Search: capital gains

5 results for “capital gains”+ Section 9(1)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 142(1)6 Section 143(3)5 Section 54F5 Section 1474 Section 143(2)4 Addition to Income4 Section 683 Capital Gains3 Deduction

INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SURENDRA NATH GUBBALA, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 482/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Us:

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 48

1, 2 and 29 are general in nature which do not call for separate adjudication. 5.3 Ground nos. 3 to 28 are appeal specific which revolve round the one and only issue involved in the case on hand. During the year of account, the assessee sold land of 10,164 sq. yards situated at Rajahmundry, Andhra Pradesh for a 9

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DATLA SHANTI, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is partly allowed for statistical purposes

ITA 33/VIZ/2021[2017-18]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam16 Feb 2023AY 2017-18

INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SURENDRA NATH GUBBALA, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DATLA SHANTI, VISAKHAPATNAM

INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SURENDRA NATH GUBBALA, VISAKHAPATNAM

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CIRCLE-3(1),, VISAKHAPATNAM vs. DATLA SHANTI, VISAKHAPATNAM

RAMESH MANNAVA,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WRD-1, BHIMAVARAM vs. YENDANGANDHI LARGE SIZED CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM

KANCHAN LALWANI,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM