BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

179 results for “condonation of delay”+ Section 143(1)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai1,593Delhi1,055Chennai1,052Kolkata877Bangalore543Ahmedabad474Pune473Hyderabad427Jaipur340Chandigarh267Indore258Surat245Visakhapatnam179Cochin177Rajkot169Lucknow166Raipur150Patna138Nagpur127Amritsar119Panaji90Agra73Cuttack71Jodhpur34Guwahati31Dehradun29Jabalpur25Allahabad22SC15Ranchi12Varanasi12

Key Topics

Section 143(3)97Condonation of Delay76Section 143(2)49Addition to Income44Section 142(1)38Section 143(1)37Section 1134Section 80P25Cash Deposit

GUNTUBOLU UMA SAI PRASAD,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 97/VIZ/2023[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Jul 2023AY 2020-21

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri I. Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] for the AYs 2018-19 and 2019-20. 3. At the outset, we noted from the appeal record that there is a delay of 11 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. In this regard, the Ld. DR drawn our attention to the Affidavit filed by the Asst. Commissioner

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GUNTUBOLU UMA SAI PRASAD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

Showing 1–20 of 179 · Page 1 of 9

...
23
Section 25021
Deduction20
Section 15418
ITA 226/VIZ/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Jul 2023AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri I. Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] for the AYs 2018-19 and 2019-20. 3. At the outset, we noted from the appeal record that there is a delay of 11 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. In this regard, the Ld. DR drawn our attention to the Affidavit filed by the Asst. Commissioner

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. GUNTUBOLU UMA SAI PRASAD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is dismissed

ITA 227/VIZ/2022[2019-20]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam17 Jul 2023AY 2019-20

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

For Appellant: Sri I. Kama Sastry, ARFor Respondent: Sri ON Hari Prasada Rao
Section 143(1)Section 36(1)(va)

143(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] for the AYs 2018-19 and 2019-20. 3. At the outset, we noted from the appeal record that there is a delay of 11 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. In this regard, the Ld. DR drawn our attention to the Affidavit filed by the Asst. Commissioner

AUDREY BERNICE ROY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 494/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Feb 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble

Section 143(1)Section 143(1)(a)Section 154Section 194JSection 44A

Section 249(2) of the Act. In column no. 14 of Form No. 35, the appellant has admitted to the delay in filing and has given the reason for condonation of delay which is as under:-. "There is a delay 1501 days due to non availability or non communication of intimation u/s 143(1

ARIMILLI RAMA KRISHNA,WEST GODAVARI DIST vs. ACIT, CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

ITA 639/VIZ/2025[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam18 Mar 2026AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri Omkareshwar Chidara, Hon’Ble

Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 147Section 148Section 194CSection 194JSection 2(22)(e)Section 263

1) of the Act. 15. Although the Ld. Sr. DR had tried to impress upon us that for framing of assessment pursuant to the return of income filed by the assessee in response to notice under section 148 of the Act, there is no further obligation cast upon the AO to issue a notice under section 143

ADIMULAM SATYANARAYANA PROPRIETOR,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed in terms of my aforesaid observations

ITA 472/VIZ/2025[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam04 Mar 2026AY 2017-18

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON'BLE (Judicial Member)

Section 115BSection 13Section 133(6)Section 139(4)Section 142(1)Section 143(2)Section 144Section 69A

1) of the Act, dated 29/11/2019 5 Adimulam Satyanarayana Proprietor vs. ITO to furnish a copy of the letter wherein the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-1, Visakhapatnam had condoned the delay and allowed him to file his return of income under section 139(4) r.w.s 119(2)(b) of the Act for the subject year, but the assessee failed

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. VENKATA SITA RAMACHANDRA RAO KANCHUMARTHY, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed

ITA 352/VIZ/2025[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam07 Nov 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.352/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year:2016-17) Vs. Dy. Commissioner Of Income Tax Venkata Sita Ramachandra Rao Kanchumarty International Taxation, Circle H.No. 26-22-16 Ground Floor, Infinity Tower Near Chinna Anjaneya Swamy Temple Sankarmattam Road Danavaipeta, Rajahmundry Visakhapatnam – 530016 East Godavari District – 533103 Andhra Pradesh Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Edzpk3519Q]

Section 143(2)Section 148Section 271(1)(c)Section 292B

143(2) and 142(1) of the Act assessee’s representatives filed requisite information called for. Ld.Assessing Officer [hereinafter in short “Ld. AO"] during the course of scrutiny proceedings recomputed the Long-Term Capital Gains at Rs.9,77,03,500/-. Being aggrieved by the order of the Ld. AO, assessee filed an appeal before Ld.CIT(A), Hyderabad, wherein he partly

AGRI GOLD FOODS AND FARM PRODUCTS LIMITED,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASST.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1), VIJAYAWADA

ITA 2000/HYD/2017[2007-08]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam09 Sept 2025AY 2007-08

Bench: Us:

Section 143(3)

condone the delay involved in the filing of the present appeal. 6. Succinctly stated, the assessee company, which is engaged in the business of manufacturing cattle feed and seeds, had filed its return of income for A.Y. 2007-08 on 26.04.2008, declaring a loss of (-) Rs. 1,59,44,684/-. The return of income was initially processed as such

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 386/VIZ/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 394/VIZ/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 393/VIZ/2024[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 388/VIZ/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 392/VIZ/2024[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 385/VIZ/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 384/VIZ/2024[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 395/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 381/VIZ/2024[2005-06]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2005-06

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 387/VIZ/2024[2009-10]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2009-10

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 390/VIZ/2024[2011-12]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2011-12

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTION CIRCLE), VIJAYAWADA vs. VISAKHAPATNAM URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the Revenue is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated herein above

ITA 389/VIZ/2024[2010-11]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam20 Aug 2025AY 2010-11

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.Nos.381 To 396/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2005-06 To 2015-16, 2017-18 & 2018-19) Asst. Commissioner Of Income Tax V. Visakhapatnam Urban Development Authority Siripuram, Visakhapatnam Stalin Corporate Andhra Pradesh 4Th Floor, Vijayawada – 520007 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaalv0082F]

143(3) 04.07.2024 25/1066392194(1) 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal records that there is a delay of 9 days in filing the appeals before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld.DR drew our attention to the affidavit filed by the revenue along with a petition seeking for condonation