Search: capital gains

3 results for “capital gains”+ Section 56(2)(viib)clear

Sorted by relevance

Mumbai67 Delhi54 Chandigarh48 Kolkata16 Hyderabad13 Chennai13 Indore9 Bangalore9 Nagpur6 Ahmedabad6 Jaipur5 Pune4 Cuttack3 Visakhapatnam3 Raipur3 Patna1 Cochin1 Karnataka1 Rajkot1 SC1 Amritsar1

Key Topics

Section 143(2)6 Section 143(3)5 Section 142(1)4 Section 56(2)(viib)3 Unexplained Cash Credit3 Addition to Income3 Section 143(1)2 Section 682 Section 153A

LINTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed in limine and Cross objection filed is assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 227/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56(2)(viib)Section 68

viib) of the Income tax Act1961, ignoring the method of valuation prescribed under the law. 5. The learned CIT(A) failed to set off the unabsorbed loses of previous years carry forward in the assessment. Page No. 4 I.T.A. No. 227/VIZ/2020 I.T.A. No. 117/VIZ/2021& C.O. No. 13/VIZ/2023 M/s. Linton Projects Private Limited& Smt. Poosarla Satyavathi 6. The appellant

LINTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , VIZIANAGARAM

LINTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , VIZIANAGARAM

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. POOSARLA SATYAVATHI, VIZIANAGARAM

ATR WAREHOUSING PRIVATE LIMITED,VISAKHAPATNAM vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE, , VISAKHAPATNAM