THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DATLA SHANTI, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

1 and 5 are general in nature and need not be adjudicated. 5. Ground No.2 is with respect to treating the consideration as capital receipt and held not taxable by the Ld. CIT(A). In this regard, the Ld. DR submitted that the assessee has entered into an agreement for purchase of a property admeasuring 2000 sq yds with

M/S. ANDHRA TRADE DEVELOPMENT - CORPORATION, PVT.LTD.,GUNTUR vs. THE ACIT,, GUNTUR

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.233/Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Year: 2013-2014) M/S Andhra Trade Development The Assistant Commissioner Corporation Pvt. Ltd., Of Income-Tax, Circle-1(1) Guntur Guntur [Pan : Aabca8777C] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) अपीलार्थी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar प्रत्यार्थी की ओर से/ Respondent By : Shri D.K.Sonowal, Cit Dr

vii) of the Act, , MAT is exempt for sick industrial companies. The Ld.AR further submitted that though the SICA act was repealed, the provision with regard to non-application of MAT in the case of sick industrial companies was not removed from the statute, hence, submitted that the provision of 9 I.T.A. No.233/Viz/2017 Andhra Trade Development Corporation, Guntur non-application

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-1, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. HARI PRASAD BHARARIA, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue as well as C

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleacit, Central Circle-1, Vs. Sri Hari Prasad Bhararia, Visakhapatnam. B-101, Vuda Apartments, Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Ablpb 6853 A (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No.43/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 532/Viz/2018) (Asst. Year : 2009-10) Sri Hari Prasad Bhararia, Vs. Acit, Central Circle-1, B-101, Vuda Apartments, Visakhapatnam. Seethammadhara, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Ablpb 6853 A (Appellant) (Respondent)

vii) The CIT(A) ought to have considered the import of section 292B which came up for discussion in the case of CIT vs. Jagat Novel Exhibitions(P) Ltd.,(201 3)356 ITR 559(Del),wherein it was held that "The aforesaid provision (section 2928) has been enacted to curtail and negate (Sri Hari Prasad Bhararia) technical pleas

SRI UMA KAMANDALESWARA CO - OPERATIVE RURAL BANK LTD.,ATHREYAPURAM vs. THE ADDL. CIT,, KAKINADA

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Blesri Uma Kamandaleswara Vs. Addl.Cit, Kakinada Co-Op Rural Bank Ltd., Ryali, Range, Kakinada. Athreyapuram Mandalm, East Godavari District. Pan No. Aadas 4663 B (Appellant) (Respondent)

9. While the petitioners place strong reliance upon a decision of the Division Bench of this court in CIT v. Andhra Pradesh State Co-operative Bank Ltd. [2011] 12 taxmann.com 66/200 Taxman 200/336 ITR 516, the Revenue places strong reliance upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Totgar's Co-operative Sale Society Ltd. v. ITO [2010] 188 Taxman

THE SRI GOWRI COOPERATIVE SOCIETY,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-1,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blem/S. The Sri Gowri Vs. Pr.Cit-1, Co-Operative Society, Visakhapatnam. D.No.49-34-32/1, Konathala Complex, Akkayyapalem Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 8140 M (Appellant) (Respondent)

capital among its members in the course of their banking business. Adverting to the fact that the phrase "business of banking" is not defined in the Income-tax Act, this court referred to the definition of the expression "banking" appearing in section 5(b) of the Banking Regulation Act to come to the conclusion that the income received

ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-4(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SRI Y VENKANA CHOUDARY,, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal filed by the Revenue as well as the cross objection filed by the assessee are partly allowed

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Bleacit, Circle-4(1), Vs. Y. Venkanna Choudary, Visakhapatnam. D.No. 1-1-2, C/O Anuradha Auto Centre, Sheela Nagar, Nh-5, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aanpy 3003 G (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No. 108/Viz/2019 (Arising Out Of Ita No. 272/Viz/2018) (Asst. Year : 2014-15) Y. Venkanna Choudary, Vs. Acit, Circle-4(1), D.No. 1-1-2, C/O Anuradha Visakhapatnam. Auto Centre, Sheela Nagar, Nh-5, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aanpy 3003 G (Appellant) (Respondent)

9,05,000 shares on 26/03/2014. The FMV of each share was worked out by the Assessing Officer at Rs. 676.55 as on 05/04/2013 as against the book value of assets of Rs. 1,35,30,903/-. Similarly on 26/03/2014, the Assessing Officer had worked out the value of the same shares at Rs. 14.48 without any increase

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, GUNTUR vs. DANDU BRAHMANANDAM, CHENNAI

In the result, appeals of the revenue in I

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.11/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. Sri Danda Brahmanandam Income Tax 13Aj Block, 5Th Street Circle-2(1) Santhi Colony Guntur Annanagar, Chennai [Pan : Aespd2628B]

1) of the Act. The AO considered the objections and found that the submissions made by the assessee are not in line with the treatment given by M/s TMPPL in its books of accounts. The said amount was not debited to expenditure account but was shown as down the line of adjustments. The actual EL with M/s Barclays was dated

THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, GUNTUR vs. BATTINI NAGESWARA RAO, NARASARAOPET

In the result, appeals of the revenue in I

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao& Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.11/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वर्ा/Assessment Year : 2014-15) Asst.Commissioner Of Vs. Sri Danda Brahmanandam Income Tax 13Aj Block, 5Th Street Circle-2(1) Santhi Colony Guntur Annanagar, Chennai [Pan : Aespd2628B]

1) of the Act. The AO considered the objections and found that the submissions made by the assessee are not in line with the treatment given by M/s TMPPL in its books of accounts. The said amount was not debited to expenditure account but was shown as down the line of adjustments. The actual EL with M/s Barclays was dated

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S The Krishna District Co- Income Tax Operative Central Bank Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co Nos.70 & 71/Viz/2017 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Co Nos.60 & 61/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) M/S The Krishna District Co-Operative Deputy Commissioner Of Central Bank Ltd., Income Tax Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Sri D. K. Sonowal,Cit Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018

section 37(1) has no application. Since the assessee failed to carry forward the loss on write off to the General Reserves below the line as prescribed by RBI and the amounts are mainly related to the period during which the income of the assessee was tax exempt, the claim of the assessee u/s 37(1) is not allowable

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-2(1),, VIJAYAWADA vs. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S The Krishna District Co- Income Tax Operative Central Bank Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co Nos.70 & 71/Viz/2017 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Co Nos.60 & 61/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) M/S The Krishna District Co-Operative Deputy Commissioner Of Central Bank Ltd., Income Tax Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Sri D. K. Sonowal,Cit Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018

section 37(1) has no application. Since the assessee failed to carry forward the loss on write off to the General Reserves below the line as prescribed by RBI and the amounts are mainly related to the period during which the income of the assessee was tax exempt, the claim of the assessee u/s 37(1) is not allowable

THE DY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT CO -OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD,, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S The Krishna District Co- Income Tax Operative Central Bank Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co Nos.70 & 71/Viz/2017 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Co Nos.60 & 61/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) M/S The Krishna District Co-Operative Deputy Commissioner Of Central Bank Ltd., Income Tax Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Sri D. K. Sonowal,Cit Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018

section 37(1) has no application. Since the assessee failed to carry forward the loss on write off to the General Reserves below the line as prescribed by RBI and the amounts are mainly related to the period during which the income of the assessee was tax exempt, the claim of the assessee u/s 37(1) is not allowable

THE DY. CIT,, VIJAYAWADA vs. M/S. THE KRISHNA DISTRICT CO -OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK LTD,, MACHILIPATNAM

In the result, the appeals of the revenue for the A

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao & Shri D.S. Sunder Singhआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) आयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) Deputy Commissioner Of Vs. M/S The Krishna District Co- Income Tax Operative Central Bank Ltd., Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Co Nos.70 & 71/Viz/2017 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.301 & 302 /Viz/2017 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2011-2012 & 2012-13) Co Nos.60 & 61/Viz/2018 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.100 & 101 /Viz/2018 (धििाारण िर्ा/ Assessment Years: 2013-2014 & 2014-15) M/S The Krishna District Co-Operative Deputy Commissioner Of Central Bank Ltd., Income Tax Ysr Sahakar Bhavan Circle-2(1), Vijayawada Jagannadhapuram Machilipatnam [Pan : Aabtt0343E] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) राजस्व की ओर से/ Revenue By : Sri D. K. Sonowal,Cit Dr निर्ााररती की ओर से/ Assessee By : Sri K.Siva Ram Kumar, Ar सुिवाई की तारीख / Date Of Hearing : 19.11.2018 घोषणा की तारीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 28.11.2018

section 37(1) has no application. Since the assessee failed to carry forward the loss on write off to the General Reserves below the line as prescribed by RBI and the amounts are mainly related to the period during which the income of the assessee was tax exempt, the claim of the assessee u/s 37(1) is not allowable

THE INCOME TAX OFFICER (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION), KAKINADA vs. SMT. BIKKINA SAVITRI DEVI, SAMALKOT

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अऩीऱ सं./ I.T.A. No.584/Viz/2019 (ननधधारण वषा / Assessment Year: 2014-15) Income Tax Officer Vs. Smt. Bikkina Savitri Devi, (International Taxation), Samalkota. Kakinada. Pan: Btspb 9625 A (अऩीऱधथी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यथी/ Respondent) अऩीऱधथी की ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri K. Hari Prasad प्रत्यधथी की ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Spg Mudaliar, Sr. Ar सुनवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing : 19/04/2022 घोषणध की तधरीख/Date Of : 11/05/2022 Pronouncement O R D E R Per S. Balakrishnan:

vii) The Ld. CIT(A) erred in accepting gift received from Bikkina Srinivas, even though, he had creditworthiness 3 to give the amount to the assessee. Assessee could not prove with correlated evidence that she had taken gift from him. (viii) The ld. CIT (A) erred in accepting sources of income even though the assessee has taken two views, initially

RAMESH MANNAVA,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed for statistical purposes as mentioned herein above

