BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194A(3)(iii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh76Nagpur15Bangalore14Chennai14Hyderabad12Mumbai11Raipur7Kolkata7Delhi6Surat5Pune5Rajkot5Visakhapatnam4Jaipur3SC3Ahmedabad2Indore1Cuttack1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)4Section 1924Section 2634Section 194A2Section 2012Deduction2TDS2Addition to Income2Survey u/s 133A

THE KRISHNA DISTRICT MILK PRODUCERS MUTUALLY AIDED CO-OPERATIVE UNION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, , VIJAYAWADA

ITA 43/VIZ/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Mar 2021AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, FCAFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Sonawal, CIT DR
Section 263

iii) Substantial justice being paramount and pivotal the technical considerations should not be given undue and uncalled for emphasis. (M/s. The Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Co-op. Union Ltd.) iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the counsel or litigant is to be taken note

THE KRISHNA DISTRICT MILK PRODUCERS MUTUALLY AIDED CO-OPERATIVE UNION LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), , VIJAYAWADA

ITA 42/VIZ/2020[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam
2
Limitation/Time-bar2
Condonation of Delay2
22 Mar 2021
AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri N.K. Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon'Ble

For Appellant: Shri C.Subrahmanyam, FCAFor Respondent: Shri D.K. Sonawal, CIT DR
Section 263

iii) Substantial justice being paramount and pivotal the technical considerations should not be given undue and uncalled for emphasis. (M/s. The Krishna District Milk Producers Mutually Aided Co-op. Union Ltd.) iv) No presumption can be attached to deliberate causation of delay but, gross negligence on the part of the counsel or litigant is to be taken note

STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD (PRESENTLY MERGED WITH SBI),VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bank are allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 382/VIZ/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Oct 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 382 & 383/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16) State Bank Of Hyderabad Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Presently Merged With (Tds), State Bank Of India), Tds Ward-1, South Central Railway Vijayawada. Branch, Near Railway Station, Vijayawada- 520001. Pan: Aaacs8577K (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Smt. Venkata Suseela, Advocate (For Sri M.V. Prasad, Ca) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 07/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 10/10/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order

For Appellant: Smt. Venkata SuseelaFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 192Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

condonation of the delay involved in filing the appeal. 13. Smt. Venkata Suseela, Advocate, the Learned Authorized Representative (for short “Ld. AR”) for the assessee, at the threshold of hearing of the appeal, submitted that both the lower authorities had grossly erred in law and facts of the case in treating the assessee as being in default even

STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD ( PRESENTLY MERGED WITH SBI),VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VIJAYAWADA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee bank are allowed for statistical purposes in terms of our aforesaid observations

ITA 383/VIZ/2025[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Oct 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita Nos. 382 & 383/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Years: 2014-15 & 2015-16) State Bank Of Hyderabad Vs. The Income Tax Officer (Presently Merged With (Tds), State Bank Of India), Tds Ward-1, South Central Railway Vijayawada. Branch, Near Railway Station, Vijayawada- 520001. Pan: Aaacs8577K (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Smt. Venkata Suseela, Advocate (For Sri M.V. Prasad, Ca) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 07/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 10/10/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order

For Appellant: Smt. Venkata SuseelaFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR
Section 192Section 194ASection 201Section 201(1)

condonation of the delay involved in filing the appeal. 13. Smt. Venkata Suseela, Advocate, the Learned Authorized Representative (for short “Ld. AR”) for the assessee, at the threshold of hearing of the appeal, submitted that both the lower authorities had grossly erred in law and facts of the case in treating the assessee as being in default even