Search: condonation of delay

2 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 206clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 142(1)5 Section 1443 Section 1392 Cash Deposit2 Demonetization2 Condonation of Delay2

CHAITANYA LEARNING ZONE PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(5), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

ITA 182/VIZ/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Aug 2022AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअऩीऱसं./ I.T.A. No.182/Viz/2021 (ननधधारणवषा/ Assessment Year :2017-18) M/S. Chaitanya Learning Zone Vs. Income Tax Officer, Pvt Ltd., Ward-1(5), Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aaecc 6869 J (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथीकीओरसे/ Appellant By : Sri Ss Sarat Chandra, Advocate प्रत्यधथीकीओरसे/ Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasadarao, Sr. Ar

For Appellant: Sri SS Sarat Chandra, AdvocateFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasadarao, Sr. AR

Section 115BSection 142(1)Section 144Section 234ASection 234BSection 69A

section 115BBE of the Act. Aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT(A) with a delay of 206 days. Before the Ld. CIT (A), the assessee filed submissions seeking condonation

CHAITANYA LEARNING ZONE PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(5), VISAKHAPATNAM

CHAITANYA LEARNING ZONE PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1(5), VISAKHAPATNAM

RUTH MAMIDI,WEST GODAVARI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TADEPALLIGUDEM