Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 245clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 271D5 Condonation of Delay3 Section 269S2 Section 1322 Section 153A2 Section 143(2)2 Section 142(1)2 Limitation/Time-bar2

NYMISH KUNDUM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

ITA 210/VIZ/2022[2016-7]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 May 2024

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri GVN Hari, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR

Section 143(3)Section 269SSection 271D

condone the delay of 53 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits in the following paragraphs. 3 4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee, an individual, filed her return of income on 18/11/2016 for the AY 2016-17 declaring total income

NYMISH KUNDUM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. PHOZO DIGITAL PRESS PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

NYMISH KUNDUM,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), RAJAMAHENDRAVARAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. PHOZO DIGITAL PRESS PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. PHOZO DIGITAL PRESS PRIVATE LIMITED, VISAKHAPATNAM