SWARAJ FOUNDATION,VISAKHAPATANAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee trust in ITA

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI BALAKRISHNAN. S, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

5. Subsequently, the assessee trust filed “Form 10AB” on 24.03.2024 for permanent registration under Section 12AB of the Act. 6. The CIT(Exemptions), during the course of proceedings initiated under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iv), issued notice dated 10.06.2024 and 01.07.2024 and called upon the assessee trust to file its memorandum of association/trust deed and other documents. On examination

SWARAJ FOUNDATION,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee trust in ITA

Bench: SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member), SHRI BALAKRISHNAN. S, HON’BLE (Accountant Member)

5. Subsequently, the assessee trust filed “Form 10AB” on 24.03.2024 for permanent registration under Section 12AB of the Act. 6. The CIT(Exemptions), during the course of proceedings initiated under Section 12A(1)(ac)(iv), issued notice dated 10.06.2024 and 01.07.2024 and called upon the assessee trust to file its memorandum of association/trust deed and other documents. On examination

LEADER PEOPLE SERVICE CHARITABLE TRUST,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood & Shri Balakrishnan S.आ.अपी.सं /Ita No.471/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: Na) Leader People Service Vs. The Income Tax Officer Charitable Trust, (Exemption Ward), Visakhapatnam. Visakhapatnam. Pan: Aabtl4868N (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा"रती "ारा/Assessee By: Sri Gvn Hari, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By: Sri Badicala Yadagiri, Cit- Dr सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 09/10/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of 29/10/2025 Pronouncement: O R D E R "ित रवीश सूद, जे.एम./Per Ravish Sood, J.M. The Present Appeal Filed By The Assessee Trust Is Directed Against The Order Passed By The Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions) [Hereinafter Referred To As “Cit(Exemptions)”], Hyderabad, Dated 17.06.2025 Rejecting Its Application Filed In “Form No. 10Ab” For Regular Registration Under Section 80G(5) Of The Income-Tax Act, 1961 (For Short, “The Act”). The Assessee

5 Leader People Service Charitable Trust vs. ITO (Exemption Ward) 10. Admittedly, the assessee trust that was granted provisional registration under Section

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTIONS), , VIJAYAWADA vs. CARE AND SHARE CHARITABLE TRUST, , VIJAYAWADA

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue and the cross objection filed by the assessee are dismissed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Ble

5. On being aggrieved, the department is in appeal before this Tribunal. 6. Ground Nos. 1 & 6 are general in nature, no adjudication is required, therefore, same are dismissed. 7. Ground Nos. 2 & 3 raised by the department on the ground that ld. CIT(A) deleted the addition without giving opportunity to the Assessing Officer which is amounting to violation

SREERAM BHAGAWATHI AYYAPPA SEVA TRUST,KAKINADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KAKINADA

In the result, the impugned order dated 13

Bench: rejection.”

charitable and religious nature. 4. The rejection order is mechanical and arbitrary, as it does not specify how the trust’s activities deviate from its stated objectives. 5. The Ld. CIT(E) failed to apply the principle of natural justice by not providing an opportunity for further clarification before rejection.” 3. Succinctly stated, the assessee trust was constituted

SREERAM BHAGAWATHI AYYAPPA SEVA TRUST,KAKINADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, KAKINADA

In the result, the impugned order dated 13

Bench: rejection.”

charitable and religious nature. 4. The rejection order is mechanical and arbitrary, as it does not specify how the trust’s activities deviate from its stated objectives. 5. The Ld. CIT(E) failed to apply the principle of natural justice by not providing an opportunity for further clarification before rejection.” 3. Succinctly stated, the assessee trust was constituted

DHATRI FOUNDATION, ,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX(EXEMPTION), , HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the Assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri N.K. Choudhry, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon'Ble

5. Once an exemption is granted for charitable activities, the religious activities are also included. Two judgments of the Supreme Court, although they were pronounced before the amendment of the definition of “charitable purpose” are still relevant. The Supreme Court held that, if the primary or dominant purpose of an institution was charitable any other object which by itself might

RAMYA CHARITABLE TRUST,KAKINADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is partly allowed

Bench: Shri K. Narasimha Chary, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.61/Viz/2024 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) Ramya Charitable Trust V. Ito (Exemption Ward) D.No. 9-11-130 Income Tax Office Elvinpeta, Kakinada – 533004 Aayakar Bhavan Andhra Pradesh Veerabhadrapuram Rajahmundry – 533105 [Pan: Aactr4315H] Andhra Pradesh (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 11 of the Act. Ld. CIT(A) issued various notices for which assessee submitted written submissions Page No. 3 I.T.A.No.61/VIZ/2024 Ramya Charitable Trust electronically. Assessee also filed a petition for admission of additional evidences which was referred to the Ld. AO vide letter dated 16.05.2023. Ld. AO in response submitted the Remand Report on 30.06.2023. Ld. AO citing

THE KRISHNA DISTRICT LORRY OWNERS ASSOCIATIONS,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, EXEMPTION WARD, RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआईटीए. नं. / Ita No. 160/Viz/2024 (A.Y. 2018-19) The Krishna District Lorry Owners Associations V. Income Tax Officer –Exemption Ward 40-13-1/1, Near Benz Circle Rajahmundry Chandramoulipuram, Vijayawada – 520010 Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aaatt4359H] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

charitable nature of the trust's objectives, despite prior approval and registration under section 12A of the IT Act. This decision lacks a valid basis and contravenes established legal principles. Page No. 3 The Krishna District Lorry Owners Associations 5

SRI KANAKA MAHALAKSHMI AMMAVARI TEMPLE,BURUJUPETA vs. CPC, BANGALORE

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Laliet Kumar, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./I.T.A.No.358/Viz/2024 (िनधा"रण वष"/ Assessment Year: 2015-16) Sri Kanaka Mahalakshmi Ammavari Temple V. Centralized Processing Center D.No. 22-71-26/B, Skml Temple Bangalore. Kotha Road, Burujupeta Visakhapatnam – 530001, Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaajs1861M] (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""थ"/ Respondent)

charitable trusts/institutions. Admittedly, in the present case when the registration was granted on March 5, 2010, with effect from April 1, 2008, the assessment proceedings for 2007-08 were pending before the Assessing Officer. Therefore, the assessee cannot be treated as an association of persons and is required to be treated as registered trust under section

VGR DIABETES EDUCATION AND AWARENESS CHARITABLE TRUST,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER(EXEMPTION WARD), RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.101/Viz/2024 & 102/Viz/2024 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :-Na-) Vgr Diabetes Education & Vs. Income Tax Officer Awareness Charitable Trust (Exemption Ward) D.No.40-5-19/18B Rajahmundry Vgr Diabetes Specialities Hospital A S Ramarao Road Mogalrajpuram, Vijayawada [Pan : Aabtv8428J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 80G5(iv) instead of 80G(5)(i). A show cause notice dated 01.02.2024 was issued regarding proposal for rejection of Form No.10AB as infructuous.. The assessee submitted it’s reply stating that they had 3 I.T.A. No.101/Viz/2024 & 102/Viz/2024 VGR Diabetes Education and Awareness Charitable Trust

VGR DIABETES EDUCATION AND AWARENESS CHARITABLE TRUST,VIJAYAWADA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeals of the assessee are allowed for statistical purpose

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.101/Viz/2024 & 102/Viz/2024 (ननधधारण वर्ा / Assessment Year :-Na-) Vgr Diabetes Education & Vs. Income Tax Officer Awareness Charitable Trust (Exemption Ward) D.No.40-5-19/18B Rajahmundry Vgr Diabetes Specialities Hospital A S Ramarao Road Mogalrajpuram, Vijayawada [Pan : Aabtv8428J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 80G5(iv) instead of 80G(5)(i). A show cause notice dated 01.02.2024 was issued regarding proposal for rejection of Form No.10AB as infructuous.. The assessee submitted it’s reply stating that they had 3 I.T.A. No.101/Viz/2024 & 102/Viz/2024 VGR Diabetes Education and Awareness Charitable Trust

APEX FOUNDATION,PANASAPADU vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS), HYDERABAD

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./ I.T.A. No.653/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year :Na) Apex Foundation, Vs. The Commissioner Of Income Kakinada. Tax (Exemptions), Pan: Aagta 1866 Q Hyderabad. (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri G.V.N. Hari प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

5. The Ld. AR submitted that as per the Companies Act, 2013 wherein under section 135 of the Act, the companies are allowed to set up a Trust to carry out CSR activities and for that the Trust should be formed by the assessee-company and the Income Tax Act also recognized the said section of the Companies

KALIGOTLA SNIGDHA SRIDEVI FOUNDATION,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.67/Viz/2025 Kaligotla Snigdha Sridevi Foundation V. Income Tax Officer (Exemption Ward) Income Tax Office Koligotla Vari Street Infinity Tower, Shankarmatham Road Chinna Bazar, Bheemunipatnam Santhipuram, Visakhapatnam – 530016 Visakhapatnam Andhra Pradesh [Pan:Aadtk1059J] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr.Satyasai Rath, Cit(Dr)

Trust v. CIT (E) in ITA No. 575 & 576/CHNY/2023 dated 26.12.2023. b. Mandava Foundation v. ITO in ITA No. 47/HYD/2024 dated 15.03.2024. 6. Per contra, Ld. Departmental Representative [hereinafter in short “Ld.DR”] relied on the impugned order and submitted that the Ld.CIT(E) justified in rejecting the application due to incorrect quoting of provisions. 7. We have heard rival contentions

