THE CHINAOGIRALA PACS LTD,CHINAOGIRALA VILLAGE vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 1, GUDIVADA, GUDIVADA

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.296/Viz/2023 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2020-21) The Chinaogirala Pacs Ltd, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Chinaogirala Village, Ward-1, Vuyyuru Mandal, Gudivada, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh-521301. Andha Pradesh-521245. Pan: Aacat 8188 M (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : None प्रत्यधर्थी की ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar

47,82,069/- is interest on investments and the balance of Rs. 37,89,351/- is interest earned on loans and advances given to its members. The assessee has also furnished the calculation of 4 deduction U/s. 80P of the Act. The Ld. AO did not consider the submissions made by the assessee and denied the assessee’s claim

MANNE KRISHNA KISHORE,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is dismissed in-limine

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

47,25,653/-); (ii) addition of Rs. 4,59,250/- being undisclosed investment towards purchase of three plots at Yandada and Rajahmundry and the payment of stamp duty. Thus, the Ld. AO completed the assessment U/s. 143(3) of the Act and assessed the total income at Rs. 56,13,250/-. Aggrieved by the order

KAKATIYA SANGHAM,TANUKU vs. INCPME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, TANUKU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.19/Viz/2023 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2012-13) Kakatiya Sangham Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.4-348 Ward-1 Bypass Road (Chivatam) Tanuku Tanuku, West Godavari Dist. [Pan : Aaatk7209H] अपीलधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Shri O.N.Hari Prasada Rao, Dr सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.04.2023 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 15.06.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy: Condonation Of Delay : This Appeal Is Filed By The Assessee Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)], National Faceless Appeal Centre (Nfac), Delhi In Din & Order No.Itba/Nfac/S/250/2022-23/1043166326(1) Dated 25.05.2022 For The Assessment Year (A.Y.) 2012-13, Arising Out Of The Order Passed U/S 143(3) Of The Income Tax Act, 1961 (In Short ‘Act’) Dated 23.09.2014 With The Delay Of 183 Days. The Assessee Filed Petition For Condonation Of Delay, Submitting That The Order Of The Ld.Cit(A), Nfac, Delhi Was Passed

condone the delay and admit the appeal for adjudication. 2. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee society was registered u/s 12A of the Act w.e.f.26.05.2003, The assessee receives voluntary contributions and fee for maintaining marriage halls. For the A.Y.2012- 13, the assessee filed it’s return of income, declaring Nil income, against which, the AO completed

PARASURAM KESARI,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-5(4), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

47,78,100/- against the original amount of Rs. 26,36,900/- and raised a tax demand of Rs. 34,06,117/- in his order dated 30/06/2017. Against this order of the Ld. AO passed U/s. 154 of the Act, the assessee filed an appeal before the Ld. CIT (A)-NFAC with a delay of 570 days. 3. Before

LATE RAMA KUMARI MUNNA REPRESENTED BY SHRI SHIVAYYA MUNNA HUSBAND LEGAL HEIR,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

2. Shorn off unnecessary details, the income of the assessee was assessed by the A.O vide his order passed under section 147 r.w.s. 144 of the Act, dated 31.03.2022, determining her income at Rs.93,47,704/-. 3. Aggrieved, the assessee assailed the impugned assessment order before the CIT(A), who vide his order dated 26.12.2024 dismissed the same both

BHARATH YUVA SANKSHEMA SANGHAM,ELURU vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, ELURU

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआईटीए. नं. / Ita No. 160/Viz/2025 निर्धारणवर्ा/ Assessment Year:2018-19) Bharath Yuva Sankshema Sangham V. Income Tax Officer 20B-7-21/1 Income Tax Office C/O. Ayyappa Medicals Eluru, West Godavari Andhra Pradesh Gandhi Nagar, Eluru West Godavari District – 534002 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aidpg1046K] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri C. Subrahmanyam राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr.Ar

section 143(3) of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) dated 21.03.2021. 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal record that there is a delay of 19 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld. AR drew our attention to the affidavit filed

MOTURU CHANDRA SEKHARA RAO,USA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD 2(1), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

Bench: The Tribunal. In Respect Of The Belated Filing Of The Appeal, The Assessee Filed A Petition For Condonation Of Delay Along With An Affidavit & The Relevant Contents Are Scanned & Pasted Herein Below:

condone the delay of 47 days and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual, Non- resident Indian. As per the information available with the Department, the Ld. AO observed that the assessee had deposited cash of Rs. 50,00,000/- in his bank account with Andhra Bank

SRI SAI BALAJI TRANSPORT,KAKINADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KAKINADA

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.108/Viz/2024 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Sri Sai Balaji Transport Vs. Income Tax Officer D.No.41-2-22/8, Koppula Street Ward-1 Budampet Kakinada Kakinada [Pan : Acrfs3673C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

47,74,530/- and raised tax demand of Rs.7,08,25,539/-. 3. On being aggrieved, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A) with the delay of 98 days and the Ld.CIT(A) dismissed the appeal of the assessee, observing that the delay of 98 days in filing of appeal in this case is not condoned

AGRI GOLD FOODS AND FARM PRODUCTS LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA

Bench: Us:

condone the delay involved in the filing of the present appeal. 6. Succinctly stated, the assessee company, which is engaged in the business of manufacturing cattle feed and seeds, had filed its return of income for A.Y. 2007-08 on 26.04.2008, declaring a loss of (-) Rs. 1,59,44,684/-. The return of income was initially processed as such

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU vs. THE ANDHRA SUGARS LIMITED, TANUKU

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 380/Viz/2019 (धनिाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2012-13) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Andhra Sugars Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-1, Tanuku. Eluru. Pan: Aaact6357Q (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) सी.ओ सं. / C.O. No. 140/Viz/2019 [आयक अपील सं. से उत्पन्न / Arising Out Of I.T.A. No. 380/Viz/2019(A.Y. 2012-13)] M/S. Andhra Sugars Ltd., Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Tanuku. Income Tax, Circle-1, Pan: Aaact6357Q Eluru. अपीलार्थीकीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca प्रत्यार्थीकीओरसे/ Revenue By : Dr.Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr

condone the delay of 07 days in filing the Revenue appeal and proceed to adjudicate the case on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee M/s. the Andhra Sugars Limited is a domestic company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of sugar and other chemical products and power generation, filed its return of income

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015

RIMMALPUDI BHASKARA PATTABHI RAMANA CHOUDARY,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, five appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.46 To 67/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2016-17) Rimmalpudi Bhaskara Pattabhi Vs. Income Tax Officer, Ramana Choudary, Tds, Ward-1, Rajahmundry. Rajahmundry. Pan: Afcpr 2275 M (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri On Hari Prasada Rao, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तार"ख / Date Of Hearing : 16/03/2023 घोषणा क" तार"ख/Date Of : 31/03/2023 Pronouncement O R D E R

condone the delay in filing the appeal before the Appellate Authority and confirmed the action of the Ld. AO and dismissed the assessee’s appeal. 8. Considering the facts of the present case, I am of the considered view since the enabling provision for computation of fee while processing the statements was inserted in section 200A only w.e.f 1/6/2015