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./ I.T.A. No. 252/Viz/2023 ("नधा"रण वष" / Assessment Year : 2015-16) Mr. Ramesh Mannava, Vs. Income Tax Officer, 5-60-213/1, Msr Cotton Ward-2(1), Corporation, 4/4 Ashok Nagar, Guntur. Guntur, Andhra Pradesh-522007. Pan: Agdpm 8289 Q (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ" क" ओर से/ Appellant By : Sri C. Subrahmanyam, Ar ""याथ" क" ओर से / Respondent By : Sri Madhukar Aves, Sr. Ar

capital gains for the AY 2015-16 but the notices were not complied with by the assessee. Accordingly, the Ld. AO proceeded to complete the assessment U/s. 144 of the Act based on the material available on record. Thus, the Ld. AO 4 completed the assessment U/s. 147 r.w.s 144 of the Act and passed the assessment order dated 27/09/2021

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WRD-1, BHIMAVARAM vs. YENDANGANDHI LARGE SIZED CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकर अपील सं./I.T.A.No.243/Viz/2022 (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) Income Tax Officer Vs. M/S Yendagandhi Large Sized Ward-1 Co-Operative Society Ltd. Bhimavaram D.No.4-13, K.K.Road Yendagandi, West Godavari Dist [Pan : Aacat0967G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Cross Objection No.01/Viz/2023 (Arising Out Of I.T.A.No.243/Viz/2022) (निर्धारण वर्ा / Assessment Year : 2018-19) M/S Yendagandhi Large Sized Co- Income Tax Officer Operative Society Ltd. Ward-1 D.No.4-13, K.K.Road Bhimavaram Yendagandi, West Godavari Dist [Pan : Aacat0967G] (अपीलार्थी/ Appellant) (प्रत्यर्थी/ Respondent) Assessee By : Shri G.V.N.Hari, Ar Revenue By : Shri Madhukar Aves, Dr सुिवधई की तधरीख / Date Of Hearing 10.10.2023 : घोर्णध की तधरीख/Date Of Pronouncement : 22.11.2023 आदेश /O R D E R Per Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy: This Appeal Is Filed By The Revenue Against The Order Of Commissioner Of Income Tax (Appeals) [Cit(A)], National Faceless

capital is eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act. The assessee also submitted that the interest income received from other banks is also eligible for deduction u/s 80P of the Act. The AO completed the assessment vide order dated 16.02.2021 u/s 143(3) of the Act by disallowing to the extent of Rs.2,59,54,906/-, the deduction claimed

DEVI SEA FOODS LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DCIT, CIRCLE-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the assessee is allowed

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Bleआयकरअपीलसं./ I.T.A. No.75/Viz/2022 ("नधा"रणवष"/ Assessment Year: 2017-18) M/S. Devi Sea Foods Limited, Vs. Deputy Commissioner Of Visakhapatnam. Income Tax, Pan: Aabcd 0248 B Circle-3(1), Visakhapatnam. (अपीलाथ"/ Appellant) (""यथ"/ Respondent) अपीलाथ"क"ओरसे/ Appellant By : Sri D. Anand, Advocate ""याथ"क"ओरसे/ Respondent By : Sri Mn Murthy Naik, Cit-Dr

1. Sale of frozen shrimp NIL 2. Corporate Guarantee-given 2,46,43,000 3. Trade receivable 865,10,715 4. Revised Total adjustment 11,11,53,715 u/s. 92CA(3) The Ld. DRP in its detailed order discussed various judicial precedents confirmed the additions made in the draft assessment order by the Ld. AO. Aggrieved by the order passed

KANCHAN LALWANI,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, the appeal filed by the assessee is allowed

Bench: SHRI G. MANJUNATHA, HON’BLE (Accountant Member), SHRI RAVISH SOOD, HON’BLE (Judicial Member)

capital gains and income from other sources for the previous year relevant to the A.Y. 2021-22. In other words, the assessee does not have income from business or profession. If an assessee does not have income from business, the assessee does not require to maintain books of account for computation of income in terms of section 145 or 145A

THE ASST. CIT,, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE VISAKHAPATNAM CO -OPERATIVE BANK LIMITD,, VISAKHAPATNAM

Bench: Shri V. Durga Rao, Hon’Ble & Shri D.S. Sunder Singh, Hon’Blem/S. The Visakhapatnam Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent) Acit, Circle-1(1), Vs. M/S. The Visakhapatnam Visakhapatnam. Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent) C.O.No. 58/Viz/2017 (Ita No. 308/Viz/2017) (Asst. Year : 2013-14) M/S. The Visakhapatnam Vs. Acit, Circle-1(1), Co-Operative Bank Ltd., Visakhapatnam. Near Town Kotha Road, Main Road, Visakhapatnam. Pan No. Aaaat 0844 L (Appellant) (Respondent)

capital only upon determination of the surplus arising from the business i.e. net profit. This is nothing but appropriation of profits but not an expenditure incurred for carrying on the business. The Ld. CIT(A) by following the decision of the coordinate bench of the Tribunal in assessee’s own case for the assessment year 2007-08 in & 19/Vizag/2011