NAGA SAMBASIVA CHARITABLE SERVICE TRUST,WEST GODAVARI DIST vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपीलसं./I.T.A.No.109/Viz/2025 Naga Sambasiva Charitable Service Trust V. Income Tax Officer (Exemption Ward) #3-18, Unguturu Income Tax Office, Aayakar Bhavan West Godavari District – 534411 Kambala Cheruvu, Veerabhadrapuram Andhra Pradesh Rajahmundry – 533105 Andhra Pradesh [Pan: Aaetn2042D] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) करदाता का प्रतततितित्व/ Assessee Represented By : Shri Gvn Hari, Advocate राजस्व का प्रतततितित्व/ Department Represented By : Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit(Dr)

Charitable Service Trust 4. The only issue contested by the assessee is with respect to rejection of the Registration under section 12AB of the Act by the Ld.CIT(E). 5

SRI VENKATACHARYA VAIDIKA SAMSTHAN,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD - 2(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed in limine

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.322 & 323/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2025-26) Sri Venkatacharya Vaidika Samsthan V. Income Tax Officer – Ward – 2(1)) 11-203, Sowmya Kuti, Prahladapuram 35, 50-92-35, Infinity Tower Visakhapatnam – 530027 Sankara Matam Road Opposite Reliance Fresh [Pan: Aaits2838J] Nearby Main Road, Madhura Nagar Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam 530016 (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 12A on an ex-parte basis without appreciating that there was a reasonable cause due to which the notices issued on email could not be complied with by the assessee trust. 2. The assessee submits that it is a trust genuinely engaged in charitable activities for past two decades, which was first granted registration u/s 12A vide Certificate

SRI VENKATACHARYA VAIDIKA SAMSTHAN,VISHAKHAPATNAM vs. ITO, WARD - 2(1), VISHAKHAPATNAM

In the result, both the appeals filed by the assessee are dismissed in limine

Bench: Shri Ravish Sood, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.Nos.322 & 323/Viz/2025 (निर्धारण वर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2025-26) Sri Venkatacharya Vaidika Samsthan V. Income Tax Officer – Ward – 2(1)) 11-203, Sowmya Kuti, Prahladapuram 35, 50-92-35, Infinity Tower Visakhapatnam – 530027 Sankara Matam Road Opposite Reliance Fresh [Pan: Aaits2838J] Nearby Main Road, Madhura Nagar Dwarakanagar, Visakhapatnam 530016 (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent)

section 12A on an ex-parte basis without appreciating that there was a reasonable cause due to which the notices issued on email could not be complied with by the assessee trust. 2. The assessee submits that it is a trust genuinely engaged in charitable activities for past two decades, which was first granted registration u/s 12A vide Certificate

ROTARY VIZIANAGARAM CENTRAL KAILASH BHOOMI SERVICE SOCIETY,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

charitable activities. Furthermore, the assessee had already been granted registration under section 12A.", "result": "Allowed", "sections": [ "80G", "80G(5)(i)", "12A" ], "issues": "Whether the CIT(E) was justified in rejecting the assessee's application for registration under Section 80G without proper discussion and consideration of the trust

VIJAYAM CHARITABLE TRUST,MANDAPETA vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTIONS WARD), RAJAHMUNDRY

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Vijay Pal Rao, Vice-A N D Shri S. Balakrishnanआ.अपी.सं /Ita No.87/Viz/2025 (िनधा"रण वष"/Assessment Year: 2023-24) Vijayam Charitable Trust Vs. Income Tax Officer Mandapeta, East Godavari (Exemption Ward) Pan:Aadtv2273R Rajahmundry (Appellant) (Respondent) िनधा""रती "ारा/Assessee By: Shri G.V.N. Hari, Advocate राज" व "ारा/Revenue By:: Dr. Satyasai Rath, Cit(Dr) सुनवाई की तारीख/Date Of Hearing: 23/04/2025 घोषणा की तारीख/Pronouncement: 28/04/2025 आदेश/Order Per S. Balakrishnan, A.M This Appeal Filed By The Assessee Is Directed Against The Rejection Order By The Learned Cit (E)- Hyderabad (Hereinafter In Short “Ld Cit(E)” Vide Din & Notice No.Itba/Exm/F/Exm45/ 2024-25/1071164001(1) Dated 12.12.2024. 2. Briefly Stated Facts Of The Case Are, Assessee Has Filed An E-Application In Form No.10Ab Seeking Registration U/S 80G Of The I.T. Act, 1961 (In Short “Act”). Learned Cit (E) Issued Notice To The Assessee In Respect Of Proceedings U/S 80G(5)(Iii) Of The Act To Page 1 Of 4

Trust are of charitable in nature and therefore, pleaded that rejection order may be cancelled. 5. Per contra, Ld. Departmental Representative (hereinafter in short “Ld.DR”) relied on the order of the learned CIT (E). 6. We have heard both the sides and perused the material available on record. We observe that learned CIT (E) rejected the application for grant