Search: capital gains

4 results for “capital gains”+ Section 56(2)(vii)clear

Sorted by relevance

Key Topics

Section 143(3)4 Section 1474 Section 142(1)3 Section 143(2)3 Section 683 Addition to Income3 Section 1482 Section 56(2)(vii)2 Section 80P(2)2

INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SURENDRA NATH GUBBALA, VISAKHAPATNAM

ITA 482/VIZ/2024[2020-21]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam10 Oct 2025AY 2020-21

Bench: Us:

Section 143(3)Section 144BSection 48

56,62,270/-, after treating the aforesaid amount of Rs. 9 crores as non-deductible. 7 ITA No.482/Viz/2024 & CO No.03/Viz/2025 Surendra Nath Gubbala 5. Aggrieved, the assessee carried the matter in appeal before the CIT(A). The assessee submitted before the CIT(A) that the property was encumbered under SARFAESI proceedings that were initiated by both banks, as the same

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WRD-1, BHIMAVARAM vs. YENDANGANDHI LARGE SIZED CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM

In the result, appeal of the Revenue is dismissed

ITA 243/VIZ/2022[2018-19]Status: DisposedITAT Visakhapatnam22 Nov 2023

INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SURENDRA NATH GUBBALA, VISAKHAPATNAM

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WRD-1, BHIMAVARAM vs. YENDANGANDHI LARGE SIZED CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM

INCOMETAX OFFICER, WARD-3(1), VISAKHAPATNAM vs. SURENDRA NATH GUBBALA, VISAKHAPATNAM

INCOME TAX OFFICER, WRD-1, BHIMAVARAM vs. YENDANGANDHI LARGE SIZED CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD, VISAKHAPATNAM

KANCHAN LALWANI,VIZIANAGARAM vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-1, VIZIANAGARAM

RAMESH MANNAVA,GUNTUR vs. INCOME TAX OFFICER, WARD-2(1), GUNTUR