Search: condonation of delay

4 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 194Aclear

Sorted by relevance

Nagpur100 Chandigarh80 Chennai22 Mumbai19 Hyderabad16 Pune16 Delhi15 Jaipur14 Bangalore10 Cochin7 Raipur6 Ahmedabad5 Kolkata5 Rajkot5 Visakhapatnam4 Panaji3 SC3 Lucknow3 Jodhpur2 Surat2 Indore1

Key Topics

Section 201(1)4 Section 1924 TDS4 Section 194A3 Section 1473 Deduction3 Section 2012 Section 143(1)2 Addition to Income2

NATA RAJA TRADERS,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 270/VIZ/2024[2022-23]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam23 Aug 2024AY 2022-23

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.270/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2022-23) Nata Raja Traders, Vs. The Income Tax Officer, Guntur. Ward-1(1), Pan: Aaefn2642P Guntur. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Smt. A. Aruna, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई क" तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 14/08/2024 घोषणा क" तारीख/Date Of : 23/08/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R

For Appellant: Smt. A. Aruna, ARFor Respondent: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. AR

Section 143(1)Section 194QSection 249(2)

section 194Q of the Act and 194A of the Act for delayed payments, if any. The assessee had mentioned these details in column 14(IV) of the P & L Account. However, while processing the assessee’s return of income, the Ld. AO / CPC disallowed the assessee’s claim of TDS credit and passed the intimation

NATA RAJA TRADERS,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUNTUR

NATA RAJA TRADERS,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1(1), GUNTUR

STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD (PRESENTLY MERGED WITH SBI),VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VIJAYAWADA

STATE BANK OF HYDERABAD ( PRESENTLY MERGED WITH SBI),VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, TDS WARD-1, VIJAYAWADA

SRI SAI BALAJI TRANSPORT,KAKINADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, KAKINADA