee in all the three appeals are identical, we shall take up the ITA No. 236/Viz/2022 (AY 2013-14) as the lead appeal. 5. Brief facts of the case pertaining

KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty

ITA 387/VIZ/2017[2013-2014]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Aug 2018AY 2013-2014

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao – AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri K.C. Das –Sr.DR
Section 246(1)(q)Section 271F

246(1)(q), against 3 ITA No.385-389/NAG/2017 (CEO, The Kanaka Mahalakshmi Co-op Bank Ltd.) penalty order passed under section 271FA of the Act, appeal is maintainable before the ld. CIT(A), therefore, we permit the assessee to withdraw these appeals and it is open to the assessee to file the appeals before the ld. CIT(A). However, we observe

KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI CO-OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX( INTELLIGANCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION),, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty

ITA 385/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Aug 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao – AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri K.C. Das –Sr.DR
Section 246(1)(q)Section 271F

246(1)(q), against 3 ITA No.385-389/NAG/2017 (CEO, The Kanaka Mahalakshmi Co-op Bank Ltd.) penalty order passed under section 271FA of the Act, appeal is maintainable before the ld. CIT(A), therefore, we permit the assessee to withdraw these appeals and it is open to the assessee to file the appeals before the ld. CIT(A). However, we observe

KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI CO- OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX( INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty

ITA 386/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Aug 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao – AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri K.C. Das –Sr.DR
Section 246(1)(q)Section 271F

246(1)(q), against 3 ITA No.385-389/NAG/2017 (CEO, The Kanaka Mahalakshmi Co-op Bank Ltd.) penalty order passed under section 271FA of the Act, appeal is maintainable before the ld. CIT(A), therefore, we permit the assessee to withdraw these appeals and it is open to the assessee to file the appeals before the ld. CIT(A). However, we observe

KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI CO- OPERATIVE BANK LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DIRECTOR OF INCOME TAX (INTELLIGENCE & CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION),, HYDERABAD

In the result, appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty

ITA 388/VIZ/2017[2014-2015]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam21 Aug 2018AY 2014-2015

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Shri S. Rama Rao – AdvocateFor Respondent: Shri K.C. Das –Sr.DR
Section 246(1)(q)Section 271F

246(1)(q), against 3 ITA No.385-389/NAG/2017 (CEO, The Kanaka Mahalakshmi Co-op Bank Ltd.) penalty order passed under section 271FA of the Act, appeal is maintainable before the ld. CIT(A), therefore, we permit the assessee to withdraw these appeals and it is open to the assessee to file the appeals before the ld. CIT(A). However, we observe