Search: condonation of delay

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 160clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 201(1)10 Section 143(1)5 Section 1445 Section 142(1)4 Section 44A4 Section 1474 Section 2014 Section 143(3)3 Condonation of Delay

AUDREY BERNICE ROY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 494/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 194JSection 44A

160 taxmann.com 629 8.2 Otherwise defense mechanism fails rather otiose, even when the situation is looked at from time barred aspect too. Since this is also not a mistake of assessee, since Intimation u/s 143(1). Page. No 4 I.T.A.No.494/VIZ/2025 Audrey Bernice Roy The same is not downloadable though hanging in the e-portal. However, the assessee is liable

PONNAM BHAVANI,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), VIJAYAWADA

In the result, both the appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purposes

AUDREY BERNICE ROY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

PONNAM BHAVANI,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), VIJAYAWADA

AUDREY BERNICE ROY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

PONNAM BHAVANI,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), VIJAYAWADA

PONNAM BHAVANI,VIJAYAWADA vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), VIJAYAWADA

SRINIVASA RAO SIRIVURI PROPRIETOR,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM

JAMI PRADHAMIKA VYAVASAYASHARAKARA PARAPATHI SANGHAM LTD.,,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME-TAX OFFICER, VIZIANAGARAM

SRI RAJANI GOLD,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1(1), VIJAYAWADA

SRI VIJAYA EDUCATIONAL AND CULTURAL SOCIETY,CHALLAPALLI vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, MACHILIPATNAM

THE ETIKOPPAKA COOP AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIAL SOCIETY LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE 2(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM