Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 207clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 80P8 Section 139(1)8 Section 143(1)5 Deduction3 Disallowance3 Section 143(2)2 Section 9(1)2 Section 36(1)(va)2 Exemption

ANGADALA RAMAKRISHNA,VELERU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GUDIVADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

ITA 242/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Oct 2024AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.242/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ramakrishna Angadala, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 7-121/B, Veeravalli, Bapulapadu, Ward-1, Krishna District-521110, Gudivada. Andhra Pradesh. Pan: Brwpa7639F (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri C. Subrahmanyam, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 08/10/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 23/10/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

For Appellant: Sri C. Subrahmanyam, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR

Section 142(1)Section 144

condone the delay of 207 days in filing the appeal of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits. 4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual. For the AY 2017-18, the assessee did not file his return of income. As per the information available with

ANGADALA RAMAKRISHNA,VELERU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GUDIVADA

ANGADALA RAMAKRISHNA,VELERU vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, GUDIVADA

SAGARA VIKASA MUTUALLY AIDED COOP THRIFT SOCIETY LTD ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

THE ETIKOPPAKA COOP AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

VADDADI MADHUSUDANA RAO,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM