Search: capital gains

2 results for “capital gains”+ Section 56(2)(viib)clear

Sorted by relevance

Chandigarh48 Delhi27 Mumbai20 Chennai10 Hyderabad7 Nagpur5 Bangalore5 Jaipur4 Ahmedabad3 Raipur3 Visakhapatnam2 Indore2 Pune2 Patna1 Rajkot1 Kolkata1

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 143(2)4 Section 143(1)2 Section 142(1)2 Section 56(2)(viib)2 Section 682 Unexplained Cash Credit2 Addition to Income2

LINTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , VIZIANAGARAM

In the result, appeal of the revenue is dismissed in limine and Cross objection filed is assessee is dismissed as infructuous

ITA 227/VIZ/2020[2014-15]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam30 Oct 2024AY 2014-15

Bench: Shri Duvvuru Rl Reddy, Hon’Ble & Shri S Balakrishnan, Hon’Ble

Section 142(1)Section 143(1)Section 143(2)Section 143(3)Section 56(2)(viib)Section 68

viib) of the Income tax Act1961, ignoring the method of valuation prescribed under the law. 5. The learned CIT(A) failed to set off the unabsorbed loses of previous years carry forward in the assessment. Page No. 4 I.T.A. No. 227/VIZ/2020 I.T.A. No. 117/VIZ/2021& C.O. No. 13/VIZ/2023 M/s. Linton Projects Private Limited& Smt. Poosarla Satyavathi 6. The appellant

LINTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , VIZIANAGARAM

LINTON PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED,VIZIANAGARAM vs. THE INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, , VIZIANAGARAM

THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, CENTRAL CIRCLE-2, , VISAKHAPATNAM vs. POOSARLA SATYAVATHI, VIZIANAGARAM