BharatTax.net
SearchITATHigh CourtsSupreme CourtPhrasesAI ResearchHistory

Filters

BharatTax.net

Free search engine for ITAT (Income Tax Appellate Tribunal) judgments across all 28 benches in India.

Quick Links

  • Search Judgments
  • Browse by Bench
  • Recent Judgments

About

BharatTax provides free access to Income Tax Appellate Tribunal orders for legal research and reference.

© 2026 BharatTax.net. All rights reserved.

7 results for “charitable trust”+ Section 234clear

Sorted by relevance

Karnataka448Delhi199Mumbai114Bangalore82Chennai40Ahmedabad29Jaipur24Pune21Cuttack18Chandigarh16Calcutta16Kolkata12Amritsar11Lucknow11Rajkot7Visakhapatnam7Cochin6Raipur5SC5Telangana4Indore4Varanasi4Kerala3Rajasthan3Andhra Pradesh2Nagpur2Ranchi2Hyderabad2Panaji2Jodhpur2Agra1T.S. THAKUR ROHINTON FALI NARIMAN1

Key Topics

Section 1027Exemption7Addition to Income7Deduction4Depreciation4Disallowance4Section 133A3Section 113Section 2(24)

ACIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. SRI PRAKASH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY, TUNI

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue for the

ITA 465/VIZ/2017[2008-09]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2008-09

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 10Section 11Section 133ASection 2(24)

Trust. For the sake of convenience and clarity, we extract the relevant paragraphs of the order of the Tribunal which reads as under : “5.3.1 We have heard the rival contentions and perused and carefully considered the material on record; including the judicial pronouncements cited and placed reliance upon. Firstly, we would like to consider the legal position with regard

ACIT, EXEMPTIONS,, VIJAYAWADA vs. SRI PRAKASHA EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, TUNII

3
Survey u/s 133A3

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue for the

ITA 467/VIZ/2017[2011-2012]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2011-2012

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 10Section 11Section 133ASection 2(24)

Trust. For the sake of convenience and clarity, we extract the relevant paragraphs of the order of the Tribunal which reads as under : “5.3.1 We have heard the rival contentions and perused and carefully considered the material on record; including the judicial pronouncements cited and placed reliance upon. Firstly, we would like to consider the legal position with regard

ACIT, (EXEMPTIONS), EXEMPTIONS CIRCLE,, VIJAYAWADA vs. SRI PRAKASH EDUCATIONAL SOCIETY,, TUNI,

In the result, all the appeals filed by the revenue for the

ITA 382/VIZ/2017[2009-2010]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam14 Mar 2018AY 2009-2010

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh

For Appellant: Shri T. Satyanandam, DR
Section 10Section 11Section 133ASection 2(24)

Trust. For the sake of convenience and clarity, we extract the relevant paragraphs of the order of the Tribunal which reads as under : “5.3.1 We have heard the rival contentions and perused and carefully considered the material on record; including the judicial pronouncements cited and placed reliance upon. Firstly, we would like to consider the legal position with regard

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 446/VIZ/2024[2015-16]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Mar 2025AY 2015-16

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohanarao, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 10

234 (SC), he failed to apply the same appropriately to the facts of the case. He placed reliance on the decision of the coordinate bench in the case of Assistant Director of Income Tax vs. Hyderabad Study Circle in ITA no. 1645/Hyd/2013 wherein coordinate Bench noticed the decision of Loka Sikshana Trust and held that if an educational institution complies

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 448/VIZ/2024[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Mar 2025AY 2017-18

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohanarao, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 10

234 (SC), he failed to apply the same appropriately to the facts of the case. He placed reliance on the decision of the coordinate bench in the case of Assistant Director of Income Tax vs. Hyderabad Study Circle in ITA no. 1645/Hyd/2013 wherein coordinate Bench noticed the decision of Loka Sikshana Trust and held that if an educational institution complies

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 447/VIZ/2024[2016-17]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Mar 2025AY 2016-17

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohanarao, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 10

234 (SC), he failed to apply the same appropriately to the facts of the case. He placed reliance on the decision of the coordinate bench in the case of Assistant Director of Income Tax vs. Hyderabad Study Circle in ITA no. 1645/Hyd/2013 wherein coordinate Bench noticed the decision of Loka Sikshana Trust and held that if an educational institution complies

MAQBOOL HUSSAIN EDUCATIONAL WELFARE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER (EXEMPTION WARD), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, all the appeals of the assessee are allowed

ITA 449/VIZ/2024[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam05 Mar 2025AY 2018-19

Bench: Shri K.Narasimha Chary & Shri Balakrishnan S.

For Appellant: Shri P.Murali Mohanarao, ARFor Respondent: Dr.Satyasai Rath, CIT-DR
Section 10

234 (SC), he failed to apply the same appropriately to the facts of the case. He placed reliance on the decision of the coordinate bench in the case of Assistant Director of Income Tax vs. Hyderabad Study Circle in ITA no. 1645/Hyd/2013 wherein coordinate Bench noticed the decision of Loka Sikshana Trust and held that if an educational institution complies