AUDREY BERNICE ROY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble

127(1), where all the notices/Intimations were uploaded in the e-portal, and just presumed that the same was served properly to assessee. It was clearly held in the following case law: [Court Rules in Favour of Fair Hearing] "Placing notice on e-portal is not service; Communication cannot be 'presumed'." MUNJAL BCU CENTRE OF INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP

COASTAL ENGINEERING & EQUIPEMENTS (INDIA) PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, CIRCLE-1(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A. No. 138/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2020-21) Coastal Engineering & Equipments V. Income Tax Officer – Circle 1(1) (India) Private Limited Income Tax Office 30-1-1/7, Flat No. 201 Pratyakshakar Bhawan Neeladri Complex Mvp Double Road, South Jail Road, Daba Gardens Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh Visakhapatnam – 530020 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaecc3619C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 143(3) r.w.s. 144B of Income Tax Act, 1961 (in short ‘Act’) dated 25.09.2022 for the A.Y. 2020-21. 2. At the outset, it is noticed from the appeal record that there is a delay of 127 days in filing the appeal before the Tribunal. Explaining the reasons for belated filing of the appeal, the Ld. Authorised Representative [hereinafter

SADHIKA GANNI,RAJAHMUNDRY vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE - 2,, RAJAHMUNDRY

Bench: Us:

127 of the ITAct for transferring the Jurisdiction of the assessee from AD Hyd to ÃO Rjy, such transfer purportedly said to have occurred on dt.5.11.2018, raises a fundamental question, how a manual notice u/s 143(2) could be issued by AO Rjy on dt. 11.08.2018. iv. Without prejudice to ground no ill" the issuance of manual notice

KVC INFRASTRUCTURES,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, VISAKHAPATNAM

The appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes, in terms of our aforesaid observations

Bench: Us:

127 and Section 282 of the Income- tax Act. 4. Failure to Consider Detailed Reply to Notice under Section 142(1): The AO ignored the appellant's response to the notice under Section 142(1), which included supporting documents and clarifications. 5. Invalid Invocation of Section 145(3): The AO invoked Section 145(3) without pointing out any defects

SRI GOLUGURI NAGI REDDY,VIJAYAWADA vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX,CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.139/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2014-15) Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vs. Acit, Flat No.5, Shiridi Sai Apartments, Central Circle-1, Balasumudi, Bhimavaram. Rajahmundry. Pan: Abkpg 1138 J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.140/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2017-18) Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vs. Acit, Flat No.5, Shiridi Sai Apartments, Central Circle-1, Balasumudi, Bhimavaram. Rajahmundry. Pan: Abkpg1138 J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri M.V. Prasad, Ca ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

127(2)(a) of the Act passed by the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry in F.No. 62/Juris./CIT/RJY/2017-18, dated 28/8/2017. Accordingly, notice u/s. 153A was issued on 10/02/2018 and served on the assessee on 16/2/2018. In response, the assessee filed its return of income on 18/3/2018. Subsequently, notice U/s. 143(2) of the Act was issued on 25/05/2018

SRI GOLUGURI NAGI REDDY,VIJAYAWADA vs. AASISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1,, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.139/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2014-15) Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vs. Acit, Flat No.5, Shiridi Sai Apartments, Central Circle-1, Balasumudi, Bhimavaram. Rajahmundry. Pan: Abkpg 1138 J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.140/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year :2017-18) Sri Goluguri Nagi Reddy, Vs. Acit, Flat No.5, Shiridi Sai Apartments, Central Circle-1, Balasumudi, Bhimavaram. Rajahmundry. Pan: Abkpg1138 J (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Assessee By : Sri M.V. Prasad, Ca ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Revenue By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

127(2)(a) of the Act passed by the Ld. Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax, Rajahmundry in F.No. 62/Juris./CIT/RJY/2017-18, dated 28/8/2017. Accordingly, notice u/s. 153A was issued on 10/02/2018 and served on the assessee on 16/2/2018. In response, the assessee filed its return of income on 18/3/2018. Subsequently, notice U/s. 143(2) of the Act was issued on 25/05/2018

SRINIVAS BALLA,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as indicated hereinabove

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No.11/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2017-18) Srinivas Balla, Vs. Asst. Commissioner Of Visakhapatnam. Income Tax, Circle-2(1), Pan: Ahipb 8232 A Visakhapatnam. (अपीलधर्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलधर्थी की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri C. Subrahmanyam, Ar प्रत्यधर्थी की ओर से / Revenue By : Dr. Villuri Aparna, Sr. Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 26/03/2024 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of : 19/04/2024 Pronouncement O R D E R Per Duvvuru Rl Reddy:

condone the delay of 11 days in filing the 3 appeal before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeal on merits in the following paragraphs. 4. Briefly stated the facts of the case are that the assessee is an individual deriving income from trading in Indian Made Foreign Liquor [IMFL] filed his return of income

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-1, , ELURU vs. THE ANDHRA SUGARS LIMITED, TANUKU

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No. 380/Viz/2019 (धनिाारणिर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2012-13) Assistant Commissioner Of Vs. M/S. Andhra Sugars Ltd., Income Tax, Circle-1, Tanuku. Eluru. Pan: Aaact6357Q (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) सी.ओ सं. / C.O. No. 140/Viz/2019 [आयक अपील सं. से उत्पन्न / Arising Out Of I.T.A. No. 380/Viz/2019(A.Y. 2012-13)] M/S. Andhra Sugars Ltd., Vs. Assistant Commissioner Of Tanuku. Income Tax, Circle-1, Pan: Aaact6357Q Eluru. अपीलार्थीकीओरसे/ Assessee By : Shri C. Subrahmanyam, Ca प्रत्यार्थीकीओरसे/ Revenue By : Dr.Satyasai Rath, Cit-Dr

condone the delay of 07 days in filing the Revenue appeal and proceed to adjudicate the case on merits. 3. Brief facts of the case are that the assessee M/s. the Andhra Sugars Limited is a domestic company engaged in the business of manufacture and sale of sugar and other chemical products and power generation, filed its return of income

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY ,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY ,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

SHYAM SUNDAR POLISETTY,GUNTUR vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, GUNTUR

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee for the AY 2013-

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. Nos. 260 To 267/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Years: 2013-14 To 2020-21)

condone the delay of 58 days in filing all the present appeals of the assessee before the Tribunal and proceed to adjudicate the appeals on merits. 4. Firstly, we shall take up the appeal ITA No.260/Viz/2023 for the AY 2013-14 as a lead appeal. 5. Briefly stated the facts of the case relevant

MADINA RASOOL SHAIK,GUNTUR vs. ITO, WARD-1, NARASARAOPET

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.422/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year:2017-18) Madina Rasool Shaik, Vs. Income Tax Officer, Guntur. Ward-1, Pan: Ahfpr3787D Guntur. (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri S. Rama Rao, Advocate (Hybrid) राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Dr. Aparna Villuri, Sr. Ar सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of 01/12/2025 Hearing: घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 05/12/2025 Pronouncement: आदेश / Order Per. Ravish Sood, Jm :

2. Succinctly stated, the AO based on information available in AIMS module of ITBA, which revealed that the assessee had during the demonetization period made substantial cash deposits in his bank accounts, but had not filed his return of income within the “due date” specified under section 139 of the Act, issued notice under section