Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 234Cclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 69A3 Section 2502 Section 11(2)2

SRIPADA SRIVALLABHA MAHA SAMSTANAM,PITHAPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION WARD), RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 289/VIZ/2023[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam27 Nov 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri Balakrishnan, S & आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.289/Viz/2023 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2017-18) Sripada Srivallabha Vs. Income Tax Officer Mahasamsthanam Exemption Ward Pithapuram Rajahmundry Pan:Aadts8424P (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri Vvs Narayana Medisetti राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 27/11/2024 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 27/11/2024 आदेश/Order

For Appellant: Shri VVS Narayana MedisettiFor Respondent: : Dr. Aparna Villuri, DR

Section 11(2)Section 143(3)

delay of 31 days in filing the appeal is hereby condoned and the appeal is admitted for adjudication. 5. The assessee has raised the following grounds: “1. Impugned order dated 24-12-2019 under section 143(3) of 1.T. Act determining total income at Rs 1,46,25,654/- and raising a demand

SRIPADA SRIVALLABHA MAHA SAMSTANAM,PITHAPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION WARD), RAJAHMUNDRY

SRIPADA SRIVALLABHA MAHA SAMSTANAM,PITHAPURAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION WARD), RAJAHMUNDRY

VENKATA NARASIMHAM THOTA,KIRLAMPUDI MANDAL vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, KAKINADA