BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

8 results for “condonation of delay”+ Permanent Establishmentclear

Sorted by relevance

Chennai131Karnataka128Delhi124Mumbai108Kolkata49Jaipur46Amritsar37Hyderabad34Cochin30Bangalore27Pune21Ahmedabad16Cuttack15Guwahati14Raipur14Lucknow13Visakhapatnam8Chandigarh7SC6Rajasthan5Rajkot5Telangana5Indore4Varanasi4Jodhpur3Nagpur3Surat2Calcutta1Allahabad1Patna1Orissa1Andhra Pradesh1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)4Section 1314Section 31(1)4Condonation of Delay4Deduction4Addition to Income4

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 416/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 2. These appeals are filed by the assessee and the revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam, vide I.T.A.No.0009/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1),VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018 and I.T.A.No.10409/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1), VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018. Cross Objections are also filed by the assessee supporting

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 474/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 2. These appeals are filed by the assessee and the revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam, vide I.T.A.No.0009/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1),VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018 and I.T.A.No.10409/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1), VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018. Cross Objections are also filed by the assessee supporting

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED, , VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 475/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 2. These appeals are filed by the assessee and the revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam, vide I.T.A.No.0009/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1),VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018 and I.T.A.No.10409/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1), VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018. Cross Objections are also filed by the assessee supporting

RADHIKA VEGETABLE OILS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue as well as the assessee and cross objections of the assessee are dismissed

ITA 415/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Apr 2019AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.415 & 416/Viz/2018 (निर्धारण वर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) आयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.474 & 475/Viz/2018 (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Years : 2013-14 & 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. M/S Radhika Vegetable Income Tax Oils(P) Ltd., Circle-3(1) Sreeram Nagar Visakhapatnam Garividi, Vizianagaram [Pan : Aaacr8333C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co No.132 & 133/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.474/Viz/2018 & 475/Viz/2018 Respectively) (निर्धारणवर्ा/Assessment Year: 2013-14 & 2014-15) Z M/S Radhika Vegetable Oils(P) Ltd., Vs. Asst.Commissioner Of Sreeram Nagar Income Tax Garividi, Vizianagaram Circle-3(1) [Pan : Aaacr8333C] Visakhapatnam (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) रधजस्व की ओर से /Revenue By : Smt Suman Malik, Dr निर्धाऩरती की ओर से / Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 16.04.2019 घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 30 .04.2019

For Appellant: Shri G.V.N.Hari, ARFor Respondent: Smt Suman Malik, DR
Section 131Section 143(2)

delay in filing the appeal is condoned and the appeal is admitted. 2. These appeals are filed by the assessee and the revenue against the orders of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [CIT(A)]-1, Visakhapatnam, vide I.T.A.No.0009/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1),VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018 and I.T.A.No.10409/2016-17/ACIT-C-3(1), VSP/2017-18 dated 21.06.2018. Cross Objections are also filed by the assessee supporting

THE DY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT CO -OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD,, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 301/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Nov 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S The Krishna District Co- Income Tax Operative Central Bank Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co Nos.70 & 71/Viz/2017 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Co Nos.60 & 61/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) M/S The Krishna District Co-Operative Deputy Commissioner Of Central Bank Ltd., Income Tax Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Sri D. K. Sonowal,Cit Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018

For Appellant: Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Sri D. K. Sonowal,CIT DR
Section 31(1)

delayed receipt of cash flows and hence, should not be reversed to the P&L Account. The amount of such provision should, therefore, be carried till the account s finally settled and after receipt of the Government's contribution under the Scheme, the amount should be reversed to the General Reserves below the line.” From the above circular

THE DY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT CO -OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD,, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 302/VIZ/2017[2012-2013]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Nov 2018AY 2012-2013

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S The Krishna District Co- Income Tax Operative Central Bank Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co Nos.70 & 71/Viz/2017 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Co Nos.60 & 61/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) M/S The Krishna District Co-Operative Deputy Commissioner Of Central Bank Ltd., Income Tax Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Sri D. K. Sonowal,Cit Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018

For Appellant: Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Sri D. K. Sonowal,CIT DR
Section 31(1)

delayed receipt of cash flows and hence, should not be reversed to the P&L Account. The amount of such provision should, therefore, be carried till the account s finally settled and after receipt of the Government's contribution under the Scheme, the amount should be reversed to the General Reserves below the line.” From the above circular

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 100/VIZ/2018[2013-14]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Nov 2018AY 2013-14

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S The Krishna District Co- Income Tax Operative Central Bank Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co Nos.70 & 71/Viz/2017 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Co Nos.60 & 61/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) M/S The Krishna District Co-Operative Deputy Commissioner Of Central Bank Ltd., Income Tax Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Sri D. K. Sonowal,Cit Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018

For Appellant: Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Sri D. K. Sonowal,CIT DR
Section 31(1)

delayed receipt of cash flows and hence, should not be reversed to the P&L Account. The amount of such provision should, therefore, be carried till the account s finally settled and after receipt of the Government's contribution under the Scheme, the amount should be reversed to the General Reserves below the line.” From the above circular

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for the A

ITA 101/VIZ/2018[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam28 Nov 2018AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S The Krishna District Co- Income Tax Operative Central Bank Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co Nos.70 & 71/Viz/2017 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Co Nos.60 & 61/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) M/S The Krishna District Co-Operative Deputy Commissioner Of Central Bank Ltd., Income Tax Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Sri D. K. Sonowal,Cit Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018

For Appellant: Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, ARFor Respondent: Sri D. K. Sonowal,CIT DR
Section 31(1)

delayed receipt of cash flows and hence, should not be reversed to the P&L Account. The amount of such provision should, therefore, be carried till the account s finally settled and after receipt of the Government's contribution under the Scheme, the amount should be reversed to the General Reserves below the line.” From the above circular