Search: condonation of delay

3 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Jclear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 44A3 Section 143(1)(a)3 Section 194J3 Section 194I3 Section 201(1)3 Section 143(1)2 Section 143(3)2 Section 1482 Addition to Income

AUDREY BERNICE ROY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 494/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 194JSection 44A

194J) and the reply of the assessee was not taken into consideration as sec 44ADA though shown in sec 143(1)(a) in the proposed adjustment. Therefore, the same is beyond the scope of Provision of Sec 143(1). 5.2 ADDITIONS MADE ON IRRELEVANT MATERIAL, NON- EXISTENT FACT OR ON PRESUMPTION, ON CONJECTURES, SURMISES NOT SUSTAINABLE

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1) (TDS), VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., TIRUPATHI

The appeal of the assessee is dismissed

AUDREY BERNICE ROY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1) (TDS), VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., TIRUPATHI

AUDREY BERNICE ROY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1) (TDS), VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S SOUTHERN POWER DISTRIBUTION COMPANY OF A.P. LTD., TIRUPATHI

ARIMILLI RAMA KRISHNA,WEST GODAVARI DIST vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY